Because He Said So

[Lastamender]

132,000 "Change of Address" flags in single GA county​

Rich "The People's Pundit" Baris
@Peoples_Pundit

Wondering why
@Twitter
would list this tweet as "disputed"? We have access to voter files. That is our business. Do they? There are ≈132k CoA flags on the rolls in Fulton County, Georgia. First image excludes CoAs, the second does not. It's not "disputed". It is reality.

 

[BWK]

6. As laid out in the Texas lawsuit, Pennsylvania’s mail-in ballot anomalies at 118,426 affected ballots. The anomalies from this December 16th version shows:

• 161,774 records have alterations
  • Of these alterations:
    • 116,840 were Returned Dates changes
    • 69,004 were marked “Returned” after Nov 3rd
    • 19,660 were marked “Returned” after Nov 6th
• 13,450 ballots have been deleted since Nov 10th
• 10,415 Return Date with no Mail Date
• 5,052 Applications Returned after Ballot Mailed
• 1,034 Applications Approved after Application Returned

Evidence Stats on the 2020 Election | Here Is The Evidence

Crowdsourcing evidence for journalists.

hereistheevidence.com

You can see why it never got to a court.

These weren't alterations or anomalies. Anomalies are not evidence of fraud to begin with. This is clerical, not fraud. The only anomaly is your mental state. You are mentally challenged over Trump's loss. You should talk to a psychiatrist.

 

[Lastamender]

I just want to ask the administrators of the Pennsylvania election database, were you turning back the clock? You took the data records provided to the public as a game? And you falsified them at will. What were you trying to cover up?

Are you wearing a suit? If you are, you are an idiot with a suit. When you link something like this, where the investigator is asking questions, what is the first thing that should pop in your head, if you are not a conspiracy nut? Thank you! In reading this nonsense, it's clear there was a clerical mistake, not election fraud.

Let me explain this where a fourth grader could understand it. If this was a real attempt at voter fraud, to make a difference, why would this be fraud on such a small scale? BECAUSE IT WASN'T FRAUD you idiot.

I falsified nothing you jerk.

 

[Lastamender]

These weren't alterations or anomalies. Anomalies are not evidence of fraud to begin with. This is clerical, not fraud. The only anomaly is your mental state. You are mentally challenged over Trump's loss. You should talk to a psychiatrist.

So you have no answer and believe in coincidence instead of conspiracy? You suck at this.

 

[BWK]

132,000 "Change of Address" flags in single GA county​

Rich "The People's Pundit" Baris
@Peoples_Pundit

Wondering why
@Twitter
would list this tweet as "disputed"? We have access to voter files. That is our business. Do they? There are ≈132k CoA flags on the rolls in Fulton County, Georgia. First image excludes CoAs, the second does not. It's not "disputed". It is reality.

Why is a change of address a flag? Easy, it's because of suppression and the 1688 poll closings. When these folks rely on mail-in because of poll closings, and they move, the issue becomes clerical, not fraud. These poll closings are ripe for Right-wing nut job conspiracy theories for fraud, when none of this is fraud.

 

[BWK]

I falsified nothing you jerk.

Well your link did it for you there Sling Blade.

 

[Lastamender]

"It Defies Logic": Scientist Finds Telltale Signs Of Election Fraud After Analyzing Mail-In Ballot Data​

"It Defies Logic": Scientist Finds Telltale Signs Of Election Fraud After Analyzing Mail-In Ballot Data | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

 

[BULLDOG]

So you have no answer and believe in coincidence instead of conspiracy? You suck at this.

No conspiracy theory left behind, right?

 

[Lastamender]

Well your link did it for you there Sling Blade.

Can you prove that jerk? No, you can't.

 

[Lastamender]

No conspiracy theory left behind, right?

There was massive and obvious fraud, conspiracies not withstanding.

 

[BWK]

So you have no answer and believe in coincidence instead of conspiracy? You suck at this.

If there is no confirmation of fraud due to an anomaly or irregularity, that can easily be explained by way of 1688 poll closings, or people moving, yea, it's called logical deductive reasoning. Ever heard of it?

 

[Lastamender]

If there is no confirmation of fraud due to an anomaly or irregularity, that can easily be explained by way of 1688 poll closings, or people moving, yea, it's called logical deductive reasoning. Ever heard of it?

Shove your poll closings. What I have shown you is state data that mysteriously changes while being withheld from public view. Fraud, asshole.

 

[BWK]

Can you prove that jerk? No, you can't.

Your article did it for me there loser. I didn't have to. Thanks to you and your link, that needed to refer to questioning others, exposed it as investigatory article, versus fact based. Run this article through the courts, and they'd puke laughing at it.

 

[BULLDOG]

There was massive and obvious fraud, conspiracies not withstanding.

Nobody will ever be able to make you accept reality, but at some point, you should at least consider it.

 

[BWK]

Shove your poll closings. What I have shown you is state data that mysteriously changes while being withheld from public view. Fraud, asshole.

A date change has no relationship with fraud, unless you prove so. Your link never did that. It blew its cover with questions. Again, the dates can easily be explained because of the recent poll closings, people changing their address, Dejoys slow mail service, Covid, etc. Either way, anomalies aren't going to cut it.

 

[Lastamender]

This lady is a minority. They do not lie according to Democrats. Why were things like this never investigated? This is fraud and an eyewitness to that fraud.

 

[Lastamender]

A date change has no relationship with fraud, unless you prove so. Your link never did that. It blew its cover with questions. Again, the dates can easily be explained because of the recent poll closings, people changing their address, Dejoys slow mail service, Covid, etc. Either way, anomalies aren't going to cut it.

Nope. What does not cut it is liars telling us these things did not happen with no investigation to back up what they say. No one believes proven liars but fools and criminals.

 

[BWK]

"It Defies Logic": Scientist Finds Telltale Signs Of Election Fraud After Analyzing Mail-In Ballot Data​

"It Defies Logic": Scientist Finds Telltale Signs Of Election Fraud After Analyzing Mail-In Ballot Data | ZeroHedge

ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero

www.zerohedge.com

Zerohedge.com? That's FB conspiracy wackadoodle crap. Seriously, how old are you?

From your article;
This slight drift from D to R mail-ins occurs again and again, and is likely due to outlying rural areas having more R votes. These outlying areas take longer to ship their ballots to the polling centers.

Now we're getting into the really good stuff. When we see mail-in ballot counting where there isn't relatively stable ratios of D and R ballots that slightly drift R, we have an anomaly! Anomalies themselves are not necessarily fraud, but they can help us spot fraud more easily.

Now let's look at some anomalies:

This is the Wisconsin vote counting history log. Again, on the Y axis we have the ratio of D to R ballots in reporting batch, and on the X axis we have reporting time. Around 4am there, there is a marked shift in the ratio of D to R mail-in ballots. Based on other posts in this thread, this should not happen. This is an anomaly, and while anomalies are not always fraud, often they may point to fraud. "While anomalies are not necessarily fraud." That's the author telling us this, but in his title, he refers to it as fraud. Look Sling Blade, you can pedal dozens of these conspiracy theories until the cows come home, continue making a fool of yourself, and there will always be one thing in common, all these conspiracy theories will have. All of them are fishing. And the sad thing for you is, they are fishing with no bait. You're the only fucking bait.

 

[Lastamender]

Zerohedge.com? That's FB conspiracy wackadoodle crap. Seriously, how old are you?

Your critique of sources means 0. Next. And the FBI is now the KBG.

 

[BWK]

Nope. What does not cut it is liars telling us these things did not happen with no investigation to back up what they say. No one believes proven liars but fools and criminals.

You just said absolutely nothing. All of these links are doing the same thing. Fishing! They are trying to pretend fraud, but the articles never pin it down. That's because they are fishing, and the only thing they are reeling in, are suckers like you.