ARIZONA--infringes on Free Speech--Protest we'll seize your property.

[ABikerSailor]

Anyone claiming they will TAKE YOUR SHIT for PROTESTING is a straight up fucking liar.

Guess you missed this little news article from the Arizona Capital Times.........

Claiming people are being paid to riot, Republican state senators voted Wednesday to give police new power to arrest anyone who is involved in a peaceful demonstration that may turn bad — even before anything actually happened.


SB1142 expands the state’s racketeering laws, now aimed at organized crime, to also include rioting. And it redefines what constitutes rioting to include actions that result in damage to the property of others.


But the real heart of the legislation is what Democrats say is the guilt by association — and giving the government the right to criminally prosecute and seize the assets of everyone who planned a protest and everyone who participated. And what’s worse, said Sen. Steve Farley, D-Tucson, is that the person who may have broken a window, triggering the claim there was a riot, might actually not be a member of the group but someone from the other side.


Sen. Martin Quezada, D-Phoenix, acknowledged that sometimes what’s planned as a peaceful demonstration can go south.


“When people want to express themselves as a group during a time of turmoil, during a time of controversy, during a time of high emotions, that’s exactly when people gather as a community,’’ he said. “Sometimes they yell, sometimes they scream, sometimes they do go too far.’’


Quezada said, though, that everything that constitutes rioting already is a crime, ranging from assault to criminal damage, and those responsible can be individually prosecuted. He said the purpose of this bill appears to be designed to chill the First Amendment rights of people to decide to demonstrate in the first place for fear something could wrong.

http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2017/02/22/arizona-senate-crackdown-on-protests/

Isn't the rent-a-riot shit that Soros is engaging in organized crime? Isn't it terrorism in reality? RICO laws SHOULD be used against the fascist thugs on the Soros payroll.

You know, I hear you guys saying that Soros is the shadow behind the protests, and you think that he is paying them to do so, but you guys never post a link to prove your claims.

 

[GaryDog]

[
Calm down snowflake. You still have the right to spout all the false nonsense you want.

Not on a college campus.

Intellectual curiosity is forbidden by the fascist left.

Intellectual curiosity? Like the kind Yolo Minneapolis or whatever the fuck his name exhibits? That dude is an overpaid troll. And you're a troll for free. How's that feel, dipshit? At least he had the sense to get paid. What's your problem? Too stupid?

 

[GaryDog]

Anyone claiming they will TAKE YOUR SHIT for PROTESTING is a straight up fucking liar.

Guess you missed this little news article from the Arizona Capital Times.........

Claiming people are being paid to riot, Republican state senators voted Wednesday to give police new power to arrest anyone who is involved in a peaceful demonstration that may turn bad — even before anything actually happened.


SB1142 expands the state’s racketeering laws, now aimed at organized crime, to also include rioting. And it redefines what constitutes rioting to include actions that result in damage to the property of others.


But the real heart of the legislation is what Democrats say is the guilt by association — and giving the government the right to criminally prosecute and seize the assets of everyone who planned a protest and everyone who participated. And what’s worse, said Sen. Steve Farley, D-Tucson, is that the person who may have broken a window, triggering the claim there was a riot, might actually not be a member of the group but someone from the other side.


Sen. Martin Quezada, D-Phoenix, acknowledged that sometimes what’s planned as a peaceful demonstration can go south.


“When people want to express themselves as a group during a time of turmoil, during a time of controversy, during a time of high emotions, that’s exactly when people gather as a community,’’ he said. “Sometimes they yell, sometimes they scream, sometimes they do go too far.’’


Quezada said, though, that everything that constitutes rioting already is a crime, ranging from assault to criminal damage, and those responsible can be individually prosecuted. He said the purpose of this bill appears to be designed to chill the First Amendment rights of people to decide to demonstrate in the first place for fear something could wrong.

http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2017/02/22/arizona-senate-crackdown-on-protests/

Isn't the rent-a-riot shit that Soros is engaging in organized crime? Isn't it terrorism in reality? RICO laws SHOULD be used against the fascist thugs on the Soros payroll.

Sure it is. All you need is evidence.

 

[oreo]

Just when you think the 4th Reich of the Republican party can't get any worse. Arizona comes up with this law. It's to oppress free speech in this country. Protesters can now be arrested and their property seized if a protest turns violent, even though they may not be involved in the violence.

"Arizona’s police officers will be able to arrest and seize the assets of any protest attendee, even before any crime or riot has taken place, under a new law voted through by state senators on Wednesday.

The legislation was originally established for racketeering but was expanded in definition to include rioting, allowing for the prosecution of everyone planned or participated in a protest that turns violent.

Democrats have criticized the bill, which allows demonstrators to be arrested and have their property seized. The legislation does not require discrimination as to who may have, for example, thrown a punch in a crowd or broken a window. As soon as a riotous action has occurred, all protesters are deemed broadly associated and therefore guilty.

Further to that, due to processes afforded authorities who investigate racketeering and the renewed definition of rioting, police are permitted to preemptively arrest those planning a protest."
New Arizona 'riot' law lets police arrest peaceful protesters—and seize their property

The 4th Reich of the Republican party is in full swing with Trump in office. Make certain they pay hell for it in 2018 and 2020.

Do you think this is directly aimed at your Fuhrer, Herr Soros?

Using racketeering laws against the rent a mob activities of you fascist thugs?

If there's protesters being paid someone is blowing trillions on it--LOL

This is the woman's march the day after the inauguration, if you want to see what was going on in your home state go to this link. (They were in the millions.)
Woman's march pictures

I really don't think someone is paying all these people $10 bucks an hour to protest--LOL

They're not paid they're PISSED.

BINGO

This is the closest thing America has had to a fascist dictator in charge, and people are SURPRISED that protests are so virulent?

And what a shock that they want laws to crack down on it. Fuck anyone who opposes protest.

Someone supports a centrally planned and managed economy like Hitler and Mussolini had.

It ain't Trump, it's your Fuhrer, Herr Soros.

Someone advocates for infringement of free speech.

It ain't Trump, it's you fascist fucks.

Organizations Funded by George Soros and His Open Society Foundations - Discover the Networks

You have freedom of speech, not freedom to speak at whatever platform you want, dipshit.

I speak wherever I want to & say whatever I want Dumbass--I have been on this board for many years and have over 15000 posts to prove it. If you can take the heat in this kitchen, get your crayons and coloring books out and turn on your Sean Hannity.

 

[Bob Blaylock]

Hmm lets review parts of the First.

"or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Nope nothing about permits or instituting Capital Punishment on citizens who violate the law during a protest assembly, which would also violate the 5th Amendment. Speaking of the 5th

"nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law"

Over the top, Unconstitutional.

“…the right of the people peaceably to assemble…”

Rioting is not peaceable, and therefore, not protected under the First Amendment. Of course, you left wrong-wing filth refuse to acknowledge the difference between peaceable assembly, and violent, destructive rioting. No surprise, given your unabashed alignment with criminals, against the side of law-abiding citizens.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Anyone claiming they will TAKE YOUR SHIT for PROTESTING is a straight up fucking liar.

Guess you missed this little news article from the Arizona Capital Times.........

Claiming people are being paid to riot, Republican state senators voted Wednesday to give police new power to arrest anyone who is involved in a peaceful demonstration that may turn bad — even before anything actually happened.


SB1142 expands the state’s racketeering laws, now aimed at organized crime, to also include rioting. And it redefines what constitutes rioting to include actions that result in damage to the property of others.


But the real heart of the legislation is what Democrats say is the guilt by association — and giving the government the right to criminally prosecute and seize the assets of everyone who planned a protest and everyone who participated. And what’s worse, said Sen. Steve Farley, D-Tucson, is that the person who may have broken a window, triggering the claim there was a riot, might actually not be a member of the group but someone from the other side.


Sen. Martin Quezada, D-Phoenix, acknowledged that sometimes what’s planned as a peaceful demonstration can go south.


“When people want to express themselves as a group during a time of turmoil, during a time of controversy, during a time of high emotions, that’s exactly when people gather as a community,’’ he said. “Sometimes they yell, sometimes they scream, sometimes they do go too far.’’


Quezada said, though, that everything that constitutes rioting already is a crime, ranging from assault to criminal damage, and those responsible can be individually prosecuted. He said the purpose of this bill appears to be designed to chill the First Amendment rights of people to decide to demonstrate in the first place for fear something could wrong.

http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2017/02/22/arizona-senate-crackdown-on-protests/

There are little if any facts in that article. They didn't post the actual statute. The article is almost exclusively editorialized speculation.

I'm not going to dig it up, but if you want to post the statute in its entirety, we can break it down.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Do you think this is directly aimed at your Fuhrer, Herr Soros?

Using racketeering laws against the rent a mob activities of you fascist thugs?

If there's protesters being paid someone is blowing trillions on it--LOL

This is the woman's march the day after the inauguration, if you want to see what was going on in your home state go to this link. (They were in the millions.)
Woman's march pictures

I really don't think someone is paying all these people $10 bucks an hour to protest--LOL

They're not paid they're PISSED.

BINGO

This is the closest thing America has had to a fascist dictator in charge, and people are SURPRISED that protests are so virulent?

And what a shock that they want laws to crack down on it. Fuck anyone who opposes protest.

Someone supports a centrally planned and managed economy like Hitler and Mussolini had.

It ain't Trump, it's your Fuhrer, Herr Soros.

Someone advocates for infringement of free speech.

It ain't Trump, it's you fascist fucks.

Organizations Funded by George Soros and His Open Society Foundations - Discover the Networks

You have freedom of speech, not freedom to speak at whatever platform you want, dipshit.

I speak wherever I want to & say whatever I want Dumbass--I have been on this board for many years and have over 15000 posts to prove it. If you can take the heat in this kitchen, get your crayons and coloring books out and turn on your Sean Hannity.

Post count smack? Holy shit.

 

[Vandalshandle]

Anyone claiming they will TAKE YOUR SHIT for PROTESTING is a straight up fucking liar.

Guess you missed this little news article from the Arizona Capital Times.........

Claiming people are being paid to riot, Republican state senators voted Wednesday to give police new power to arrest anyone who is involved in a peaceful demonstration that may turn bad — even before anything actually happened.


SB1142 expands the state’s racketeering laws, now aimed at organized crime, to also include rioting. And it redefines what constitutes rioting to include actions that result in damage to the property of others.


But the real heart of the legislation is what Democrats say is the guilt by association — and giving the government the right to criminally prosecute and seize the assets of everyone who planned a protest and everyone who participated. And what’s worse, said Sen. Steve Farley, D-Tucson, is that the person who may have broken a window, triggering the claim there was a riot, might actually not be a member of the group but someone from the other side.


Sen. Martin Quezada, D-Phoenix, acknowledged that sometimes what’s planned as a peaceful demonstration can go south.


“When people want to express themselves as a group during a time of turmoil, during a time of controversy, during a time of high emotions, that’s exactly when people gather as a community,’’ he said. “Sometimes they yell, sometimes they scream, sometimes they do go too far.’’


Quezada said, though, that everything that constitutes rioting already is a crime, ranging from assault to criminal damage, and those responsible can be individually prosecuted. He said the purpose of this bill appears to be designed to chill the First Amendment rights of people to decide to demonstrate in the first place for fear something could wrong.

http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2017/02/22/arizona-senate-crackdown-on-protests/

There are little if any facts in that article. They didn't post the actual statute. The article is almost exclusively editorialized speculation.

I'm not going to dig it up, but if you want to post the statute in its entirety, we can break it down.

This measure is now on it's way to committee. As such, it is not yet a statute. The democratic party is asking members to call in and ask that it be blocked before it gets to the committee, which would kill it.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Anyone claiming they will TAKE YOUR SHIT for PROTESTING is a straight up fucking liar.

Guess you missed this little news article from the Arizona Capital Times.........

Claiming people are being paid to riot, Republican state senators voted Wednesday to give police new power to arrest anyone who is involved in a peaceful demonstration that may turn bad — even before anything actually happened.


SB1142 expands the state’s racketeering laws, now aimed at organized crime, to also include rioting. And it redefines what constitutes rioting to include actions that result in damage to the property of others.


But the real heart of the legislation is what Democrats say is the guilt by association — and giving the government the right to criminally prosecute and seize the assets of everyone who planned a protest and everyone who participated. And what’s worse, said Sen. Steve Farley, D-Tucson, is that the person who may have broken a window, triggering the claim there was a riot, might actually not be a member of the group but someone from the other side.


Sen. Martin Quezada, D-Phoenix, acknowledged that sometimes what’s planned as a peaceful demonstration can go south.


“When people want to express themselves as a group during a time of turmoil, during a time of controversy, during a time of high emotions, that’s exactly when people gather as a community,’’ he said. “Sometimes they yell, sometimes they scream, sometimes they do go too far.’’


Quezada said, though, that everything that constitutes rioting already is a crime, ranging from assault to criminal damage, and those responsible can be individually prosecuted. He said the purpose of this bill appears to be designed to chill the First Amendment rights of people to decide to demonstrate in the first place for fear something could wrong.

http://azcapitoltimes.com/news/2017/02/22/arizona-senate-crackdown-on-protests/

There are little if any facts in that article. They didn't post the actual statute. The article is almost exclusively editorialized speculation.

I'm not going to dig it up, but if you want to post the statute in its entirety, we can break it down.

This measure is now on it's way to committee. As such, it is not yet a statute. The democratic party is asking members to call in and ask that it be blocked before it gets to the committee, which would kill it.

There are already laws against rioting, there shouldn't be asset seizure.

 

[BlindBoo]

Hmm lets review parts of the First.

"or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Nope nothing about permits or instituting Capital Punishment on citizens who violate the law during a protest assembly, which would also violate the 5th Amendment. Speaking of the 5th

"nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law"

Over the top, Unconstitutional.

“…the right of the people peaceably to assemble…”

Rioting is not peaceable, and therefore, not protected under the First Amendment. Of course, you left wrong-wing filth refuse to acknowledge the difference between peaceable assembly, and violent, destructive rioting. No surprise, given your unabashed alignment with criminals, against the side of law-abiding citizens.

Exactly, punish those that are guilty of violence. Even though it's painfully obvious that in your heart of hearts you Fascist want to punish everyone who disagrees with you, violent or not.

 

[Papageorgio]

Hmm lets review parts of the First.

"or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Nope nothing about permits or instituting Capital Punishment on citizens who violate the law during a protest assembly, which would also violate the 5th Amendment. Speaking of the 5th

"nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law"

Over the top, Unconstitutional.

“…the right of the people peaceably to assemble…”

Rioting is not peaceable, and therefore, not protected under the First Amendment. Of course, you left wrong-wing filth refuse to acknowledge the difference between peaceable assembly, and violent, destructive rioting. No surprise, given your unabashed alignment with criminals, against the side of law-abiding citizens.

Exactly, punish those that are guilty of violence. Even though it's painfully obvious that in your heart of hearts you Fascist want to punish everyone who disagrees with you, violent or not.

That isn't what the bill is designed to do, it is to punish those that are rioting and arrested. If caught their assets are seized. I have no issue with punishing the rioters, I have a big issue with the seizing assets. There has to be due process and if assets are Court ordered to be sold to pay off any damage a person is found guilty of causing then so be it. I love a good peaceful protest, no violence, no damaging other's property just because you are an ass.

As far as I'm your heart of heart BS, that is all it is. The left claims hate and racism to minimize and silence opposition. How many right wing groups did Obama have put on the terrorist watch groups and how vague was that list to include everyone that disagreed with him or his policies. Seems fascist to me. But it's okay if your side does it, right?

 

[NoNukes]

So don't protest violently. Duh

Are you really this stupid?

 

[BlindBoo]

Hmm lets review parts of the First.

"or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Nope nothing about permits or instituting Capital Punishment on citizens who violate the law during a protest assembly, which would also violate the 5th Amendment. Speaking of the 5th

"nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law"

Over the top, Unconstitutional.

“…the right of the people peaceably to assemble…”

Rioting is not peaceable, and therefore, not protected under the First Amendment. Of course, you left wrong-wing filth refuse to acknowledge the difference between peaceable assembly, and violent, destructive rioting. No surprise, given your unabashed alignment with criminals, against the side of law-abiding citizens.

Exactly, punish those that are guilty of violence. Even though it's painfully obvious that in your heart of hearts you Fascist want to punish everyone who disagrees with you, violent or not.

That isn't what the bill is designed to do, it is to punish those that are rioting and arrested. If caught their assets are seized. I have no issue with punishing the rioters, I have a big issue with the seizing assets. There has to be due process and if assets are Court ordered to be sold to pay off any damage a person is found guilty of causing then so be it. I love a good peaceful protest, no violence, no damaging other's property just because you are an ass.

As far as I'm your heart of heart BS, that is all it is. The left claims hate and racism to minimize and silence opposition. How many right wing groups did Obama have put on the terrorist watch groups and how vague was that list to include everyone that disagreed with him or his policies. Seems fascist to me. But it's okay if your side does it, right?

We'll have to wait and see if a bill get passed and signed and then challenged in court. I agree with you on seizing assets. What group was put on a terrorist watch list for simply disagreeing with President Obama or his policies?

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Just when you think the 4th Reich of the Republican party can't get any worse. Arizona comes up with this law. It's to oppress free speech in this country. Protesters can now be arrested and their property seized if a protest turns violent, even though they may not be involved in the violence.

"Arizona’s police officers will be able to arrest and seize the assets of any protest attendee, even before any crime or riot has taken place, under a new law voted through by state senators on Wednesday.

The legislation was originally established for racketeering but was expanded in definition to include rioting, allowing for the prosecution of everyone planned or participated in a protest that turns violent.

Democrats have criticized the bill, which allows demonstrators to be arrested and have their property seized. The legislation does not require discrimination as to who may have, for example, thrown a punch in a crowd or broken a window. As soon as a riotous action has occurred, all protesters are deemed broadly associated and therefore guilty.

Further to that, due to processes afforded authorities who investigate racketeering and the renewed definition of rioting, police are permitted to preemptively arrest those planning a protest."
New Arizona 'riot' law lets police arrest peaceful protesters—and seize their property

The 4th Reich of the Republican party is in full swing with Trump in office. Make certain they pay hell for it in 2018 and 2020.

SCROTUS's Brownshirts

No matter what the royalist Supreme Court decrees, there is no right to protest. There is only the right to peaceably assemble in an area defined by permit. What the pushy mobs are doing is felonious trespassing, aggravated by the fact that they start from an area handed over to them by the First Amendment and then aggressively abuse that right. Those who do damage in the invaded area should be shot dead. Those who non-violently join them should have their property confiscated because of their proven contempt for public and private property rights.

Hmm lets review parts of the First.

"or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Nope nothing about permits or instituting Capital Punishment on citizens who violate the law during a protest assembly, which would also violate the 5th Amendment. Speaking of the 5th

"nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law"

Over the top, Unconstitutional.

Creeps Have Made Us Crawl

"The Constitution is not a suicide pact": Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes. And the trespassing the mobs do is a deprivation of property rights. "Peaceably" doesn't cover that.

The constitution protects peaceful protesters. It does not protect non-peaceful protesters. This law appears to remove the constitutional protection of peaceful protesters and therefore imho, is unconstitutional.

Their Only Safe Space Is Out of Our Face

Insurrection is a capital offense. The enemy is outside the protection of the Constitution. We must nip this cuckoo coup in the bud. At the next riot, there will be blood. Their mob will slither back into the darkness its mind is in, and then be heard no more.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Comparison fail. He did not de-legitimize the SCOTUS. He criticized an opinion.

Get a fucking brain.

Of course he did, Jackbooted little fool. So bad was Ohwhatafuckup that Roberts mouthed "not true" to Obammys moronic lie.

Oh wow, totally on the level of trump referring to a justice as a "so-called judge"

People Who Never Grew Up Look for Father Figures

You love authority figures, if not all of them. We can attack the high and mighty lowlife according to the contempt they have for us. They are nothing special, and their contempt for the will of the people shows that we must not allow them to judge us.

 

[oreo]

Just when you think the 4th Reich of the Republican party can't get any worse. Arizona comes up with this law. It's to oppress free speech in this country. Protesters can now be arrested and their property seized if a protest turns violent, even though they may not be involved in the violence.

"Arizona’s police officers will be able to arrest and seize the assets of any protest attendee, even before any crime or riot has taken place, under a new law voted through by state senators on Wednesday.

The legislation was originally established for racketeering but was expanded in definition to include rioting, allowing for the prosecution of everyone planned or participated in a protest that turns violent.

Democrats have criticized the bill, which allows demonstrators to be arrested and have their property seized. The legislation does not require discrimination as to who may have, for example, thrown a punch in a crowd or broken a window. As soon as a riotous action has occurred, all protesters are deemed broadly associated and therefore guilty.

Further to that, due to processes afforded authorities who investigate racketeering and the renewed definition of rioting, police are permitted to preemptively arrest those planning a protest."
New Arizona 'riot' law lets police arrest peaceful protesters—and seize their property

The 4th Reich of the Republican party is in full swing with Trump in office. Make certain they pay hell for it in 2018 and 2020.

SCROTUS's Brownshirts

No matter what the royalist Supreme Court decrees, there is no right to protest. There is only the right to peaceably assemble in an area defined by permit. What the pushy mobs are doing is felonious trespassing, aggravated by the fact that they start from an area handed over to them by the First Amendment and then aggressively abuse that right. Those who do damage in the invaded area should be shot dead. Those who non-violently join them should have their property confiscated because of their proven contempt for public and private property rights.

Hmm lets review parts of the First.

"or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Nope nothing about permits or instituting Capital Punishment on citizens who violate the law during a protest assembly, which would also violate the 5th Amendment. Speaking of the 5th

"nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law"

Over the top, Unconstitutional.

Creeps Have Made Us Crawl

"The Constitution is not a suicide pact": Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes. And the trespassing the mobs do is a deprivation of property rights. "Peaceably" doesn't cover that.

The constitution protects peaceful protesters. It does not protect non-peaceful protesters. This law appears to remove the constitutional protection of peaceful protesters and therefore imho, is unconstitutional.

Their Only Safe Place Is Out of Our Face

Insurrection is a capital offense. The enemy is outside the protection of the Constitution. We must nip this cuckoo coup in the bud. At the next riot, there will be blood. Their mob will slither back into the darkness its mind is in, and then be heard no more.

When was the last riot in Arizona? The only thing I have seen recently is peaceful protests, and let me tell you you're wholly outnumbered.

You have given more than half of this country someone they can actually hate. Donald Trump.

Never in this nation's history did a President elect have to barricade himself inside the Trump tower, and his method of communication to the outside world, was reduced to a tweeter account. They will NEVER accept him as their President.

Republicans are going to pay dearly for this in 2018/2020 and beyond. You have put a target on every one of their seats. This is Salt Lake City, Utah, considered the most conservative state in the nation. Republicans are cancelling town hall meetings all across this country, and have been warned what the Welcome home party is going to be like.



No matter what you've been told by Sean Hannity on the NEWS you WANT to HEAR program, these are NOT paid protesters, it's clear they're constituents.

Here is the article that goes along with it.
Republican town halls are getting very, very nasty

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Hmm lets review parts of the First.

"or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Nope nothing about permits or instituting Capital Punishment on citizens who violate the law during a protest assembly, which would also violate the 5th Amendment. Speaking of the 5th

"nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law"

Over the top, Unconstitutional.

“…the right of the people peaceably to assemble…”

Rioting is not peaceable, and therefore, not protected under the First Amendment. Of course, you left wrong-wing filth refuse to acknowledge the difference between peaceable assembly, and violent, destructive rioting. No surprise, given your unabashed alignment with criminals, against the side of law-abiding citizens.

Exactly, punish those that are guilty of violence. Even though it's painfully obvious that in your heart of hearts you Fascist want to punish everyone who disagrees with you, violent or not.

I have a big issue with the seizing assets. There has to be due process and if assets are Court ordered to be sold to pay off any damage a person is found guilty of causing then so be it.

Preppy Progressives

That's like saying that if someone robs a bank, all he has to do is pay back the money he stole. Nothing more and no jail time. because he didn't put the bankers in jail by taking hostages. And, since it is important to identify what this movement really is, much of the money confiscated from the so-called protesters will be trust funds.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

SCROTUS's Brownshirts

No matter what the royalist Supreme Court decrees, there is no right to protest. There is only the right to peaceably assemble in an area defined by permit. What the pushy mobs are doing is felonious trespassing, aggravated by the fact that they start from an area handed over to them by the First Amendment and then aggressively abuse that right. Those who do damage in the invaded area should be shot dead. Those who non-violently join them should have their property confiscated because of their proven contempt for public and private property rights.

Hmm lets review parts of the First.

"or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Nope nothing about permits or instituting Capital Punishment on citizens who violate the law during a protest assembly, which would also violate the 5th Amendment. Speaking of the 5th

"nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law"

Over the top, Unconstitutional.

Creeps Have Made Us Crawl

"The Constitution is not a suicide pact": Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes. And the trespassing the mobs do is a deprivation of property rights. "Peaceably" doesn't cover that.

The constitution protects peaceful protesters. It does not protect non-peaceful protesters. This law appears to remove the constitutional protection of peaceful protesters and therefore imho, is unconstitutional.

Their Only Safe Place Is Out of Our Face

Insurrection is a capital offense. The enemy is outside the protection of the Constitution. We must nip this cuckoo coup in the bud. At the next riot, there will be blood. Their mob will slither back into the darkness its mind is in, and then be heard no more.

When was the last riot in Arizona? The only thing I have seen recently is peaceful protests, and let me tell you you're wholly outnumbered.

You have given more than half of this country someone they can actually hate. Donald Trump.

Never in this nation's history did a President elect have to barricade himself inside the Trump tower, and his method of communication to the outside world, was reduced to a tweeter account. They will NEVER accept him as their President.

Republicans are going to pay dearly for this in 2018/2020 and beyond. You have put a target on every one of their seats. This is Salt Lake City, Utah, considered the most conservative state in the nation. Republicans are cancelling town hall meetings all across this country, and have been warned what the Welcome home party is going to be like.



No matter what you've been told by Sean Hannity on the NEWS you WANT to HEAR program, these are NOT paid protesters, it's clear they're constituents.

Here is the article that goes along with it.
Republican town halls are getting very, very nasty

SCROTUS's Brownshirts

No matter what the royalist Supreme Court decrees, there is no right to protest. There is only the right to peaceably assemble in an area defined by permit. What the pushy mobs are doing is felonious trespassing, aggravated by the fact that they start from an area handed over to them by the First Amendment and then aggressively abuse that right. Those who do damage in the invaded area should be shot dead. Those who non-violently join them should have their property confiscated because of their proven contempt for public and private property rights.

Hmm lets review parts of the First.

"or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Nope nothing about permits or instituting Capital Punishment on citizens who violate the law during a protest assembly, which would also violate the 5th Amendment. Speaking of the 5th

"nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law"

Over the top, Unconstitutional.

Creeps Have Made Us Crawl

"The Constitution is not a suicide pact": Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes. And the trespassing the mobs do is a deprivation of property rights. "Peaceably" doesn't cover that.

The constitution protects peaceful protesters. It does not protect non-peaceful protesters. This law appears to remove the constitutional protection of peaceful protesters and therefore imho, is unconstitutional.

Their Only Safe Place Is Out of Our Face

Insurrection is a capital offense. The enemy is outside the protection of the Constitution. We must nip this cuckoo coup in the bud. At the next riot, there will be blood. Their mob will slither back into the darkness its mind is in, and then be heard no more.

When was the last riot in Arizona? The only thing I have seen recently is peaceful protests, and let me tell you you're wholly outnumbered.



Republicans are going to pay dearly for this in 2018/2020 and beyond. You have put a target on every one of their seats. This is Salt Lake City, Utah

Fake Majority

This is a new tactic by the pushy fringe. A tiny but mobile clique overloads these meetings to make it look like the average constituent is being misrepresented by his Congressman.

 

[FA_Q2]

The text of the law has been posted.

Show where it violates free speech and/or what a court will strike it down for.

FACT SHEET FOR S.B. 1142


riot; planning; participation; racketeering


Purpose



Adds rioting to the list of offenses that can be pursued under racketeering statutes. Expands the definition of riot and specifies that to prove conspiracy to commit a riot, an overt act is not required.

SB1142 - 531R - Senate Fact Sheet


Arizona bill punishes even peaceful protesters when events turn violent

If the bill becomes law, prosecutors could seize the assets of protesters, even if they didn't participate in any violence. The bill would add rioting to the list of offenses that could be charged under Arizona's Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organization laws.

The bill, according to a Senate fact sheet, stipulates that an "overt act is not required as proof of a riot offense."

No, an overt act is not required because a THREAT qualifies as well.

I posted the text already. It does NOT apply to a peaceful protester. You cannot threaten violence to others and then claim you are being peaceful.

Threats being illegal is not a new concept - it has been this way for a long time.

If this were to become law, I could peacefully attend a protest, only to find that, unknown to me, some guy had decided in advance to set fire to a billboard; and simply because of my presence, could have my property confiscated. You don't have to have a law degree to recognize that is a violation of my free speech.

No, you could not. That is what others have TOLD you. It is not in the law.

Again, the text has been posted. Where in the text is your assertion supported?

Look, FA, I really should not have teach you stuff that is just barely beyond 8th grade civics.

If you and I plan to rob a bank, and I think that your gun is unloaded, and only bluffing, and then you shoot and kill someone, I am guilty by complicity.

If you and I plan to go to a perfectly legal football game, and I have no reason to think that you are going to break the law, but while you are there, you shoot the peanut vender for shortchanging you, I am not complicitly guilty of anything. This is such a basic legal question that you would have to know this just to get ADMITTED to law school!

You might want to try reading and understanding the law before shooting your mouth off about teaching anything.

I posted the text. I Pulled out the relevant parts that you are referring to. They simply do not say what you keep demanding that they do.

To support my argument I have used the actual text. To support your argument you used asinine links to YouTube on irrelevant content. Try again.

 

[oreo]

Hmm lets review parts of the First.

"or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Nope nothing about permits or instituting Capital Punishment on citizens who violate the law during a protest assembly, which would also violate the 5th Amendment. Speaking of the 5th

"nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law"

Over the top, Unconstitutional.

Creeps Have Made Us Crawl

"The Constitution is not a suicide pact": Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes. And the trespassing the mobs do is a deprivation of property rights. "Peaceably" doesn't cover that.

The constitution protects peaceful protesters. It does not protect non-peaceful protesters. This law appears to remove the constitutional protection of peaceful protesters and therefore imho, is unconstitutional.

Their Only Safe Place Is Out of Our Face

Insurrection is a capital offense. The enemy is outside the protection of the Constitution. We must nip this cuckoo coup in the bud. At the next riot, there will be blood. Their mob will slither back into the darkness its mind is in, and then be heard no more.

When was the last riot in Arizona? The only thing I have seen recently is peaceful protests, and let me tell you you're wholly outnumbered.

You have given more than half of this country someone they can actually hate. Donald Trump.

Never in this nation's history did a President elect have to barricade himself inside the Trump tower, and his method of communication to the outside world, was reduced to a tweeter account. They will NEVER accept him as their President.

Republicans are going to pay dearly for this in 2018/2020 and beyond. You have put a target on every one of their seats. This is Salt Lake City, Utah, considered the most conservative state in the nation. Republicans are cancelling town hall meetings all across this country, and have been warned what the Welcome home party is going to be like.



No matter what you've been told by Sean Hannity on the NEWS you WANT to HEAR program, these are NOT paid protesters, it's clear they're constituents.

Here is the article that goes along with it.
Republican town halls are getting very, very nasty

Hmm lets review parts of the First.

"or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."

Nope nothing about permits or instituting Capital Punishment on citizens who violate the law during a protest assembly, which would also violate the 5th Amendment. Speaking of the 5th

"nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law"

Over the top, Unconstitutional.

Creeps Have Made Us Crawl

"The Constitution is not a suicide pact": Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes. And the trespassing the mobs do is a deprivation of property rights. "Peaceably" doesn't cover that.

The constitution protects peaceful protesters. It does not protect non-peaceful protesters. This law appears to remove the constitutional protection of peaceful protesters and therefore imho, is unconstitutional.

Their Only Safe Place Is Out of Our Face

Insurrection is a capital offense. The enemy is outside the protection of the Constitution. We must nip this cuckoo coup in the bud. At the next riot, there will be blood. Their mob will slither back into the darkness its mind is in, and then be heard no more.

When was the last riot in Arizona? The only thing I have seen recently is peaceful protests, and let me tell you you're wholly outnumbered.



Republicans are going to pay dearly for this in 2018/2020 and beyond. You have put a target on every one of their seats. This is Salt Lake City, Utah

Fake Majority

This is a new tactic by the pushy fringe. A tiny but mobile clique overloads these meetings to make it look like the average constituent is being misrepresented by his Congressman.

You can deny it all you want to but Republicans are cancelling town halls across this country. They have seen this video and have been warned about their Welcome Home parties.
More Republicans Face Contentious Town Hall Meetings
GOP lawmakers canceling public events amid town hall chaos

And there is no denying these protests.

Woman's the day after Trump's inauguration. To see what your home state was doing go to this link. They were in the millions.
Woman's march pictures

And it's not going to get any better with this Russian connection all over the news. These are no longer just protesters, they're activists against the Republican party.

You have awoken a sleeping giant and it's pissed. They aren't going to stop.