Barbara Boxer says dead Babies cured Polio and Chicken Pox.. Wtf?

[Jroc]

Is there something wrong with this women? or is she really this stupid?

 

[Political Junky]

The tissue is volunteered by the patient, and abortion is legal.

 

[Redfish]

The tissue is volunteered by the patient, and abortion is legal.

Legal, moral, and ethical are three separate concepts. millions of people are in this country illegally, do you have an issue with that?

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Boxer has mush for brains

 

[jon_berzerk]

Is there something wrong with this women? or is she really this stupid?

yes

and

yes

the real question

are her supporters that stupid to believe her crapola

 

[my2¢]

Vatican Statement on Vaccines Derived From Aborted Human Fetuses

The vaccines that are incriminated today as using human cell lines from aborted foetuses, WI-38 and MRC-5, are the following:7
A) Live vaccines against rubella8:

• the monovalent vaccines against rubella Meruvax®!! (Merck) (U.S.), Rudivax® (Sanofi Pasteur, Fr.), and Ervevax® (RA 27/3) (GlaxoSmithKline, Belgium);
• the combined vaccine MR against rubella and measles, commercialized with the name of M-R-VAX® (Merck, US) and Rudi-Rouvax® (AVP, France);
• the combined vaccine against rubella and mumps marketed under the name of Biavax®!! (Merck, U.S.),
• the combined vaccine MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) against rubella, mumps and measles, marketed under the name of M-M-R® II (Merck, US), R.O.R.®, Trimovax® (Sanofi Pasteur, Fr.), and Priorix® (GlaxoSmithKline UK).

B) Other vaccines, also prepared using human cell lines from aborted foetuses:

• two vaccines against hepatitis A, one produced by Merck (VAQTA), the other one produced by GlaxoSmithKline (HAVRIX), both of them being prepared using MRC-5;
• one vaccine against chicken pox, Varivax®, produced by Merck using WI-38 and MRC-5;
• one vaccine against poliomyelitis, the inactivated polio virus vaccine Poliovax® (Aventis-Pasteur, Fr.) using MRC-5;
• one vaccine against rabies, Imovax®, produced by Aventis Pasteur, harvested from infected human diploid cells, MRC-5 strain;
• one vaccine against smallpox, AC AM 1000, prepared by Acambis using MRC-5, still on trial.

 

[deltex1]

Is there something wrong with this women? or is she really this stupid?

If they're fat enough they make a good footstool...for a while anyway..

 

[deltex1]

Sorry for that...

 

[Jroc]

Vatican Statement on Vaccines Derived From Aborted Human Fetuses

The vaccines that are incriminated today as using human cell lines from aborted foetuses, WI-38 and MRC-5, are the following:7
A) Live vaccines against rubella8:

• the monovalent vaccines against rubella Meruvax®!! (Merck) (U.S.), Rudivax® (Sanofi Pasteur, Fr.), and Ervevax® (RA 27/3) (GlaxoSmithKline, Belgium);
• the combined vaccine MR against rubella and measles, commercialized with the name of M-R-VAX® (Merck, US) and Rudi-Rouvax® (AVP, France);
• the combined vaccine against rubella and mumps marketed under the name of Biavax®!! (Merck, U.S.),
• the combined vaccine MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) against rubella, mumps and measles, marketed under the name of M-M-R® II (Merck, US), R.O.R.®, Trimovax® (Sanofi Pasteur, Fr.), and Priorix® (GlaxoSmithKline UK).

B) Other vaccines, also prepared using human cell lines from aborted foetuses:

• two vaccines against hepatitis A, one produced by Merck (VAQTA), the other one produced by GlaxoSmithKline (HAVRIX), both of them being prepared using MRC-5;
• one vaccine against chicken pox, Varivax®, produced by Merck using WI-38 and MRC-5;
• one vaccine against poliomyelitis, the inactivated polio virus vaccine Poliovax® (Aventis-Pasteur, Fr.) using MRC-5;
• one vaccine against rabies, Imovax®, produced by Aventis Pasteur, harvested from infected human diploid cells, MRC-5 strain;
• one vaccine against smallpox, AC AM 1000, prepared by Acambis using MRC-5, still on trial.

Sorry but the polio vaccine was developed in the 1950s dead babies not involved you're a liar

 

[Camp]

Is there something wrong with this women? or is she really this stupid?

No, she is not stupid. You just failed to do any research and decided to comment about something you know nothing about.
We have advanced from the 1950's.

 

[Stephanie]

and her base of low information voters probably believes her.

these broads in he Democrat party are not FIT to be called women.. they think so little of human life and could give a shit less if you aborted all your OFFSPRING. she has hers (kids/toys/ ornaments) so you kill yours is no skin off her ass. disgusting people in that party. VOTE them OUT come 2016

 

[Jroc]

Is there something wrong with this women? or is she really this stupid?

No, she is not stupid. You just failed to do any research and decided to comment about something you know nothing about.
We have advanced from the 1950's.

Adult stem cells are better baby killer

Advantages of Adult Stem Cells

Both lines of stem cells have an enormous therapeutic potential. While embryonic stem cells offer the potential for wider therapeutic applications, adult stem cells avoid the ethical issues roused by embryonic stem cell research. Therefore, many stem cell therapies are currently being tested using adult stem cells. Additionally, adult stem cells offer the potential for autologous stem cell donation, which may help to avoid issues of immune rejection in certain situations.

It is also known that upon injection into mice with compromised immune systems, undifferentiated embryonic stem cells elicit the formation of a benign tumor called a teratoma. This tumor formation causes scientists to doubt the therapeutic applicability of embryonic stem cells. It is not yet known whether similar results are observed with adult stem cells .

Advantages of Embryonic Stem Cells

The advantages of embryonic stem cells is that they offer one cell source for multiple indications. They provide the potential for a wider variety of applications than do adult stem cells. Additionally, they theoretically have the possibility of being immuno-privileged, due to their highly undifferentiated state. A privileged immune status would remove one of the main barriers of stem cell therapies, as self rejection is one stem cell therapy’s main complications . The idea that embryonic stem cells can be immune privilaged, must be viewed skeptically, however, as this theory has not yet been proven

.


Adult vs. Embryonic

 

[Camp]

Anti freedom folks always use abortion as the default deflection when they are losing an argument. Fuck that. Anti Freedom People are a nuisance.

 

[Jroc]

Anti freedom folks always use abortion as the default deflection when they are losing an argument. Fuck that. Anti Freedom People are a nuisance.

"Freedom" has limits otherwise the government might decide to put idiots like you out of your misery.

 

[konradv]

Adult stem cells are better baby killer

From the article you cited:

Advantages of Embryonic Stem Cells

The advantages of embryonic stem cells is that they offer one cell source for multiple indications. They provide the potential for a wider variety of applications than do adult stem cells. Additionally, they theoretically have the possibility of being immuno-privileged, due to their highly undifferentiated state. A privileged immune status would remove one of the main barriers of stem cell therapies, as self rejection is one stem cell therapy’s main complications.

That proves that what was said ISN'T A LIE. The best you can say is "unproven".

 

[Jroc]

Adult stem cells are better baby killer

From the article you cited:

Advantages of Embryonic Stem Cells

The advantages of embryonic stem cells is that they offer one cell source for multiple indications. They provide the potential for a wider variety of applications than do adult stem cells. Additionally, they theoretically have the possibility of being immuno-privileged, due to their highly undifferentiated state. A privileged immune status would remove one of the main barriers of stem cell therapies, as self rejection is one stem cell therapy’s main complications.

That proves that what was said ISN'T A LIE. The best you can say is "unproven".

Adult stem cells are better they had more success with them ....anyway are harvesting baby parts doesn't have anything to do with vaccines

 

[Vandalshandle]

Vatican Statement on Vaccines Derived From Aborted Human Fetuses

The vaccines that are incriminated today as using human cell lines from aborted foetuses, WI-38 and MRC-5, are the following:7
A) Live vaccines against rubella8:

• the monovalent vaccines against rubella Meruvax®!! (Merck) (U.S.), Rudivax® (Sanofi Pasteur, Fr.), and Ervevax® (RA 27/3) (GlaxoSmithKline, Belgium);
• the combined vaccine MR against rubella and measles, commercialized with the name of M-R-VAX® (Merck, US) and Rudi-Rouvax® (AVP, France);
• the combined vaccine against rubella and mumps marketed under the name of Biavax®!! (Merck, U.S.),
• the combined vaccine MMR (measles, mumps, rubella) against rubella, mumps and measles, marketed under the name of M-M-R® II (Merck, US), R.O.R.®, Trimovax® (Sanofi Pasteur, Fr.), and Priorix® (GlaxoSmithKline UK).

B) Other vaccines, also prepared using human cell lines from aborted foetuses:

• two vaccines against hepatitis A, one produced by Merck (VAQTA), the other one produced by GlaxoSmithKline (HAVRIX), both of them being prepared using MRC-5;
• one vaccine against chicken pox, Varivax®, produced by Merck using WI-38 and MRC-5;
• one vaccine against poliomyelitis, the inactivated polio virus vaccine Poliovax® (Aventis-Pasteur, Fr.) using MRC-5;
• one vaccine against rabies, Imovax®, produced by Aventis Pasteur, harvested from infected human diploid cells, MRC-5 strain;
• one vaccine against smallpox, AC AM 1000, prepared by Acambis using MRC-5, still on trial.

In view of the fact that the RW does not know the difference between a fetus and a baby, tells me that you are, I am afraid, just blowing against the wind.

 

[Sarah G]

Is there something wrong with this women? or is she really this stupid?

Uhm no she isn't stupid, you may be though.

Also another thing that's stupid are the Republican ads out now where they claim to care about issues like schools, jobs, you know things they have NOT been working on since they took the majority in congress.

They're just like us... Yeah right.

 

[jknowgood]

Adult stem cells are better baby killer

From the article you cited:

Advantages of Embryonic Stem Cells

The advantages of embryonic stem cells is that they offer one cell source for multiple indications. They provide the potential for a wider variety of applications than do adult stem cells. Additionally, they theoretically have the possibility of being immuno-privileged, due to their highly undifferentiated state. A privileged immune status would remove one of the main barriers of stem cell therapies, as self rejection is one stem cell therapy’s main complications.

That proves that what was said ISN'T A LIE. The best you can say is "unproven".

What benefits has come from cells from an aborted baby?

 

[Stephanie]

sums them up to a TEE

snip:
Cecil the Lion: Idol for a Child-Killing Culture
Rending robes over one dead lion while millions unborn are torn asunder.

More: Cecil the Lion Prompts Legislation to Curb Importation of Animal Trophies
by Walter Hudson
July 31, 2015 - 6:00 am



We’re better than the people who came before us. That’s the built-in claim embraced by the evolutionary paradigm. We’re more evolved. We’re more developed. We’re more sophisticated. We’re smarter and more capable. We would never suffer atrocities like slavery or human sacrifice. Such horrors are relics of the past, or at least tucked away in the darkest corners of the third world.

The formal term for such assumptions is “the historian’s fallacy,” defined as “when one assumes that decision makers of the past viewed events from the same perspective and having the same information as those subsequently analyzing the decision.” The worst application of the historian’s fallacy occurs when people judge the actions of God recorded in the Old Testament.

Commonly, whenever a debate regarding religion lasts beyond a certain point, someone will point to the violence commanded by the biblical God. He sent the Israelites to wipe out entire nations. How could such a God be good?

The question is asked from a presumption about the circumstances. These nations whom God wished destroyed were upright, peaceful people, we’re to assume. They minded their own business until this vicious Old Testament God came along and unjustly destroyed them.

In truth, however, the nations which God used the Israelites to destroy were the Nazis of their day. The Canaanites were a vile culture that threw their own children into pits of fire as sacrifice to nature and fertility gods, such as Baal or Moloch. They were irredeemable. Their destruction was essential to the survival of God’s people, not just physically, but culturally. If the influence of these heathens survived (as it did due to Israelite disobedience), then it would corrupt the Israelite culture (as it did, again due to Israelite disobedience).

Fast-forward to today. We’re so much better than the Canaanites, right? We don’t cast our children into pits of fire as sacrifice to pagan gods. Right? Consider some evidence on the next page…

all of it here:
Cecil the Lion Idol for a Child-Killing Culture PJ Lifestyle