brneyedgrl80
Member
Nah... I admit that there is a positive. I think insein and I were discussing this some where else.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Originally posted by brneyedgrl80
Nah... I admit that there is a positive. I think insein and I were discussing this some where else.
Originally posted by MrMarbles
Originally posted by MrMarbles
Swimming pools aren't designed specifically to kill people.
Without cars society, in at least NA, would crumble, and aren't designed specifically to kill people.
Bicicycles aren't designed specifically to kill people.
Knifes, well it will be knid of hard to eat meat without out one, but NA society dose eat to much anyway, so sure, outlaw knives.
Plus, I just don't want average joe to own a gun, you would still have police and the army to protect you. Besides the average street cop in england don't carry guns, and there is'nt thousands of people dying on the streets there.
Originally posted by MrMarbles
Do all these things, terrorists, murderous posses, secret police, etc., happen to you guys on a regular basis? If it did to me, maybe I would want to carry a gun. But they don't, so I don't need to.
Do you guys know the concept of a "arms race". Basically it means when nation X begins to produce more weapons then nation Y, nation Y begins to produce more aswell, completely counteracting the effects nation X where trying to make by producing more weapoms. This senario leads to enevitable to chaos.
Now nation X is the general public. The general public all acquire weapons, this makes nation Y, criminals, need more and bigger weapons to counter act that of the public.
If everyone has a gun, then bad guys will have shotguns, if everyone has shotguns, badguys will have machine guns, if everyone has machine guns, bad guys will have tanks, if everyone has tanks, bad guy will have missles, etc., etc., etc.
Next thing you know, everyone will have tactical nukes, and the world would be destoyed.
No guns, except for those whose job it is to keep order.
Originally posted by MrMarbles
Kent State, May 4, 1970: America Kills Its Children
They do use stuff like that. It might not be specifically dynamite, but they use stuff like C4, TNT, fertilizer bombs (like OKC), and other stuff.We already have dynamite and Ricin, why aren't terroeists using them now?
As far as killing lots of people goes, I would agree that explosives are more effective than guns. But I don't know about Ricin. It's good for assassinations by poisoning people but for killing lots of people, I don't think it's very useful.They are much more affective then guns.
Originally posted by MrMarbles
So then why didn't anyone do anything about it? Aren't your trained militias there it stop is kind of power abuse. You want guns to overthrow your gov't when it is nessecary, yet nothing happened. They killed innocent students, where was the uprising?
Originally posted by tim_duncan2000
They do use stuff like that. It might not be specifically dynamite, but they use stuff like C4, TNT, fertilizer bombs (like OKC), and other stuff. As far as killing lots of people goes, I would agree that explosives are more effective than guns. But I don't know about Ricin. It's good for assassinations by poisoning people but for killing lots of people, I don't think it's very useful.
It can be in the form of a powder, a mist, or a pellet or it can be dissolved in water or weak acid. Once ricin gets inside the cells of a persons body, it prevents those cells from making the proteins they need. Without those proteins, the cells die; and eventually death may occur. Effects of ricin poisoning depend on whether ricin was inhaled, ingested or injected.