Atomic Number versus Atomic Mass

Discussion in 'Science and Technology' started by webplodder, Feb 22, 2011.

  1. webplodder
    Offline

    webplodder Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2011
    Messages:
    5
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1
    What is the difference between atomic number and atomic mass?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. Ernie S.
    Offline

    Ernie S. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2010
    Messages:
    34,367
    Thanks Received:
    8,043
    Trophy Points:
    1,340
    Location:
    Sweet Home Alabama
    Ratings:
    +13,814
    Atomic number is the # of protons in an atom. Atomic mass is the number of protons plus the number of neutrons. This is your first post on a political message board???? You lost?
     
    Last edited: Feb 22, 2011
  3. xsited1
    Offline

    xsited1 Agent P

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    17,750
    Thanks Received:
    5,291
    Trophy Points:
    198
    Location:
    Little Rock, AR
    Ratings:
    +5,303
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  4. webplodder
    Offline

    webplodder Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2011
    Messages:
    5
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1


    Ah, I see, ty.

    Lost? I don't think so, why?
     
  5. webplodder
    Offline

    webplodder Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2011
    Messages:
    5
    Thanks Received:
    1
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1
    Thanks for the link xsited. :clap2:
     
  6. Mad Scientist
    Offline

    Mad Scientist Feels Good!

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    24,196
    Thanks Received:
    5,260
    Trophy Points:
    270
    Ratings:
    +8,158
    You joined a message board just to ask that question? :confused:
     
  7. Ernie S.
    Offline

    Ernie S. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2010
    Messages:
    34,367
    Thanks Received:
    8,043
    Trophy Points:
    1,340
    Location:
    Sweet Home Alabama
    Ratings:
    +13,814
    There are hundreds of science forums, Yahoo answer type places, yet you joined a primarily political discussion message board and your first post is a high school chemistry question. You seem lost to me.
     
  8. editec
    Offline

    editec Mr. Forgot-it-All

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    41,426
    Thanks Received:
    5,595
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +5,630
    We can easily make this thread into a debate.

    Surely one of our resident anti-science/anti-intellectual posters here can find some reason to explain to us that the science behind atomic theory is all hokeum
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  9. Ernie S.
    Offline

    Ernie S. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2010
    Messages:
    34,367
    Thanks Received:
    8,043
    Trophy Points:
    1,340
    Location:
    Sweet Home Alabama
    Ratings:
    +13,814
    I know of no one who doesn't believe in basic chemistry.

    fail.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  10. konradv
    Offline

    konradv Gold Member

    Joined:
    Mar 23, 2010
    Messages:
    24,297
    Thanks Received:
    2,869
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    Baltimore
    Ratings:
    +6,878
    Well recently there was a discussion that there could be some naturally occuring elements that haven't been discovered yet. Apparently, there are some people here that don't understand basic chemistry. Except for Technetium which is the lowest weight element with no stable isotopes and has never been found naturally, the only other possible elements are high-weight, inherently unstable and very, very short-lived. Despite all those very well known facts, I was called close-minded for suggesting that there were no new elements to be found!
     

Share This Page