Ban on high capacity magazines for guns doesn't stop criminals caught with high cap magazines...

2aguy

Diamond Member
Jul 19, 2014
111,975
52,248
2,290
So.....when they created the new law in Baltimore that banned high capacity magazines....they forgot to add ..."If you are criminal...you also can't have high capacity magazines,"......because the criminals apparently have been carrying high capacity magazines in their illegal guns when they have been using them to break the law and commit rape, robbery and murder.....

In fact......."high capacity" magazines.....are now even more popular with criminals...

You anti-gunners are morons.....

Baltimore Cops Confiscating "High-Capacity" Mags Despite the Ban. Who Would've Guessed? - The Truth About Guns

Baltimore Police Are Recovering More Guns Loaded With High-Capacity Magazines, Despite Ban on Sales the headline over at thetrace.org proclaims. Wait. Criminals aren’t respecting the Free State’s ban on standard capacity handgun magazines? What are they? Criminals? It gets better/worse . . .

So far, the ban has done little to stamp out the use of big magazines by criminals, an analysis of law enforcement records by The Trace found.

So...anti-gunners.....can any of you loons explain to us the need to ban standard capacity magazines for normal, law abiding people? The guys they are catching with the magazines...are already criminals with illegal guns........so....care to explain?

From the original story.....

Baltimore Police Are Recovering More Guns Loaded With High-Capacity Magazines, Despite Ban on Sales

Four years ago, Maryland passed some of the toughest gun restrictions in the country, including a ban on the sale or manufacture of ammunition magazines large enough to hold more than 10 rounds. The intent of the law was to curb supplies of so-called high-capacity magazines in places like Baltimore, where at least 189 people died that year in shootings.

So far, the ban has done little to stamp out the use of big magazines by criminals, an analysis of law enforcement records by The Trace found. Baltimore police confiscated nearly 450 guns last year with enough room in the magazine to carry at least 11 rounds — high-capacity, as defined by the state — more than during any period in at least the last seven years.

Twenty-two percent of all recovered firearms were equipped with a high-capacity magazine, a 4 percentage point increase over 2013, the year the ban was adopted.

Baltimore police say larger magazines have surged in popularity among criminals because they can squeeze off more shots without reloading — and increase their odds of a kill.

An investigation by The Baltimore Sun last year found that the number of corpses at the Maryland medical examiner’s office with at least 10 gunshot wounds had doubled in the past decade.

So....Baltimore has some of the strictest gun laws on the books...every single, stupid anti gun law the anti gun morons want.....and what has been the result...?

Last year was the city’s second-deadliest year on record, with 318 homicides. So far in 2017, there has been a 40 percent rise in shootings and homicides.


T.J. Smith, a Baltimore police spokesperson, said it was not uncommon for officers to pull up at crime scenes and find the street littered with spent shell casings.
 
Last edited:
Using your reasoning, why bother making it illegal to rob banks? It doesn't stop bank robbers.
 
2aguy once again invoked a fallacy of the perfect world, that since the law does not end all such violations, then it is a bad law.

This is easily refuted.

One, the law is to punish as well as deter.

Two, OP does not show that the law does not deter.

Thus, OP needs facts (something that the OP hates) to prove the OP's premise.
 
Modifying firearms isn't rocket science. In countries with strong gun control, gangs just manufacture their own weapons. The cold hard reality is that firearms are easily available to anyone that wants them.
 
Using your reasoning, why bother making it illegal to rob banks? It doesn't stop bank robbers.


No....moron. This argument you guys keep trying to make is stupid. No one is against having laws against crimes....real crimes. And committing robbery, rape or murder is a crime...and can already be punished...dittos a felon caught with an illegal gun.....if they felon has a gun, and has a magazine in it...he is already going to jail for having the gun....

The magazine ban only effects the good guy...the guy who is not using his gun to break the law, and who becomes a criminal simply for owning a magazine that holds 11 bullets vs. 10......

That is fucking stupid.....but you are a left wing anti gunner.....so stupidity is part of your DNA.....
 
2aguy once again invoked a fallacy of the perfect world, that since the law does not end all such violations, then it is a bad law.

This is easily refuted.

One, the law is to punish as well as deter.

Two, OP does not show that the law does not deter.

Thus, OP needs facts (something that the OP hates) to prove the OP's premise.


No asswipe...never made that argument...you keep telling people that I am making that argument, and that is a lie.

Again....using a gun to commit a crime gets you put in jail....that is what has to happen....putting a normal, law abiding gun owner in jail because his gun holds more than 10 bullets, even though he did not use the gun to commit rape, robbery or murder is stupid.....

We already have laws that put people in jail if they use a gun to commit an actual crime.....we have laws on the books that allow you to put a felon in jail if they are caught with an illegal gun....

All this law does is create a criminal out of a normal gun owner....which is the point of the law...to harrass normal, law abiding gun owners and to limit their ability to buy a gun.....since a magazine ban is in reality a back door gun ban......and once you assholes get magazines that hold more than 10 rounds, you will be back for the 10 round magazines.....
 
2aguy lies because I have correctly explained what he is doing.

"One, the law is to punish as well as deter.

Two, OP does not show that the law does not deter.

Thus, OP needs facts (something that the OP hates) to prove the OP's premise."

He can't argue the logic, he has not the facts, so he lies.
 
2aguy lies because I have correctly explained what he is doing.

"One, the law is to punish as well as deter.

Two, OP does not show that the law does not deter.

Thus, OP needs facts (something that the OP hates) to prove the OP's premise."

He can't argue the logic, he has not the facts, so he lies.


The increase in gun murder in Baltimore tends to show this moron......

And again, we have laws on the books that say a felon cannot own a gun...they can be arrested.

We have laws on the books that say if you use a gun to commit a real crime, rape, robbery or murder, you can be arrested.

Magazine capacity bans simply make criminals out of normal, law abiding citizens who do not use their guns to commit crimes simply because they have 11 rounds instead of 10 rounds...for this they become felons, lose their 2nd Amendment rights, and their jobs, and more than likely their homes......this is insane.

If someone uses a gun to commit a crime...arrest them. Since criminals are using guns regardless of the law....and we can already lock them up when they do...this law is nothing more than harrassment of normal gun owners.....
 
Using your reasoning, why bother making it illegal to rob banks? It doesn't stop bank robbers.


No....moron. This argument you guys keep trying to make is stupid. No one is against having laws against crimes....real crimes. And committing robbery, rape or murder is a crime...and can already be punished...dittos a felon caught with an illegal gun.....if they felon has a gun, and has a magazine in it...he is already going to jail for having the gun....

The magazine ban only effects the good guy...the guy who is not using his gun to break the law, and who becomes a criminal simply for owning a magazine that holds 11 bullets vs. 10......

That is fucking stupid.....but you are a left wing anti gunner.....so stupidity is part of your DNA.....

Banning the sale of extended magazines reduces their availability to criminals as well. Magazines, as well as almost any other gun part can be manufactured in anyone's garage with simple hand tools. Your arguments are dumb.
 
2aguy lies because I have correctly explained what he is doing.

"One, the law is to punish as well as deter.

Two, OP does not show that the law does not deter.

Thus, OP needs facts (something that the OP hates) to prove the OP's premise."

He can't argue the logic, he has not the facts, so he lies.


The increase in gun murder in Baltimore tends to show this moron......

And again, we have laws on the books that say a felon cannot own a gun...they can be arrested.

We have laws on the books that say if you use a gun to commit a real crime, rape, robbery or murder, you can be arrested.

Magazine capacity bans simply make criminals out of normal, law abiding citizens who do not use their guns to commit crimes simply because they have 11 rounds instead of 10 rounds...for this they become felons, lose their 2nd Amendment rights, and their jobs, and more than likely their homes......this is insane.

If someone uses a gun to commit a crime...arrest them. Since criminals are using guns regardless of the law....and we can already lock them up when they do...this law is nothing more than harrassment of normal gun owners.....


Drinking while driving bans simply make criminals out of normal, law abiding citizens who do not get drunk enough to commit crimes simply because they have 5 beers instead of 2 beers...for this they become felons, lose their freedom to travel rights, and their jobs, and more than likely their homes......this is essentially the claim you are making, and yes, it is insane.

If someone is drunk when they commit a crime...arrest them. Since criminals are drinking and driving regardless of the law....and we can already lock them up when they do...this law is nothing more than harrassment of normal drivers who drink.....
 
2aguy has never thought well at all.

You have not shown us a marked rise in Baltimore in such crimes.

The law is to punish as well as deter, and you have not shown, 2aguy, that either has failed.

And you argue for the efficacy of laws, so when you say they don't work you metaphorically shot yourself in the your tiny dick. (Sassy out you)

No need exists for normal citizens to have a 120 round banana clips: none.

Oh, if someone uses a gun, the cops will arrest them, be not afraid.
 
So.....when they created the new law in Baltimore that banned high capacity magazines....they forgot to add ..."If you are criminal...you also can't have high capacity magazines,"......because the criminals apparently have been carrying high capacity magazines in their illegal guns when they have been using them to break the law and commit rape, robbery and murder.....

In fact......."high capacity" magazines.....are now even more popular with criminals...

You anti-gunners are morons.....

Baltimore Cops Confiscating "High-Capacity" Mags Despite the Ban. Who Would've Guessed? - The Truth About Guns

Baltimore Police Are Recovering More Guns Loaded With High-Capacity Magazines, Despite Ban on Sales the headline over at thetrace.org proclaims. Wait. Criminals aren’t respecting the Free State’s ban on standard capacity handgun magazines? What are they? Criminals? It gets better/worse . . .

So far, the ban has done little to stamp out the use of big magazines by criminals, an analysis of law enforcement records by The Trace found.

So...anti-gunners.....can any of you loons explain to us the need to ban standard capacity magazines for normal, law abiding people? The guys they are catching with the magazines...are already criminals with illegal guns........so....care to explain?

From the original story.....

Baltimore Police Are Recovering More Guns Loaded With High-Capacity Magazines, Despite Ban on Sales

Four years ago, Maryland passed some of the toughest gun restrictions in the country, including a ban on the sale or manufacture of ammunition magazines large enough to hold more than 10 rounds. The intent of the law was to curb supplies of so-called high-capacity magazines in places like Baltimore, where at least 189 people died that year in shootings.

So far, the ban has done little to stamp out the use of big magazines by criminals, an analysis of law enforcement records by The Trace found. Baltimore police confiscated nearly 450 guns last year with enough room in the magazine to carry at least 11 rounds — high-capacity, as defined by the state — more than during any period in at least the last seven years.

Twenty-two percent of all recovered firearms were equipped with a high-capacity magazine, a 4 percentage point increase over 2013, the year the ban was adopted.

Baltimore police say larger magazines have surged in popularity among criminals because they can squeeze off more shots without reloading — and increase their odds of a kill.

An investigation by The Baltimore Sun last year found that the number of corpses at the Maryland medical examiner’s office with at least 10 gunshot wounds had doubled in the past decade.

So....Baltimore has some of the strictest gun laws on the books...every single, stupid anti gun law the anti gun morons want.....and what has been the result...?

Last year was the city’s second-deadliest year on record, with 318 homicides. So far in 2017, there has been a 40 percent rise in shootings and homicides.


T.J. Smith, a Baltimore police spokesperson, said it was not uncommon for officers to pull up at crime scenes and find the street littered with spent shell casings.
Don't need high capacity magazines, just need a car that runs and a knife.
 
2aguy has never thought well at all.

You have not shown us a marked rise in Baltimore in such crimes.

The law is to punish as well as deter, and you have not shown, 2aguy, that either has failed.

And you argue for the efficacy of laws, so when you say they don't work you metaphorically shot yourself in the your tiny dick. (Sassy out you)

No need exists for normal citizens to have a 120 round banana clips: none.

Oh, if someone uses a gun, the cops will arrest them, be not afraid.


Asswipe...you of course lie by omission and misdirection.....we are not talking 120 round magazines here....and you know that...they banned anything over 10 rounds...which makes huge numbers of guns illegal in Baltimore because they hold 11 or more bullets......so if you have a Px4....you are out of luck...your gun holds more than 10...it is now an illegal gun....a gun ban by the backdoor which they understood when they passed this law.....

So there is the normal gun owner, never commits a crime, never uses their gun to commit a crime..with a stroke of the pen, their gun can no longer have 11 -17 rounds of ammo.....while the criminal uses these same guns no matter the penalty...

Asswips like you have turned normal, law abiding gun owners into criminals without them having ever committed a crime...

And as the story shows....gun murder is up in Baltimore by 40%...despite magazine bans, assault weapon bans, gun registration and every other stupid gun laws you morons wanted......

And they could already arrest a felon who had a gun.....without this law...they could already arrest someone who uses a gun to commit a crime...without this law...

It is nothing more than a gun ban by the back door.......
 
2aguy lies because I have correctly explained what he is doing.

"One, the law is to punish as well as deter.

Two, OP does not show that the law does not deter.

Thus, OP needs facts (something that the OP hates) to prove the OP's premise."

He can't argue the logic, he has not the facts, so he lies.


The increase in gun murder in Baltimore tends to show this moron......

And again, we have laws on the books that say a felon cannot own a gun...they can be arrested.

We have laws on the books that say if you use a gun to commit a real crime, rape, robbery or murder, you can be arrested.

Magazine capacity bans simply make criminals out of normal, law abiding citizens who do not use their guns to commit crimes simply because they have 11 rounds instead of 10 rounds...for this they become felons, lose their 2nd Amendment rights, and their jobs, and more than likely their homes......this is insane.

If someone uses a gun to commit a crime...arrest them. Since criminals are using guns regardless of the law....and we can already lock them up when they do...this law is nothing more than harrassment of normal gun owners.....


Drinking while driving bans simply make criminals out of normal, law abiding citizens who do not get drunk enough to commit crimes simply because they have 5 beers instead of 2 beers...for this they become felons, lose their freedom to travel rights, and their jobs, and more than likely their homes......this is essentially the claim you are making, and yes, it is insane.

If someone is drunk when they commit a crime...arrest them. Since criminals are drinking and driving regardless of the law....and we can already lock them up when they do...this law is nothing more than harrassment of normal drivers who drink.....


No moron.....it isn't the same thing...you aren't even comparing apples to oranges...

What they have done is say that merely owning a can of bear is illegal......that is what they have done with the magazine ban you moron.....

And to the rest of your post...you simply proved my point...we have laws for drunk drivers...you morons just made it illegal for people to have a can of beer in their home......
 
2aguy ^^^ has failed, yet again, to carry his case to successful conclusion.

Let's close this thread and mark it as a minus.
 
2aguy ^^^ has failed, yet again, to carry his case to successful conclusion.

Let's close this thread and mark it as a minus.

He never does. He always repeats the same crap, because that's what the NRA programmed him to do, and when his crap is shot down, he always says "No, that's not the same thing". He's a waste of time.
 
You morons know that non of what I post comes from the NRA.....they are a good source, but I use you god...government for most of my posts.....I post gun self defense studies from your high priests...bill "the rapist" clinton and obama.......in addition to the other gun self defense studies....

For accidental gun injuries..I post from you god, government, again, the CDC...which shows that accidental gun deaths have gone down....way down, as we went from 200 million guns in private hands to 357-400 million guns in private hands with over 15 million people carrying guns for self defense.......at the lowest levels since the early 1900s....

And from your god, government, the FBI, I take gun murder rates...which shows that gun murder has been going down in the same time period......

Pew research, not the NRA....shows that as we went from 4.7 million AMericans carrying guns for self defense in 1997 to over 15 million people carrying guns for self defense in 2016...our gun murder rate went down 49%....and our violent crime rate went down 75%........

The actual facts, truth and reality of Americans owning and carrying guns for self defense show that you have no idea what you are talking about in any category of the gun debate......that is why you always lamely, robotically recite anti gun lies about the NRA and gun owners....

The core tenet of the anti gun morons, like you, is that more guns in more hands = more gun violence and death......and that is not true...the exact opposite is true..and you have no way to refute it...since every single one of the government agencies you worship show you are wrong....
 

Forum List

Back
Top