basquebromance
Diamond Member
- Nov 26, 2015
- 109,396
- 27,053
- 2,220
- Banned
- #1
there are special elections in 3 different states, not that anyone would care. they're too busy caring about whether Trump is a drug addict.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
there are special elections in 3 different states, not that anyone would care. they're too busy caring about whether Trump is a drug addict.
there are special elections in 3 different states, not that anyone would care. they're too busy caring about whether Trump is a drug addict.
You need to provide a link to what you are talking about
A telling quip from your articleAnd so it begins.This is excellent new. Excellent news indeed...
Democrats grab key Wisconsin Senate seat in Tuesday's special elections
Yup! Only 990 seats to go to win back all of Obama's losses!And so it begins.This is excellent new. Excellent news indeed...
Democrats grab key Wisconsin Senate seat in Tuesday's special elections
It took 8 years, have a seat and relax.Yup! Only 990 seats to go to win back all of Obama's losses!
Hahahahaha
Losers
And so it begins.This is excellent new. Excellent news indeed...
Democrats grab key Wisconsin Senate seat in Tuesday's special elections
And so it begins.This is excellent new. Excellent news indeed...
Democrats grab key Wisconsin Senate seat in Tuesday's special elections
`The Dem won 1,600 more votes, that she was a woman running against a man e.g. gender probably accounted for most of those votes and she no doubt pretended to be conservative like filthy lying Dem's always do in these districts. Yet the spin was this is a referendum on Trump? You liberal retards are deluding yourselves again
LolAnd so it begins.This is excellent new. Excellent news indeed...
Democrats grab key Wisconsin Senate seat in Tuesday's special elections
From your link... LMFAO
With the two additions, Republicans will hold a 63-35 majority
`The Dem won 1,600 more votes, that she was a woman running against a man e.g. gender probably accounted for most of those votes and she no doubt pretended to be conservative like filthy lying Dem's always do in these districts. Yet the spin was this is a referendum on Trump? You liberal retards are deluding yourselves again
`
You are right, for the wrong reasons. This was a small scale referendum on Scott Walker (R), not trump. It was a referendum against Walkers power grab, through the republican controlled state House, at Madison's (capitol of Wisconsin) usurping local control, especially by using the DNR. (Department of Natural Resources) Northern Wisconsin districts are raising hell about this. None of the campaigns even mentioned trump.