Best Equipped Army In The World?

Discussion in 'Middle East - General' started by NATO AIR, Dec 18, 2004.

  1. NATO AIR
    Offline

    NATO AIR Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    Messages:
    4,275
    Thanks Received:
    282
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    USS Abraham Lincoln
    Ratings:
    +282
    is it true? i'm not sure, you tell me... it doesn't sound good though

     
  2. dmp
    Offline

    dmp Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    13,088
    Thanks Received:
    741
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Enterprise, Alabama
    Ratings:
    +741
    what a crock of horseshit.
     
  3. freeandfun1
    Offline

    freeandfun1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2004
    Messages:
    6,201
    Thanks Received:
    295
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +296
    You know, I am really sick of hearing how the hummers don't have armour and should. They never had (other than a few scout hummers that had KEVLAR) armour. They weren't designed to have armour. They replaced the old willies jeep. I remember when my unit, in 1986, received some of the first hummers put into service when I was stationed at Camp Greaves in Korea. They were much better than the jeep and we never expected them to have armour as they were not designed that way. I am sick of hearing this, as -=d=- so aptly puts it, "HORSESHIT".

    There was no armoured hummers in Kosovo, Panama, Gulf War I, etc., etc.
     
  4. NATO AIR
    Offline

    NATO AIR Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    Messages:
    4,275
    Thanks Received:
    282
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    USS Abraham Lincoln
    Ratings:
    +282
    there were no insurgents/IEDS in kosovo, panama, gulf war I....
     
  5. freeandfun1
    Offline

    freeandfun1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2004
    Messages:
    6,201
    Thanks Received:
    295
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +296
    insurgents, armies, combatants, whatever you want to call them, they pose the same threat. The point is, the Hummer NEVER was designed to be armoured. period.
     
  6. NATO AIR
    Offline

    NATO AIR Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    Messages:
    4,275
    Thanks Received:
    282
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    USS Abraham Lincoln
    Ratings:
    +282
    they pose different threats. the iraqi insurgents do not fight likle the panama army or the iraqi army... then among them you have those who are terrorists, and among them, those who are suicide bombers. new challenges for the world's premier fighting force.

    if the hummer was never designed to be armored then, i guess a whole lot of guys have died needlessly because somebody didn't think quick enough on their feet to realize in the first six months of the insurgency that something was necessary to protect guys from IEDS...????
     
  7. Doc Holiday
    Offline

    Doc Holiday BANNED

    Joined:
    May 7, 2004
    Messages:
    184
    Thanks Received:
    20
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +20
    So we armor all of our vehicles, it only takes a little more explosive to blow something with armor up. The military needs to change its mindset and start fighting the way it should be fighting. They need to gather intel from the community, make quick strikes to take out enemy leadership based on that intel, and start pysch warfare on the insurgents. Quit letting them name the dance tune and have them dance to ours. Just goes to show that the military still hasn't learned its counterinsurgency lessons that we should have learned from Vietnam.
     
  8. freeandfun1
    Offline

    freeandfun1 VIP Member

    Joined:
    Feb 14, 2004
    Messages:
    6,201
    Thanks Received:
    295
    Trophy Points:
    83
    Ratings:
    +296
    I keep in contact with many guys from my old unit that are now in the Ramadi area (Delta Company, 1st Battalion, 506th Infantry) and the problem is, since the hummer was - again - never designed to be armored, the extra weight is causing the hummers to break down. So now they have problems with being sitting ducks. Get a clue nato.

    As pointed out, and IED is only one type of explosive. Anti-tank mines have been around forever and armour is not going to stop that. You can't just keep trying to make things more bullet proof and you have to work with what you have. My point was and still is, too much emphasis is being put on this armour issue when the damn vehicles were never designed that way to begin with. What do you want them to do, put larger engines in them and totally redeign the vehicles and then when the enemy starts using bigger IEDs, mines, etc., we start the process all over again?
     
  9. NATO AIR
    Offline

    NATO AIR Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jun 25, 2004
    Messages:
    4,275
    Thanks Received:
    282
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    USS Abraham Lincoln
    Ratings:
    +282
    that's the nature of warfare... we advance, then the enemy counteradvances, etc etc

    i see your point about weighing it down and them becoming sitting ducks. the whole situation is just a fucked up no win deal. i wonder maybe if clinton and congress hadn't pissed away so much of our R&D in the 90's we couldn't have developed a lighter weight, tougher armor....

    but that's just a thought.

    :cof: thanks to you and doc holliday for taking the time to explain to a thickheaded squid like myself without calling names or getting irate.
     
  10. dmp
    Offline

    dmp Senior Member

    Joined:
    May 12, 2004
    Messages:
    13,088
    Thanks Received:
    741
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Enterprise, Alabama
    Ratings:
    +741
    Free - give it up. It's a case of arm-chair 'generals' spouting ideas which 'brief well' but have little practical value.
     

Share This Page