Anachronism
Rookie
- Banned
- #21
Yeah....everyone's well-aware o'.....
....Teabaggers' black and white principles, and ideals.
And with that, there's obviously no point in having any more conversation between us. Welcome to the Ignore List.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yeah....everyone's well-aware o'.....
....Teabaggers' black and white principles, and ideals.
George this is what a coallition looks like!
George this is what a coallition looks like!
You lot could turn a post about Medieval Badger poo into a partisan argument
George this is what a coallition looks like!
Shame they couldn't get this done early enough to take advantage of the rebels holding half the country. Well I guess they wanted to see how many rebels and civilians would die pushing them out of every major city first.
Might work out, but a little slow on the trigger pull, unfortunately.
PS-Do we still have to pay for most of this coallition or will the lead countries be picking up the tab?
George this is what a coallition looks like!
Shame they couldn't get this done early enough to take advantage of the rebels holding half the country. Well I guess they wanted to see how many rebels and civilians would die pushing them out of every major city first.
Might work out, but a little slow on the trigger pull, unfortunately.
PS-Do we still have to pay for most of this coallition or will the lead countries be picking up the tab?
Arab League is picking up a substantial chunk of the bill. What does that tell you?
wow, the PEACEFUL liberals who protested Bush's war are now cheering WARMONGERS.
hypocrites
George this is what a coallition looks like!
Shame they couldn't get this done early enough to take advantage of the rebels holding half the country. Well I guess they wanted to see how many rebels and civilians would die pushing them out of every major city first.
Might work out, but a little slow on the trigger pull, unfortunately.
PS-Do we still have to pay for most of this coallition or will the lead countries be picking up the tab?
Arab League is picking up a substantial chunk of the bill. What does that tell you?
wow, the PEACEFUL liberals who protested Bush's war are now cheering WARMONGERS.
hypocrites
Well, some of them are just that; then again, some of them are tying themselves in knots, explaining why this isn't as bad as "Bush's war" in Iraq, and still others won't even support "their" president, the one they said could do no wrong! It would be amusing if it weren't so pathetic!
Look at this, as a shining example of how not to behave as Americans. When a president, any president, sends our armed forces into action, we ought to support him...and them. Politics stops where the ocean begins, or at least that's the way it should be. I don't care for Obama's politics, I didn't vote for him, and I don't care for his administration; but right now he is the only Commander-in -Chief we have, he has taken action on behalf of the nation, and we ought to support that action, and hope it succeeds. If we did otherwise, we would be no better than those on the left. We criticized them enough (justifiably) for wanting America to fail, for the sake of their political ends. If it was wrong for them to do that, it would be equally wrong for us to do the same.
No link, no quote.....George this is what a coallition looks like!
wow, the PEACEFUL liberals who protested Bush's war are now cheering WARMONGERS.
hypocrites
Well, some of them are just that; then again, some of them are tying themselves in knots, explaining why this isn't as bad as "Bush's war" in Iraq, and still others won't even support "their" president, the one they said could do no wrong! It would be amusing if it weren't so pathetic!
Look at this, as a shining example of how not to behave as Americans. When a president, any president, sends our armed forces into action, we ought to support him...and them. Politics stops where the ocean begins, or at least that's the way it should be. I don't care for Obama's politics, I didn't vote for him, and I don't care for his administration; but right now he is the only Commander-in -Chief we have, he has taken action on behalf of the nation, and we ought to support that action, and hope it succeeds. If we did otherwise, we would be no better than those on the left. We criticized them enough (justifiably) for wanting America to fail, for the sake of their political ends. If it was wrong for them to do that, it would be equally wrong for us to do the same.
We should support the president even if he is wrong? Should we support him if he decides to attack France because he hates escargot?
Well, some of them are just that; then again, some of them are tying themselves in knots, explaining why this isn't as bad as "Bush's war" in Iraq, and still others won't even support "their" president, the one they said could do no wrong! It would be amusing if it weren't so pathetic!
Look at this, as a shining example of how not to behave as Americans. When a president, any president, sends our armed forces into action, we ought to support him...and them. Politics stops where the ocean begins, or at least that's the way it should be. I don't care for Obama's politics, I didn't vote for him, and I don't care for his administration; but right now he is the only Commander-in -Chief we have, he has taken action on behalf of the nation, and we ought to support that action, and hope it succeeds. If we did otherwise, we would be no better than those on the left. We criticized them enough (justifiably) for wanting America to fail, for the sake of their political ends. If it was wrong for them to do that, it would be equally wrong for us to do the same.
We should support the president even if he is wrong? Should we support him if he decides to attack France because he hates escargot?
If I remember correctly after 9/11, liberals were told they were un-american for not supporting the war efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan even if there were no WMD's or even if Iraq had nothing at all to do with 9/11.
So, if it was good when it happened under Bush, it ought to be good today, right?
Immie
We should support the president even if he is wrong? Should we support him if he decides to attack France because he hates escargot?
If I remember correctly after 9/11, liberals were told they were un-american for not supporting the war efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan even if there were no WMD's or even if Iraq had nothing at all to do with 9/11.
So, if it was good when it happened under Bush, it ought to be good today, right?
Immie
You would have a point there, if I had said something like that. I didn't, even though I did think he was justified in invading Afghanistan. That does not mean he deserved unconditional support, and I did not give it too him.
You lot could turn a post about Medieval Badger poo into a partisan argument
I dont give a hoot about Obama the guys a Hologram. the world isn't black and white.
hummm? I'm curious. How many countries did Bush have with him to go into IRAQ?
Do you have a link?If I remember correctly after 9/11, liberals were told they were un-american for not supporting the war efforts in Iraq and Afghanistan even if there were no WMD's or even if Iraq had nothing at all to do with 9/11.
So, if it was good when it happened under Bush, it ought to be good today, right?
Immie
You would have a point there, if I had said something like that. I didn't, even though I did think he was justified in invading Afghanistan. That does not mean he deserved unconditional support, and I did not give it too him.
But, I was not speaking of you having said that. I simply meant that liberals were told by an awful lot of conservatives that they were un-American for not supporting George's wars.
Immie
Our goals here are ousting Ghaddafi and putting in.....well, who? Who are we supporting? Who will be the ruler in Libya if we succeed? How is that going to help US interests?