Backward a hundred years.

[MIPS]

BACKWARD A HUNDRED YEARS.

If a Palin or Brown supported by the tea party extremist get in office in 2012 they will take this country back a hundred years. They will take away social security, Medicare and Medicaid, welfare, SCHIP and civil rights of minorities. Then you will see a real revolution like this country have never seen before.
Right wing nuts and village idiots, Rush and FOXNEWS hate Obama more than they love this country, their granny or their children. Hate kind of like terrorist who hate us more then they love life.

LOL, Progressive irrational, fear mongering at it's best.

Trust me it isn't Palin or Brown that you progressives need to be afraid of, it's the American People that you need to fear, the jig is up.

I don't think the progressives in this country fear the 500 or 600 people that paid $549.00 to watch Sarah Palin read answers off of her hand. The Tea Partiers proved beyond a shadow of a doubt what mental midgets they are by not demanding a refund.

Sure, sure whatever you say pal and today's watch words are .....

"Watch what happens in November"

 

[Hellokitty]

BACKWARD A HUNDRED YEARS.

If a Palin or Brown supported by the tea party extremist get in office in 2012 they will take this country back a hundred years. They will take away social security, Medicare and Medicaid, welfare, SCHIP and civil rights of minorities. Then you will see a real revolution like this country have never seen before.
Right wing nuts and village idiots, Rush and FOXNEWS hate Obama more than they love this country, their granny or their children. Hate kind of like terrorist who hate us more then they love life.

LOL, Progressive irrational, fear mongering at it's best.

Trust me it isn't Palin or Brown that you progressives need to be afraid of, it's the American People that you need to fear, the jig is up.

I don't think the progressives in this country fear the 500 or 600 people that paid $549.00 to watch Sarah Palin read answers off of her hand. The Tea Partiers proved beyond a shadow of a doubt what mental midgets they are by not demanding a refund.

Palin's speech has received more response then Obama's SOTU address. I don't recall the dem's going after any other so called small movement as they are going after the TP.
The dem's didn't have much to say about Ron Paul's convention not because they agreed with him, but because they did not perceive him as a threat.
The left fears Palin because she is able to relate to masses of people much in the same way as Obama only with a different message. They also see she is able to walk away from bad press even more popular. The smartest thing the left could do is ignore Palin, but their arrogance and elitist attitude wont let them.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Civil Rights Act of 1964 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nice try , it was regional the southerners voted against in High numbers no matter their party.

Notherners voted for it in high numbers no matter their party.


The original House version:

Southern Democrats: 7-87 (7%-93%)
Southern Republicans: 0-10 (0%-100%)
Northern Democrats: 145-9 (94%-6%)
Northern Republicans: 138-24 (85%-15%)
The Senate version:

Southern Democrats: 1-20 (5%-95%) (only Senator Ralph Yarborough of Texas voted in favor)
Southern Republicans: 0-1 (0%-100%) (this was Senator John Tower of Texas)
Northern Democrats: 45-1 (98%-2%) (only Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia opposed the measure)
Northern Republicans: 27-5 (84%-16%) (Senators Barry Goldwater of Arizona, Bourke Hickenlooper of Iowa, Edwin L. Mechem of New Mexico, Milward L. Simpson of Wyoming, and Norris H. Cotton of New Hampshire opposed the measure)

Dems controlled the South and rather than free their slaves, they seceded from the Union, remember?

 

[slackjawed]

Civil Rights Act of 1964 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nice try , it was regional the southerners voted against in High numbers no matter their party.

Notherners voted for it in high numbers no matter their party.


The original House version:

Southern Democrats: 7-87 (7%-93%)
Southern Republicans: 0-10 (0%-100%)
Northern Democrats: 145-9 (94%-6%)
Northern Republicans: 138-24 (85%-15%)
The Senate version:

Southern Democrats: 1-20 (5%-95%) (only Senator Ralph Yarborough of Texas voted in favor)
Southern Republicans: 0-1 (0%-100%) (this was Senator John Tower of Texas)
Northern Democrats: 45-1 (98%-2%) (only Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia opposed the measure)
Northern Republicans: 27-5 (84%-16%) (Senators Barry Goldwater of Arizona, Bourke Hickenlooper of Iowa, Edwin L. Mechem of New Mexico, Milward L. Simpson of Wyoming, and Norris H. Cotton of New Hampshire opposed the measure)

Yep, and it was Sen Byrd that filibustered it, at least til he had to pee and the filibuster ended.

 

[Truthmatters]

Sarah will run tea party and split the R vote.

 

[WillowTree]

BACKWARD A HUNDRED YEARS.

If a Palin or Brown supported by the tea party extremist get in office in 2012 they will take this country back a hundred years. They will take away social security, Medicare and Medicaid, welfare, SCHIP and civil rights of minorities. Then you will see a real revolution like this country have never seen before.
Right wing nuts and village idiots, Rush and FOXNEWS hate Obama more than they love this country, their granny or their children. Hate kind of like terrorist who hate us more then they love life.

Nothing wrong with getting rid of Social Security.

It's the biggest government scam ever.

Social Security would be fine if the robber barons aka congress would stop robbing the till.

 

[Truthmatters]

Civil Rights Act of 1964 - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Nice try , it was regional the southerners voted against in High numbers no matter their party.

Notherners voted for it in high numbers no matter their party.


The original House version:

Southern Democrats: 7-87 (7%-93%)
Southern Republicans: 0-10 (0%-100%)
Northern Democrats: 145-9 (94%-6%)
Northern Republicans: 138-24 (85%-15%)
The Senate version:

Southern Democrats: 1-20 (5%-95%) (only Senator Ralph Yarborough of Texas voted in favor)
Southern Republicans: 0-1 (0%-100%) (this was Senator John Tower of Texas)
Northern Democrats: 45-1 (98%-2%) (only Senator Robert Byrd of West Virginia opposed the measure)
Northern Republicans: 27-5 (84%-16%) (Senators Barry Goldwater of Arizona, Bourke Hickenlooper of Iowa, Edwin L. Mechem of New Mexico, Milward L. Simpson of Wyoming, and Norris H. Cotton of New Hampshire opposed the measure)

This bill changed the R and dem partys forever.

they are different parties now and anyone who pretends differntly is a fool

 

[Truthmatters]

BACKWARD A HUNDRED YEARS.

If a Palin or Brown supported by the tea party extremist get in office in 2012 they will take this country back a hundred years. They will take away social security, Medicare and Medicaid, welfare, SCHIP and civil rights of minorities. Then you will see a real revolution like this country have never seen before.
Right wing nuts and village idiots, Rush and FOXNEWS hate Obama more than they love this country, their granny or their children. Hate kind of like terrorist who hate us more then they love life.

Nothing wrong with getting rid of Social Security.

It's the biggest government scam ever.

Social Security would be fine if the robber barons aka congress would stop robbing the till.

But I thought you would think SS was a socialist plot?

 

[CrusaderFrank]

LOL, Progressive irrational, fear mongering at it's best.

Trust me it isn't Palin or Brown that you progressives need to be afraid of, it's the American People that you need to fear, the jig is up.

I don't think the progressives in this country fear the 500 or 600 people that paid $549.00 to watch Sarah Palin read answers off of her hand. The Tea Partiers proved beyond a shadow of a doubt what mental midgets they are by not demanding a refund.

Palin's speech has received more response then Obama's SOTU address. I don't recall the dem's going after any other so called small movement as they are going after the TP.
The dem's didn't have much to say about Ron Paul's convention not because they agreed with him, but because they did not perceive him as a threat.
The left fears Palin because she is able to relate to masses of people much in the same way as Obama only with a different message. They also see she is able to walk away from bad press even more popular. The smartest thing the left could do is ignore Palin, but their arrogance and elitist attitude wont let them.

PDS drives them insane

 

[slackjawed]

Sarah will run tea party and split the R vote.

I would expect that would be accurate most of the time. Right now the anger against incumbents is so high, that may or may not hold true. It will be interesting to watch at any rate. The Tea Party vote may just include some fed up democrats as well.

After Mass, if I was a democrat I wouldn't be so smug, and would find something other than the same old party talking points to spout off about.
If I was a republican, I would also scrap the same tired BS and try to reorient the party, including the talking points.

It looks to me like people are fed up with both parties.

It will be interesting to see if your prediction comes true.

 

[VaYank5150]

LOL, Progressive irrational, fear mongering at it's best.

Trust me it isn't Palin or Brown that you progressives need to be afraid of, it's the American People that you need to fear, the jig is up.

I don't think the progressives in this country fear the 500 or 600 people that paid $549.00 to watch Sarah Palin read answers off of her hand. The Tea Partiers proved beyond a shadow of a doubt what mental midgets they are by not demanding a refund.

Palin's speech has received more response then Obama's SOTU address. I don't recall the dem's going after any other so called small movement as they are going after the TP.
The dem's didn't have much to say about Ron Paul's convention not because they agreed with him, but because they did not perceive him as a threat.
The left fears Palin because she is able to relate to masses of people much in the same way as Obama only with a different message. They also see she is able to walk away from bad press even more popular. The smartest thing the left could do is ignore Palin, but their arrogance and elitist attitude wont let them.

Have you been paying attention to WHY her speech has received such a response? Is it because Palin had an epiphany? Is it because she said something NEW and exciting that hadn't been contained in one of her old stump speeches? No. It's because she looked like a bimbo reading answers scribbled on her hand. If you feel this causes her opponents to be fearful of her, then you are EXACTLY the audience she is looking for. Go buy another one of her books. I hear they are now on overstock.

 

[Hellokitty]

I don't think the progressives in this country fear the 500 or 600 people that paid $549.00 to watch Sarah Palin read answers off of her hand. The Tea Partiers proved beyond a shadow of a doubt what mental midgets they are by not demanding a refund.

Palin's speech has received more response then Obama's SOTU address. I don't recall the dem's going after any other so called small movement as they are going after the TP.
The dem's didn't have much to say about Ron Paul's convention not because they agreed with him, but because they did not perceive him as a threat.
The left fears Palin because she is able to relate to masses of people much in the same way as Obama only with a different message. They also see she is able to walk away from bad press even more popular. The smartest thing the left could do is ignore Palin, but their arrogance and elitist attitude wont let them.

Have you been paying attention to WHY her speech has received such a response? Is it because Palin had an epiphany? Is it because she said something NEW and exciting that hadn't been contained in one of her old stump speeches? No. It's because she looked like a bimbo reading answers scribbled on her hand. If you feel this causes her opponents to be fearful of her, then you are EXACTLY the audience she is looking for. Go buy another one of her books. I hear they are now on overstock.

 

[Joe Steel]

We need to move the country back a hundred years and repeal all the progressive policies that are turning this country into a nanny state full of whining slackers.

Teddy Roosevelt signed the Food and Drugs Act of 1906 to stop the abuses of food and drug manufacturers. Would you like to abbrograte that and all the othe consumer protections? Before the Act, milk producer regularly diliuted milk with water then added chalk to make the color look right. How would you like to drink a nice be glass of watery chalk?

 

[MIPS]

Teddy Roosevelt signed the Food and Drugs Act of 1906 to stop the abuses of food and drug manufacturers. Would you like to abbrograte that and all the othe consumer protections? Before the Act, milk producer regularly diliuted milk with water then added chalk to make the color look right. How would you like to drink a nice be glass of watery chalk?

Perhaps you don't realize this but it's no longer 1906, things have changed just a tad since then and remarkably many of those changes have empowered consumers with a whole new suite of tools to evaluate their consumption choices all on their own.

It might be a bit mind boggling to you but people are actually capable of making their own choices and living with the consequences of those choices without big brother protecting them from themselves, in fact individuals tend to do a much better job of it when not hindered with any sense of dependency on government.

 

[WillowTree]

I don't think the progressives in this country fear the 500 or 600 people that paid $549.00 to watch Sarah Palin read answers off of her hand. The Tea Partiers proved beyond a shadow of a doubt what mental midgets they are by not demanding a refund.

Palin's speech has received more response then Obama's SOTU address. I don't recall the dem's going after any other so called small movement as they are going after the TP.
The dem's didn't have much to say about Ron Paul's convention not because they agreed with him, but because they did not perceive him as a threat.
The left fears Palin because she is able to relate to masses of people much in the same way as Obama only with a different message. They also see she is able to walk away from bad press even more popular. The smartest thing the left could do is ignore Palin, but their arrogance and elitist attitude wont let them.

Have you been paying attention to WHY her speech has received such a response? Is it because Palin had an epiphany? Is it because she said something NEW and exciting that hadn't been contained in one of her old stump speeches? No. It's because she looked like a bimbo reading answers scribbled on her hand. If you feel this causes her opponents to be fearful of her, then you are EXACTLY the audience she is looking for. Go buy another one of her books. I hear they are now on overstock.

You guys keep telling yourselves that. Just like you didn't see or didn't hear the "tea party" people last summer! Ayup!

 

[VaYank5150]

Palin's speech has received more response then Obama's SOTU address. I don't recall the dem's going after any other so called small movement as they are going after the TP.
The dem's didn't have much to say about Ron Paul's convention not because they agreed with him, but because they did not perceive him as a threat.
The left fears Palin because she is able to relate to masses of people much in the same way as Obama only with a different message. They also see she is able to walk away from bad press even more popular. The smartest thing the left could do is ignore Palin, but their arrogance and elitist attitude wont let them.

Have you been paying attention to WHY her speech has received such a response? Is it because Palin had an epiphany? Is it because she said something NEW and exciting that hadn't been contained in one of her old stump speeches? No. It's because she looked like a bimbo reading answers scribbled on her hand. If you feel this causes her opponents to be fearful of her, then you are EXACTLY the audience she is looking for. Go buy another one of her books. I hear they are now on overstock.

You guys keep telling yourselves that. Just like you didn't see or didn't hear the "tea party" people last summer! Ayup!

Oh we saw them. Their signs are what doomed them. Ayuh!

 

[Kex]

Bimbo from Wasilla doesn't stand a chance. That's why it is beneficial to have her on a ticket in 2012.

 

[Truthmatters]

Teddy Roosevelt signed the Food and Drugs Act of 1906 to stop the abuses of food and drug manufacturers. Would you like to abbrograte that and all the othe consumer protections? Before the Act, milk producer regularly diliuted milk with water then added chalk to make the color look right. How would you like to drink a nice be glass of watery chalk?

Perhaps you don't realize this but it's no longer 1906, things have changed just a tad since then and remarkably many of those changes have empowered consumers with a whole new suite of tools to evaluate their consumption choices all on their own.

It might be a bit mind boggling to you but people are actually capable of making their own choices and living with the consequences of those choices without big brother protecting them from themselves, in fact individuals tend to do a much better job of it when not hindered with any sense of dependency on government.

They have changed because there are LAWS protecting people against this typw of fraud.

Why is it you nuts insist on thinking that completely free markets produce no abuse?

 

[Kex]

Teddy Roosevelt signed the Food and Drugs Act of 1906 to stop the abuses of food and drug manufacturers. Would you like to abbrograte that and all the othe consumer protections? Before the Act, milk producer regularly diliuted milk with water then added chalk to make the color look right. How would you like to drink a nice be glass of watery chalk?

Perhaps you don't realize this but it's no longer 1906, things have changed just a tad since then and remarkably many of those changes have empowered consumers with a whole new suite of tools to evaluate their consumption choices all on their own.

It might be a bit mind boggling to you but people are actually capable of making their own choices and living with the consequences of those choices without big brother protecting them from themselves, in fact individuals tend to do a much better job of it when not hindered with any sense of dependency on government.

They have changed because there are LAWS protecting people against this typw of fraud.

Why is it you nuts insist on thinking that completely free markets produce no abuse?

Nutrition facts were put there by Jesus.

 

[Avatar4321]

You idiots do realize that:

A) No one has suggested that the government rescind the Food and Drug Act. I sure wouldn't because it clearly falls within the Interstate commerce clause.

B) 1906 was more than 100 years ago.