Biden Poised To Declare Climate Emergency To Ram Through Green Agenda: REPORT

[imawhosure]

It's clear America wants a REFUND on this Biden moron.

Did you ever wonder why they never have experts from both sides of the issue debate and have it televised?

Well, they did before a ways back, it just wasn't televised. What they discovered was------------->the climate crowd from a scientific perspective, couldn't match up their theories with events in evidence. So, they changed tactics. Instead of debate, they funded experts to parrot their take on the situation. This is exactly why you have seen so many scandals in climate research from the e-mail scandal on down.

Now, I am not a scientist, so I can not tell you they are, or are not correct. But what I can tell you is--------->they have NOT been able to prove it by scientific standards that have been the mainstay of proof throughout the scientific community for over a century, as far as the cause, or multiple causes, and what % each cause has upon the subject they are studying.

Would you spend 20 to 50 trillion to stop our planet from burning up if our actions were 85 to 100% responsible? Probably, in fact, most would say yes.

But, if you are 1 or 2% responsible, would you then agree? Probably not! You would reasonably say----->wait for the advent of better technology to address the issue. That is exactly why they don't want a debate by experts, because they then don't have to prove their case. It is getting hotter/colder, and it is climate change. They can point that out. But as soon as you ask them to prove how much impact in % humans have upon it, they start stuttering, because you are now asking questions, for which they have no answers, just unproven theories!

 

[ColonelAngus]

The Dems are using Biden like credit card you max out once you decide to declare bankruptcy. They are trying to make everything stick to Biden before they burn him.

 

[Independentthinker]

I don't recall the Constitution containing such a clause.

Biden Poised To Declare Climate Emergency To Ram Through Green Agenda: REPORT​

​

President Joe Biden could declare a climate emergency as soon as this week, according to The Washington Post, in a bid to implement elements of his environmental agenda as climate legislation has stalled in Congress.​

​

Leading Biden administration officials are debating ways to advance the president’s agenda, and the president is prepared to announce a number of new initiatives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, reported the Post, citing three people familiar with the matter. The internal discussions come after Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia told party leaders last week that he opposes the plans to advance this month’s significant economic package that includes billions of dollars toward slashing carbon emissions and promoting green energy.​

​

White House Economic Adviser Jared Bernstein told reporters at a press briefing Monday that Biden would work “aggressively to attack climate change.”​

​

“Realistically there is a lot he can do and there is a lot he will do,” Bernstein stated.​

​

“Unilaterally declaring a climate emergency will not reduce emissions by one molecule,” American Exploration & Production Council CEO, Anne Bradbury said on Twitter Tuesday. “In fact, many of the policies that could follow from declaring a climate emergency would increase emissions while driving up costs for American families.”​

​

Democratic lawmakers are also calling on Biden to use his powers to enact further climate policies amid failed legislative action and the Supreme Court’s recent decision to limit the regulatory abilities of the Environmental Protection Agency.​

​

On Monday, Democratic Sen. Jeff Merkley of Oregon said it was time for Biden to take massive, unilateral executive actions on climate change, even if the Supreme Court rules them unconstitutional.​

​

“There is probably nothing more important for our nation and our world than for the United States to drive a bold, energetic transition in its energy economy from fossil fuels to renewable energy,” Merkley told reporters on Monday, according to the Post.​

​

“This also unchains the president from waiting for Congress to act,” Merkley said, referencing the recent legislative impasse.​

​

Meanwhile, Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, who chairs the Senate Finance Committee, said that lawmakers should continue to pursue legislation in a statement on Monday.​

​

“While I strongly support additional executive action by President Biden, we know a flood of Republican lawsuits will follow,” Wyden said, according to the Post.​

​

“Legislation continues to be the best option here,” he added.​

​

The White House did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.​

Amazing how with the price of gas and other high inflation Democrats want those to go even higher fighting the climate.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

I don't recall the Constitution containing such a clause.

Biden Poised To Declare Climate Emergency To Ram Through Green Agenda: REPORT​

​

President Joe Biden could declare a climate emergency as soon as this week, according to The Washington Post, in a bid to implement elements of his environmental agenda as climate legislation has stalled in Congress.​

​

Leading Biden administration officials are debating ways to advance the president’s agenda, and the president is prepared to announce a number of new initiatives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, reported the Post, citing three people familiar with the matter. The internal discussions come after Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia told party leaders last week that he opposes the plans to advance this month’s significant economic package that includes billions of dollars toward slashing carbon emissions and promoting green energy.​

​

White House Economic Adviser Jared Bernstein told reporters at a press briefing Monday that Biden would work “aggressively to attack climate change.”​

​

“Realistically there is a lot he can do and there is a lot he will do,” Bernstein stated.​

​

“Unilaterally declaring a climate emergency will not reduce emissions by one molecule,” American Exploration & Production Council CEO, Anne Bradbury said on Twitter Tuesday. “In fact, many of the policies that could follow from declaring a climate emergency would increase emissions while driving up costs for American families.”​

​

Democratic lawmakers are also calling on Biden to use his powers to enact further climate policies amid failed legislative action and the Supreme Court’s recent decision to limit the regulatory abilities of the Environmental Protection Agency.​

​

On Monday, Democratic Sen. Jeff Merkley of Oregon said it was time for Biden to take massive, unilateral executive actions on climate change, even if the Supreme Court rules them unconstitutional.​

​

“There is probably nothing more important for our nation and our world than for the United States to drive a bold, energetic transition in its energy economy from fossil fuels to renewable energy,” Merkley told reporters on Monday, according to the Post.​

​

“This also unchains the president from waiting for Congress to act,” Merkley said, referencing the recent legislative impasse.​

​

Meanwhile, Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, who chairs the Senate Finance Committee, said that lawmakers should continue to pursue legislation in a statement on Monday.​

​

“While I strongly support additional executive action by President Biden, we know a flood of Republican lawsuits will follow,” Wyden said, according to the Post.​

​

“Legislation continues to be the best option here,” he added.​

​

The White House did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.​

Another attempted treasury raid in the making.

How....original...

 

[bripat9643]

Another attempted treasury raid in the making.

How....original...

Biden has been going on a spending spree every since he got elected. That's what Dims always do. Then they blame Republicans for the deficit.

 

[BlindBoo]

That illegal border crossing were at low point in 2016 didn't stop the Trumpyberra from declaring an emergency on the border to access presidential superpowers to build the Wall Mexico was suppose to pay for.

What presidential superpower could Joe be getting that has the Neo-GOP's panties all in a tightwad?

 

[bripat9643]

That illegal border crossing were at low point in 2016 didn't stop the Trumpyberra from declaring an emergency on the border to access presidential superpowers to build the Wall Mexico was suppose to pay for.

What presidential superpower could Joe be getting that has the Neo-GOP's panties all in a tightwad?

He didn't access any power that he didn't already have. He certainly didn't repeal the Constitution, which is what Biden is trying to do.

 

[BlindBoo]

He didn't access any power that he didn't already have. He certainly didn't repeal the Constitution, which is what Biden is trying to do.

It was the only reason to declare an emergency. Which btw was and is up to the President to decide if one exsits or not, confirmed by the courts. Completely Constitutional.

 

[bripat9643]

It was the only reason to declare an emergency. Which btw was and is up to the President to decide if one exsits or not, confirmed by the courts. Completely Constitutional.

I wasn't even aware that he declared any such emergency. However, the climate is not an emergency. It's been around for billions of years.

 

[BlindBoo]

I wasn't even aware that he declared any such emergency. However, the climate is not an emergency. It's been around for billions of years.

Well I didn't think the border was either but the decision is up to the President. Note, the President is still limited as to what an EO can do. The Wall didn't get built and the Green Agenda (what ever that is) will not be enacted by EO's alone.

 

[BluesLegend]

Did you ever wonder why they never have experts from both sides of the issue debate and have it televised?

Well, they did before a ways back, it just wasn't televised. What they discovered was------------->the climate crowd from a scientific perspective, couldn't match up their theories with events in evidence. So, they changed tactics. Instead of debate, they funded experts to parrot their take on the situation. This is exactly why you have seen so many scandals in climate research from the e-mail scandal on down.

Now, I am not a scientist, so I can not tell you they are, or are not correct. But what I can tell you is--------->they have NOT been able to prove it by scientific standards that have been the mainstay of proof throughout the scientific community for over a century, as far as the cause, or multiple causes, and what % each cause has upon the subject they are studying.

Would you spend 20 to 50 trillion to stop our planet from burning up if our actions were 85 to 100% responsible? Probably, in fact, most would say yes.

But, if you are 1 or 2% responsible, would you then agree? Probably not! You would reasonably say----->wait for the advent of better technology to address the issue. That is exactly why they don't want a debate by experts, because they then don't have to prove their case. It is getting hotter/colder, and it is climate change. They can point that out. But as soon as you ask them to prove how much impact in % humans have upon it, they start stuttering, because you are now asking questions, for which they have no answers, just unproven theories!

We have discovered that scientists have had to manipulate the data to FIT the narrative. Why would scientists do this? Because the scientists have been corrupted by government grants. You want that grant money to make a living as a climate change scientist, then you have to RIG the results. This is also why the left have such a violent reaction to peer reviews that disagree with the rigged results.

 

[The Original Tree]

I don't recall the Constitution containing such a clause.

Biden Poised To Declare Climate Emergency To Ram Through Green Agenda: REPORT​

​

President Joe Biden could declare a climate emergency as soon as this week, according to The Washington Post, in a bid to implement elements of his environmental agenda as climate legislation has stalled in Congress.​

​

Leading Biden administration officials are debating ways to advance the president’s agenda, and the president is prepared to announce a number of new initiatives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, reported the Post, citing three people familiar with the matter. The internal discussions come after Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia told party leaders last week that he opposes the plans to advance this month’s significant economic package that includes billions of dollars toward slashing carbon emissions and promoting green energy.​

​

White House Economic Adviser Jared Bernstein told reporters at a press briefing Monday that Biden would work “aggressively to attack climate change.”​

​

“Realistically there is a lot he can do and there is a lot he will do,” Bernstein stated.​

​

“Unilaterally declaring a climate emergency will not reduce emissions by one molecule,” American Exploration & Production Council CEO, Anne Bradbury said on Twitter Tuesday. “In fact, many of the policies that could follow from declaring a climate emergency would increase emissions while driving up costs for American families.”​

​

Democratic lawmakers are also calling on Biden to use his powers to enact further climate policies amid failed legislative action and the Supreme Court’s recent decision to limit the regulatory abilities of the Environmental Protection Agency.​

​

On Monday, Democratic Sen. Jeff Merkley of Oregon said it was time for Biden to take massive, unilateral executive actions on climate change, even if the Supreme Court rules them unconstitutional.​

​

“There is probably nothing more important for our nation and our world than for the United States to drive a bold, energetic transition in its energy economy from fossil fuels to renewable energy,” Merkley told reporters on Monday, according to the Post.​

​

“This also unchains the president from waiting for Congress to act,” Merkley said, referencing the recent legislative impasse.​

​

Meanwhile, Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, who chairs the Senate Finance Committee, said that lawmakers should continue to pursue legislation in a statement on Monday.​

​

“While I strongly support additional executive action by President Biden, we know a flood of Republican lawsuits will follow,” Wyden said, according to the Post.​

​

“Legislation continues to be the best option here,” he added.​

​

The White House did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.​

This will no doubt require Maduro voting machines and Mass Mail In Balloting and numerous unsecured drop boxes.

 

[bendog]

You don't get to declare an "emergency" any time that the Constitution prevents you from getting your way...yet that's what progressives now wish to do! The President doesn't have the Constitutional authority to do that and with good reason. Our entire system of government was set up DELIBERATELY so he didn't have that authority but liberals have seen that they can use "emergencies" as the excuse to ignore governmental checks and balances! If you want to impose a Green New Deal on the country? Get the votes to do so by getting the People to elect you to Congress! Joe Biden isn't a King.

Oh really? No one saw this coming? Not with Battlin' Bill Barr and Trump and unitary theory powers?

Trump declares national emergency to get border wall funding

President Donald Trump announced that he's declaring a national emergency to get funding for his proposed border wall that congressional Democrats refused to give him.

abcnews.go.com

President Trump signs executive order potentially banning Huawei equipment

Trump signed an executive order banning American companies from using any telecommunications equipment deemed to be a national security risk.

www.usatoday.com

It's not that no one warned that Trump was upping the ante on using emergency declarations to achieve what he could not get through congress, and that was different from even the 75 or whatever emergencies that have been declared since 1976 that usually involve embargos because of wars or things that effect our economy, like strikes and covid and shortages. It's not that no one warned the Trumpfans that they were opening a can of worms.

 

[tshrimp]

I don't recall the Constitution containing such a clause.

Biden Poised To Declare Climate Emergency To Ram Through Green Agenda: REPORT​

​

President Joe Biden could declare a climate emergency as soon as this week, according to The Washington Post, in a bid to implement elements of his environmental agenda as climate legislation has stalled in Congress.​

​

Leading Biden administration officials are debating ways to advance the president’s agenda, and the president is prepared to announce a number of new initiatives to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, reported the Post, citing three people familiar with the matter. The internal discussions come after Democratic Sen. Joe Manchin of West Virginia told party leaders last week that he opposes the plans to advance this month’s significant economic package that includes billions of dollars toward slashing carbon emissions and promoting green energy.​

​

White House Economic Adviser Jared Bernstein told reporters at a press briefing Monday that Biden would work “aggressively to attack climate change.”​

​

“Realistically there is a lot he can do and there is a lot he will do,” Bernstein stated.​

​

“Unilaterally declaring a climate emergency will not reduce emissions by one molecule,” American Exploration & Production Council CEO, Anne Bradbury said on Twitter Tuesday. “In fact, many of the policies that could follow from declaring a climate emergency would increase emissions while driving up costs for American families.”​

​

Democratic lawmakers are also calling on Biden to use his powers to enact further climate policies amid failed legislative action and the Supreme Court’s recent decision to limit the regulatory abilities of the Environmental Protection Agency.​

​

On Monday, Democratic Sen. Jeff Merkley of Oregon said it was time for Biden to take massive, unilateral executive actions on climate change, even if the Supreme Court rules them unconstitutional.​

​

“There is probably nothing more important for our nation and our world than for the United States to drive a bold, energetic transition in its energy economy from fossil fuels to renewable energy,” Merkley told reporters on Monday, according to the Post.​

​

“This also unchains the president from waiting for Congress to act,” Merkley said, referencing the recent legislative impasse.​

​

Meanwhile, Democratic Sen. Ron Wyden of Oregon, who chairs the Senate Finance Committee, said that lawmakers should continue to pursue legislation in a statement on Monday.​

​

“While I strongly support additional executive action by President Biden, we know a flood of Republican lawsuits will follow,” Wyden said, according to the Post.​

​

“Legislation continues to be the best option here,” he added.​

​

The White House did not immediately respond to the Daily Caller News Foundation’s request for comment.​

Bident doing something stupid? The heck you say.

 

[BluesLegend]

I'm declaring a Biden emergency; he needs to be removed or impeached.

 

[OKTexas]

That illegal border crossing were at low point in 2016 didn't stop the Trumpyberra from declaring an emergency on the border to access presidential superpowers to build the Wall Mexico was suppose to pay for.

What presidential superpower could Joe be getting that has the Neo-GOP's panties all in a tightwad?

Trump had the authority under LAW, xiden has nothing comparable.

.

 

[OKTexas]

It was the only reason to declare an emergency. Which btw was and is up to the President to decide if one exsits or not, confirmed by the courts. Completely Constitutional.

And all he would need to show is that the Constitution gives him any authority over the global climate. Good luck with that.

.

 

[BlindBoo]

Trump had the authority under LAW, xiden has nothing comparable.

.

Trumpyberra had the authority to decide what is an emergency by law. But then again all presidents have had it since the law was passed.

 

[BlindBoo]

And all he would need to show is that the Constitution gives him any authority over the global climate. Good luck with that.

.

There are no such restrictions on how the president decides what is an emergency or where in the world it is occurring.

Congress could close the loophole that presidents have exploited since it was passed but......the duopoly says no ya don't.........

 

[OKTexas]

Trumpyberra had the authority to decide what is an emergency by law. But then again all presidents have had it since the law was passed.

So you don't think fentanyl coming across the southern border, and being the leading cause of death in 18-49 year olds, isn't an emergency?

.