&
☭proletarian☭
Guest
I'm too lazy to fix the typos right now. >.>
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
That does sound like me....hahaha
☭proletarian☭;2161108 said:Conservatives want to continue polluting too. They know it is wrong, but doing right would cost them more money, and they don't want that.
Bourgeois Liberals also opposed anti-pollution laws as abridging freedom, claiming that people would vote with their wallets for non-polluting companies is pollution was a concern for the masses. It was Leftists, especially environmental leftists and those who believe their is a moral obligation to one's fellow humans, present, and future, who pushed for enviromental protection.
'Conservative' is not an ideology. Those who called themselves 'conservatives' in those debates were arguing the liberal case.
Because they benefit from the flaws!!!
Bourgeois liberalism is based on the 'right to exploit'
I agree. It was the left that faught for and won environmental protections.
Well, that explains why the FF always met in taverns....Yeah... attempting intelligent, unemotive discourse with a lib is like attempting the same with your retarded nephew.... when he's drunk.
when did the left claim nixon?
i must have slept through it
Arguing with liberals is a really tough proposition. Ive engaged in many a debate with a large cross section of mainstream liberals. They'll quickly run out of facts and precedent, and it almost always ends with them calling me cruel, heartless, racist, fascist, or whatever other label they want to slap on me. None of them want to even hear a conservative viewpoint, nor do they really want to debate or learn anything different from their own viewpoint.
gotta link, lance.
Asshole Files
☭proletarian☭;2161165 said:So your general theme is that us liberals aren't really liberals?
My point is that many people call themselves liberals whore are not liberals. Oftentimes, they do it out of ignorance of terms.
Not if you're a liberal, you don't. Liberalism opposes minimum wages, arguing that fair wages will be achieved because noone will work if there's not fair pay involved and that competition for jobs acts to push wages down and competition for employees pushes them up, eventually leading to a balance. They hold that the same forced guide the cost of goods and also that of labour.So you are suggesting that we don't really care about the environment or workers wages?
History proves the liberal assertions false, which is why many who sit to the liberals' left, including many socialist systems (social democracy and democratic socialism, for instance, have advocated minimum wages. A similar battle has been fought over workplace safety laws (OSHA, housings for formerly covered gears, etc). Recall that modern Leftist thought emerged out of the exploitation of the proletariat made possible by the Industrial Revolution and justified using Liberal ideology (note that he advocates of Bourgeois Liberalism were the Bourgeoisie and landed gentry who emerged as the new ruling class following the end of the Monarchies and Aristocracies in Europe and the liberation of America from the Crown.
Which side, exactly, do you think I am on?
Clarify. Do I want people around the world to have access to the means to improve their condition? Yes. Do I support sweat shops as a means of avoiding compliance with laws designed to protect the worker? No. What, exactly, do you intend to ask?
It seems you weren't paying attention.
They're not the only ones, but they do tend to be hypocrites. What's your point?It is the righties who are hypocrites.
You call yourselves christians but don't do what Jesus said for them.
Actually, I'm an atheist. What ever made you think I was a xtian?
☭proletarian☭;2161316 said:when did the left claim nixon?
i must have slept through it
By seeking to use the State to enforce environmental laws, he was growing the role and power of the State, restricting the liberties of persons and companies, and spitting in the face of liberal ideology and the 'solutions' ('voting with their wallets') emergent from liberal thought. He was following a line of thinking characteristic of Leftist thought in using the State to protect the People form themselves instead of trusting the People to use their power as consumers to force companies to behave in a way the People wished.
Regardless of his positions on other issues, in the matter in question he acted in accordance with liberal ideology but with an ideology that clearly views the State as having a duty to protect the people from themselves, does not trust the People to govern their own actions, and views a moral obligation to others and/or the planet as outweighing the liberty of individuals and businessmen.
The political pressure at its base level which led him and other politicians to act in such a manner is characteristic of and has almost always come from the Left.
The Endangered Species Act is a prime example of placing a moral obligation to the planet and to nature above the liberties of people and the businesses they operate.
Since when do peon pansy asses get to determine salary ceilings for others?
Arguing with liberals is a really tough proposition. Ive engaged in many a debate with a large cross section of mainstream liberals. They'll quickly run out of facts and precedent, and it almost always ends with them calling me cruel, heartless, racist, fascist, or whatever other label they want to slap on me. None of them want to even hear a conservative viewpoint, nor do they really want to debate or learn anything different from their own viewpoint.
gotta link, lance.
Asshole Files
Well as a Liberal I can tell you that you are wrong about us and what we have accomplished. And what we stand for.
It would be like if I asked an American what communism was like, they would have a much different answer than a Russian who actually lived thru it.
Since when do peon pansy asses get to determine salary ceilings for others?
Since the New Deal. Read history. Since Unions too. Since the USA was founded for We The People. Corporate slave.
Lol. You remain an idiot. I work for the STATE.
I have a friend like you. The idea that the consumers with their purchasing power can regulate industry. The free marketeers. The Ron Paul's. You guys are better than the right but not much. People would really starve under your approach. Darwinism. Only the strong survive. Will never catch on.
Our government is for us, we the people.
No. I am not a liberal. I am a Leftist. I happen to support mandatory transparency, the public release of financial records, minimum wages, clean and safe working environments, environmental standards food stamps for those who show an honest effort to gain employment and improve their condition, competition in the market...You want to change America into some corporate facist state under the guise of free market capitalism?