Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Alan Dershowitz, a recognized expert on the constitution, Harvard professor, Democrat and a Clinton supporter states there is not enough to impeach.
So the people on this board regardless of party, who are for impeachment, explain how you’re more of an expert than he is on this topic.
Thank you.
So if I produce a Harvard or Yale lawyer that says differently, what does that do to your OP?
For example...
Donald Trump's "Civil War" quote tweet is actually grounds for impeachment, says Harvard Law profressor
Alan Dershowitz, a recognized expert on the constitution, Harvard professor, Democrat and a Clinton supporter states there is not enough to impeach.
So the people on this board regardless of party, who are for impeachment, explain how you’re more of an expert than he is on this topic.
Thank you.
So if I produce a Harvard or Yale lawyer that says differently, what does that do to your OP?
For example...
Donald Trump's "Civil War" quote tweet is actually grounds for impeachment, says Harvard Law profressor
Alan Dershowitz, a recognized expert on the constitution, Harvard professor, Democrat and a Clinton supporter states there is not enough to impeach.
So the people on this board regardless of party, who are for impeachment, explain how you’re more of an expert than he is on this topic.
Thank you.
Alan Dershowitz, a recognized expert on the constitution, Harvard professor, Democrat and a Clinton supporter states there is not enough to impeach.
So the people on this board regardless of party, who are for impeachment, explain how you’re more of an expert than he is on this topic.
Thank you.
Alan Dershowitz is 81 years old and senile. At this stage, anyone is more of a constitutional expert than Dershowitz.
Alan Dershowitz, a recognized expert on the constitution, Harvard professor, Democrat and a Clinton supporter states there is not enough to impeach.
So the people on this board regardless of party, who are for impeachment, explain how you’re more of an expert than he is on this topic.
Thank you.
So if I produce a Harvard or Yale lawyer that says differently, what does that do to your OP?
For example...
Donald Trump's "Civil War" quote tweet is actually grounds for impeachment, says Harvard Law profressor
Alan Dershowitz, a recognized expert on the constitution, Harvard professor, Democrat and a Clinton supporter states there is not enough to impeach.
So the people on this board regardless of party, who are for impeachment, explain how you’re more of an expert than he is on this topic.
Thank you.
He wasn't a Clinton supporter.. He just thought Trump was a scum bag...
I respect his opinion... But this is not a legal matter but a political process... You could not break the law and get impeached, you loose your job...
Example: A secret security agent has an affair with Melina Trump. He has not broke the law but do you think he is keeping his job?
What exactly is concocted?The Democrats have nothing beyond media to help them concoct their stories.
Alan Dershowitz, a recognized expert on the constitution, Harvard professor, Democrat and a Clinton supporter states there is not enough to impeach.
So the people on this board regardless of party, who are for impeachment, explain how you’re more of an expert than he is on this topic.
Thank you.
So if I produce a Harvard or Yale lawyer that says differently, what does that do to your OP?
For example...
Donald Trump's "Civil War" quote tweet is actually grounds for impeachment, says Harvard Law profressor
Is that professor a Republican and a Trump supporter? Dershowitz is a Democrat and Clinton supporter. Plus Dershowitz is renowned. It would be like me saying, Michael Jordan believes you need to follow a certain regimen of diet and skills training to be a great hoops player. And you respond with, what if I quote Harrison Barnes and he disagrees. Barnes is an NBA player too and played for UNC. Most would agree that Jordan's opinion carries more weight. Stop being obtuse.
Yea...
And OJ didn’t do it
Alan Dershowitz, a recognized expert on the constitution, Harvard professor, Democrat and a Clinton supporter states there is not enough to impeach.
So the people on this board regardless of party, who are for impeachment, explain how you’re more of an expert than he is on this topic.
Thank you.
So if I produce a Harvard or Yale lawyer that says differently, what does that do to your OP?
For example...
Donald Trump's "Civil War" quote tweet is actually grounds for impeachment, says Harvard Law profressor
Is that professor a Republican and a Trump supporter? Dershowitz is a Democrat and Clinton supporter. Plus Dershowitz is renowned. It would be like me saying, Michael Jordan believes you need to follow a certain regimen of diet and skills training to be a great hoops player. And you respond with, what if I quote Harrison Barnes and he disagrees. Barnes is an NBA player too and played for UNC. Most would agree that Jordan's opinion carries more weight. Stop being obtuse.
He was renowned until OJ
Then he lost his credibility
The democrats and the MSM always abide by that old country lawyer trope, "say something 3x and someone believes it". So the propaganda arm of the democrat party, aka the MSM keeps blaring the false charges against Trump hoping that someone else would believe it. Then their fake pollsters put up more disinformation.
Dershowitz would be on my list of witnesses for the Trump defense, calling the impeachment articles bullshit.
No GOP senator would dare vote to remove Trump, or they are gone in the next primary.
The charges are NOT false, and Trump has already admitted he did this. His claim is that there was nothing wrong in his request.
But keep repeating the Troll Farm talking points. We've noted that the Kremlin and the White House are both working off the same set of talking points in their media on the impeachment. Amazing how that happens so often. Putin says something and then Trump repeats it.
What exactly is concocted?The Democrats have nothing beyond media to help them concoct their stories.
They are using Trumps own words
Dershowitz delivered for those who pay himYea...
And OJ didn’t do it
You made my point you dumb Leftist. OJ did do it and Dershowitz and the team were great attorneys and made sure the jury found him not guilty.
Text of Article 2, Section 4:
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
The 'Travis Translation' of Article 2, Section 4:
The President, the Vice President, and other officers of the United States, can be kicked out of office (impeached) if they are found guilty of double-crossing (betraying) the country, offering people money or getting money to do something dishonest, or other really big crimes.
Article II Section 4 - Impeachment
Dershowitz delivered for those who pay himYea...
And OJ didn’t do it
You made my point you dumb Leftist. OJ did do it and Dershowitz and the team were great attorneys and made sure the jury found him not guilty.
Now, conservatives pay him
Text of Article 2, Section 4:
The President, Vice President and all civil Officers of the United States, shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.
The 'Travis Translation' of Article 2, Section 4:
The President, the Vice President, and other officers of the United States, can be kicked out of office (impeached) if they are found guilty of double-crossing (betraying) the country, offering people money or getting money to do something dishonest, or other really big crimes.
Article II Section 4 - Impeachment