- Banned
- #881
So...what have YOU actively done to get public accomodation laws repealed?Virtually no one if anyone arguing the baker should not be forced to bake the cake is arguing that the gay photographer should be forced to work for the baker, and anyone who tried arguing that would be viewed the same as you arguing it's a legitimate use of government force to compel a citizen to bake a cake. This is a vacuous argument.
Really you should try that again in English...
But if I got it correctly...
So we agree, Public Accommodation laws should be repealed right?
That if the baker can refuse to serve gays because they are gay that gays can refuse Christians because of their specific religious stance?
That one can discriminate but the other can't (under the law), is readily apparent unequal treatment under the law.
The remedy then is:
(a) require each to provide equal service to the other, or
(b) neither is required to provide service to the other.
As it is now one gets to discriminate but the other is barred.
>>>>
We agree that all public accommodation laws should be repealed. We do not agree that until they are then we should add more legislation which is unnecessary and therefore simply an excuse for government to exert power. Why would I possibly agree that more unnecessary government legislation is good? Why would you think that?
Seawytch wants it for validation. She obviously has no problem getting a cake baked. She is just saying if they have it, she wants it too.
The true oppressed minority in this country are achievers who fund the government and provide the jobs. If you want to make a difference, focus on that real problem, not contrived ones.