- Thread starter
- #21
ACT gay marriage law is ruled invalid by high court of Australia
ACT gay marriage law is ruled invalid by high court of Australia | Society | theguardian.com
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The Federal Government has no right interfering in the will of the people. The majority of Australians support same sex marriage, and if Abbott doesn't like it, he can go and suck a dick.
If the majority of the people support same sex marriage, why did your voters vote Abbott in by an overwhelming majority?
Seriously? Are you so fucking new to this you don't know how this works?All I have to say is Proposition 8
Now what you fucking hack?
Proposition 8 no longer exists.
Now what you fucking hater?
What happen to the will of the people?
The majority wanted it.
Your words, OR would you like to retract what you said.Seriously? Are you so fucking new to this you don't know how this works?Proposition 8 no longer exists.
Now what you fucking hater?
What happen to the will of the people?
The majority wanted it.
If the majority want it so badly, then amend the Constitution to allow discrimination based on sexual orientation.
See how simple that is?
I think you mean: Now you know what happens when the will of the majority is deemed unconstitutional.
Your words, OR would you like to retract what you said.Seriously? Are you so fucking new to this you don't know how this works?What happen to the will of the people?
The majority wanted it.
If the majority want it so badly, then amend the Constitution to allow discrimination based on sexual orientation.
See how simple that is?
I think you mean: Now you know what happens when the will of the majority is deemed unconstitutional.
Your words, OR would you like to retract what you said.Seriously? Are you so fucking new to this you don't know how this works?
If the majority want it so badly, then amend the Constitution to allow discrimination based on sexual orientation.
See how simple that is?
I think you mean: Now you know what happens when the will of the majority is deemed unconstitutional.
Oh my god, seriously? You seemed to be a little smarter than ShootSpeeders but now I'm not so sure.
The will of the majority was deemed unconstitutional in the Prop 8 case because the will of the majority hasn't amended the Constitution to discriminate based on sexual orientation yet.
Amend the Constitution first to allow discrimination against gays, then pass local laws that discriminate against gays.
It's really not that hard. You do know how the government works?
It's not me they disagree with, it's the Constitution. The will of the majority has to change the Constitution first before they can pass laws against gays.Your words, OR would you like to retract what you said.
Oh my god, seriously? You seemed to be a little smarter than ShootSpeeders but now I'm not so sure.
The will of the majority was deemed unconstitutional in the Prop 8 case because the will of the majority hasn't amended the Constitution to discriminate based on sexual orientation yet.
Amend the Constitution first to allow discrimination against gays, then pass local laws that discriminate against gays.
It's really not that hard. You do know how the government works?
In other words the will of the majority can go pound sand if they don't agree with you?
GOT IT.
It's not me they disagree with, it's the Constitution. The will of the majority has to change the Constitution first before they can pass laws against gays.Oh my god, seriously? You seemed to be a little smarter than ShootSpeeders but now I'm not so sure.
The will of the majority was deemed unconstitutional in the Prop 8 case because the will of the majority hasn't amended the Constitution to discriminate based on sexual orientation yet.
Amend the Constitution first to allow discrimination against gays, then pass local laws that discriminate against gays.
It's really not that hard. You do know how the government works?
In other words the will of the majority can go pound sand if they don't agree with you?
GOT IT.
It's not me they disagree with, it's the Constitution. The will of the majority has to change the Constitution first before they can pass laws against gays.In other words the will of the majority can go pound sand if they don't agree with you?
GOT IT.
The people of California said no to gay marriage passage of Prop 8 Judge says hell no and tells the majority no.
Do you not see the hypocrisy in your position?
It's not me they disagree with, it's the Constitution. The will of the majority has to change the Constitution first before they can pass laws against gays.
The people of California said no to gay marriage passage of Prop 8 Judge says hell no and tells the majority no.
Do you not see the hypocrisy in your position?
Nope. That's the way the law works. Don't like it? Change the law.
I don't care what OZ does but poop pushers should not be allowed to marry in my country. They can move to France or somewhere gay like that.
Faggots and the right to pack fudge aren't mentioned in the U.S. Constitution.I don't care what OZ does but poop pushers should not be allowed to marry in my country. They can move to France or somewhere gay like that.
Then go live in Iran or Russia because, like it or not, the US has the Constitution and you will never change that.
The Federal Government has no right interfering in the will of the people. The majority of Australians support same sex marriage, and if Abbott doesn't like it, he can go and suck a dick.
If the majority of the people support same sex marriage, why did your voters vote Abbott in by an overwhelming majority?