Are American conservatives' ignorance & stubbornness a threat to all life on Earth!

Are American conservatives' ignorance & stubbornness a threat to all life on Earth!


  • Total voters
    12
A few years ago, I recall being in a debate on a forum around Earth Day. Conservatives were, as usual, angry, defiant, and completely unwilling to listen to rational arguments about just about any subject. Global warming/Climate change was, of course, one of those topics. In fact, many conservatives hated the concept and the idea of Earth Day so much that they claimed they purposely turned on all the lights in their homes or simply ran the engines in their vehicles while they sat in their cars listening to their radios as some kind of protest. Frankly, it seemed silly and just plain childish to me. It still does. It reminded me of times when I've seen some child (and sometimes an adult) act in a destructive manner as a form of protest against something. As an example, a person might smash something of value in an effort to make a point, although the point they ultimately make is that they're both irrational and immature.

However, it's one thing to take a hammer to your own car in a fit of pique. It's another thing entirely to destroy your home where others in your family also live. But, I guess you can always move somewhere else, right? Well, not in the case of planet Earth. Earth is everyone's home, and if we (the collective we) destroy the sustainability of life on this planet, we've got nowhere else to go. And right now, the only people in the world who seem to be against trying to rise to meet the immense and growing challenge of climate change are American Conservatives.
There's no such thing as man-made global warming… jack weed

Only humans are extracting liquid, gaseous, and solid carbon from underground where it's been sequestered for millions of years in order to burn it for energy thereby placing it into the atmosphere where it acts as a catalyst for warming the Earth. You see, the greenhouse effect is not a complicated theory like quantum mechanics; it's Earth Science 101.
 
Plants require CO2 to live. Every nation on Earth is working to kill off all plant life? The vegans are gonna be pissed!
That you do not understand what I said is an indicator of your ignorance on the subject.
 
A few years ago, I recall being in a debate on a forum around Earth Day. Conservatives were, as usual, angry, defiant, and completely unwilling to listen to rational arguments about just about any subject. Global warming/Climate change was, of course, one of those topics. In fact, many conservatives hated the concept and the idea of Earth Day so much that they claimed they purposely turned on all the lights in their homes or simply ran the engines in their vehicles while they sat in their cars listening to their radios as some kind of protest. Frankly, it seemed silly and just plain childish to me. It still does. It reminded me of times when I've seen some child (and sometimes an adult) act in a destructive manner as a form of protest against something. As an example, a person might smash something of value in an effort to make a point, although the point they ultimately make is that they're both irrational and immature.

However, it's one thing to take a hammer to your own car in a fit of pique. It's another thing entirely to destroy your home where others in your family also live. But, I guess you can always move somewhere else, right? Well, not in the case of planet Earth. Earth is everyone's home, and if we (the collective we) destroy the sustainability of life on this planet, we've got nowhere else to go. And right now, the only people in the world who seem to be against trying to rise to meet the immense and growing challenge of climate change are American Conservatives.
There's no such thing as man-made global warming… jack weed

Only humans are extracting liquid, gaseous, and solid carbon from underground where it's been sequestered for millions of years in order to burn it for energy thereby placing it into the atmosphere where it acts as a catalyst for warming the Earth. You see, the greenhouse effect is not a complicated theory like quantum mechanics; it's Earth Science 101.

Apparently you've never heard of volcanoes or noticed that all animals exhale CO2 or noticed that CO2 is natural and necessary for life on Earth. You are just in denial about your cult foolishness. Far more theories turn out to be bullshit than proven fact.
 
A few years ago, I recall being in a debate on a forum around Earth Day. Conservatives were, as usual, angry, defiant, and completely unwilling to listen to rational arguments about just about any subject. Global warming/Climate change was, of course, one of those topics. In fact, many conservatives hated the concept and the idea of Earth Day so much that they claimed they purposely turned on all the lights in their homes or simply ran the engines in their vehicles while they sat in their cars listening to their radios as some kind of protest. Frankly, it seemed silly and just plain childish to me. It still does. It reminded me of times when I've seen some child (and sometimes an adult) act in a destructive manner as a form of protest against something. As an example, a person might smash something of value in an effort to make a point, although the point they ultimately make is that they're both irrational and immature.

However, it's one thing to take a hammer to your own car in a fit of pique. It's another thing entirely to destroy your home where others in your family also live. But, I guess you can always move somewhere else, right? Well, not in the case of planet Earth. Earth is everyone's home, and if we (the collective we) destroy the sustainability of life on this planet, we've got nowhere else to go. And right now, the only people in the world who seem to be against trying to rise to meet the immense and growing challenge of climate change are American Conservatives.
There's no such thing as man-made global warming… jack weed

Only humans are extracting liquid, gaseous, and solid carbon from underground where it's been sequestered for millions of years in order to burn it for energy thereby placing it into the atmosphere where it acts as a catalyst for warming the Earth. You see, the greenhouse effect is not a complicated theory like quantum mechanics; it's Earth Science 101.

Apparently you've never heard of volcanoes or noticed that all animals exhale CO2 or noticed that CO2 is natural and necessary for life on Earth. You are just in denial about your cult foolishness. Far more theories turn out to be bullshit than proven fact.
Man-made global warming is 100% myth
 
The cons will not destroy the earths atmosphere as every nation on earth is working to stop the C02 and other forms of environmental damaging products.

Maybe you can provide a single piece of observed, measured, quantified evidence that supports your belief that CO2 will destroy the atmosphere...and maybe tell us why it didn't when the atmospheric CO2 levels were more than 100 times the present concentration?
 
Only humans are extracting liquid, gaseous, and solid carbon from underground where it's been sequestered for millions of years in order to burn it for energy thereby placing it into the atmosphere where it acts as a catalyst for warming the Earth. You see, the greenhouse effect is not a complicated theory like quantum mechanics; it's Earth Science 101.

You say that the product of combustion is causing the earth to warm like you really believe it...so I will give you the benefit of the doubt and accept that you believe it. Now, can you provide a single observed, measured, quantified piece of evidence that supports that claim? For that matter, can you provide any actual evidence of a greenhouse effect as described by climate science. You say that it is science 101 so the observed, measured, quantified evidence must be abundant...lets see a single piece of it.
 
Any group that thinks scam artist Trump is amazing and murderer Putin a hero are dangerous to the planet.
 
A few years ago, I recall being in a debate on a forum around Earth Day. Conservatives were, as usual, angry, defiant, and completely unwilling to listen to rational arguments about just about any subject. Global warming/Climate change was, of course, one of those topics. In fact, many conservatives hated the concept and the idea of Earth Day so much that they claimed they purposely turned on all the lights in their homes or simply ran the engines in their vehicles while they sat in their cars listening to their radios as some kind of protest. Frankly, it seemed silly and just plain childish to me. It still does. It reminded me of times when I've seen some child (and sometimes an adult) act in a destructive manner as a form of protest against something. As an example, a person might smash something of value in an effort to make a point, although the point they ultimately make is that they're both irrational and immature.

However, it's one thing to take a hammer to your own car in a fit of pique. It's another thing entirely to destroy your home where others in your family also live. But, I guess you can always move somewhere else, right? Well, not in the case of planet Earth. Earth is everyone's home, and if we (the collective we) destroy the sustainability of life on this planet, we've got nowhere else to go. And right now, the only people in the world who seem to be against trying to rise to meet the immense and growing challenge of climate change are American Conservatives.
There's no such thing as man-made global warming… jack weed

Only humans are extracting liquid, gaseous, and solid carbon from underground where it's been sequestered for millions of years in order to burn it for energy thereby placing it into the atmosphere where it acts as a catalyst for warming the Earth. You see, the greenhouse effect is not a complicated theory like quantum mechanics; it's Earth Science 101.

Apparently you've never heard of volcanoes or noticed that all animals exhale CO2 or noticed that CO2 is natural and necessary for life on Earth. You are just in denial about your cult foolishness. Far more theories turn out to be bullshit than proven fact.


I bet he thinks that we are a major source of CO2 on this planet as well and is completely unaware that we don't produce enough CO2 to even overcome the natural variation in the earth's own CO2 making machinery from year to year.
 
Any group that thinks scam artist Trump is amazing and murderer Putin a hero are dangerous to the planet.

More dangerous than a group that follows a political philosophy that has resulted literally hundreds of millions of deaths? Look at history and learn about the bloodbath that socialism has visited on earth.
 
The cons will not destroy the earths atmosphere as every nation on earth is working to stop the C02 and other forms of environmental damaging products.

Maybe you can provide a single piece of observed, measured, quantified evidence that supports your belief that CO2 will destroy the atmosphere...and maybe tell us why it didn't when the atmospheric CO2 levels were more than 100 times the present concentration?
We Just Breached the 410 PPM Threshold for CO2 This may help your mind.
 
Any group that thinks scam artist Trump is amazing and murderer Putin a hero are dangerous to the planet.

More dangerous than a group that follows a political philosophy that has resulted literally hundreds of millions of deaths? Look at history and learn about the bloodbath that socialism has visited on earth.
I suggest you look at religion and all the millions they have killed.
 
Only humans are extracting liquid, gaseous, and solid carbon from underground where it's been sequestered for millions of years in order to burn it for energy thereby placing it into the atmosphere where it acts as a catalyst for warming the Earth. You see, the greenhouse effect is not a complicated theory like quantum mechanics; it's Earth Science 101.

You say that the product of combustion is causing the earth to warm like you really believe it...so I will give you the benefit of the doubt and accept that you believe it. Now, can you provide a single observed, measured, quantified piece of evidence that supports that claim? For that matter, can you provide any actual evidence of a greenhouse effect as described by climate science. You say that it is science 101 so the observed, measured, quantified evidence must be abundant...lets see a single piece of it.
Same Shit Different Day mindless nescient non thinking.
 
A few years ago, I recall being in a debate on a forum around Earth Day. Conservatives were, as usual, angry, defiant, and completely unwilling to listen to rational arguments about just about any subject. Global warming/Climate change was, of course, one of those topics. In fact, many conservatives hated the concept and the idea of Earth Day so much that they claimed they purposely turned on all the lights in their homes or simply ran the engines in their vehicles while they sat in their cars listening to their radios as some kind of protest. Frankly, it seemed silly and just plain childish to me. It still does. It reminded me of times when I've seen some child (and sometimes an adult) act in a destructive manner as a form of protest against something. As an example, a person might smash something of value in an effort to make a point, although the point they ultimately make is that they're both irrational and immature.

However, it's one thing to take a hammer to your own car in a fit of pique. It's another thing entirely to destroy your home where others in your family also live. But, I guess you can always move somewhere else, right? Well, not in the case of planet Earth. Earth is everyone's home, and if we (the collective we) destroy the sustainability of life on this planet, we've got nowhere else to go. And right now, the only people in the world who seem to be against trying to rise to meet the immense and growing challenge of climate change are American Conservatives.

Notice how the AGW cult and the far left religious cult are one in the same. They believe in computer models that they create and program.

CMIP5-90-models-global-Tsfc-vs-obs-thru-2013.png
 
The cons will not destroy the earths atmosphere as every nation on earth is working to stop the C02 and other forms of environmental damaging products.

Maybe you can provide a single piece of observed, measured, quantified evidence that supports your belief that CO2 will destroy the atmosphere...and maybe tell us why it didn't when the atmospheric CO2 levels were more than 100 times the present concentration?
We Just Breached the 410 PPM Threshold for CO2 This may help your mind.

And? I am not sure what you think that means. We know that when the ice age that the earth is presently crawling out of began, the atmospheric CO2 levels were around 1000ppm. When ice ages begin with CO2 levels at or above 1000ppm, what exactly about 400ppm has you all in a dither?

Can you provide any observed, measured, quantified evidence that demonstrates that CO2 levels of 400 or even 800 or 1000ppm can cause any discernible change in climate?
 
Any group that thinks scam artist Trump is amazing and murderer Putin a hero are dangerous to the planet.

More dangerous than a group that follows a political philosophy that has resulted literally hundreds of millions of deaths? Look at history and learn about the bloodbath that socialism has visited on earth.
I suggest you look at religion and all the millions they have killed.

I have...clearly you haven't.

Sorry guy, socialism has killed more than religion and war combined. Since it began, an estimated 15 million people have been killed by or because of Christianity....and WWII was by far the most devastating war humanity has ever seen with abut 60 million deaths. Deaths due to other religions and other wars combined won't equal those numbers. The death toll of socialism crossed 100 million in the 1970's.
 
Only humans are extracting liquid, gaseous, and solid carbon from underground where it's been sequestered for millions of years in order to burn it for energy thereby placing it into the atmosphere where it acts as a catalyst for warming the Earth. You see, the greenhouse effect is not a complicated theory like quantum mechanics; it's Earth Science 101.

You say that the product of combustion is causing the earth to warm like you really believe it...so I will give you the benefit of the doubt and accept that you believe it. Now, can you provide a single observed, measured, quantified piece of evidence that supports that claim? For that matter, can you provide any actual evidence of a greenhouse effect as described by climate science. You say that it is science 101 so the observed, measured, quantified evidence must be abundant...lets see a single piece of it.
Same Shit Different Day mindless nescient non thinking.


i asked for a single shred of observed, measured, quantified evidence that supports the AGW hypothesis over natural variability...I can't help but notice that you didn't provide one...not to worry, there is none...which is why I confidently asked you for a piece of such evidence. I never expected you to deliver...I ask because I am interested in seeing the bullshit reasons you warmers invariably give for not producing...
 
Only humans are extracting liquid, gaseous, and solid carbon from underground where it's been sequestered for millions of years in order to burn it for energy thereby placing it into the atmosphere where it acts as a catalyst for warming the Earth. You see, the greenhouse effect is not a complicated theory like quantum mechanics; it's Earth Science 101.

You say that the product of combustion is causing the earth to warm like you really believe it...so I will give you the benefit of the doubt and accept that you believe it. Now, can you provide a single observed, measured, quantified piece of evidence that supports that claim? For that matter, can you provide any actual evidence of a greenhouse effect as described by climate science. You say that it is science 101 so the observed, measured, quantified evidence must be abundant...lets see a single piece of it.

Build a greenhouse. You'll see for yourself. Or just sit in a car with the engine off for a while on a morning with a good cloud cover. You'll notice that exhaling CO2 will cause the temperature to rise above what it was when you got in.
 
A few years ago, I recall being in a debate on a forum around Earth Day. Conservatives were, as usual, angry, defiant, and completely unwilling to listen to rational arguments about just about any subject. Global warming/Climate change was, of course, one of those topics. In fact, many conservatives hated the concept and the idea of Earth Day so much that they claimed they purposely turned on all the lights in their homes or simply ran the engines in their vehicles while they sat in their cars listening to their radios as some kind of protest. Frankly, it seemed silly and just plain childish to me. It still does. It reminded me of times when I've seen some child (and sometimes an adult) act in a destructive manner as a form of protest against something. As an example, a person might smash something of value in an effort to make a point, although the point they ultimately make is that they're both irrational and immature.

However, it's one thing to take a hammer to your own car in a fit of pique. It's another thing entirely to destroy your home where others in your family also live. But, I guess you can always move somewhere else, right? Well, not in the case of planet Earth. Earth is everyone's home, and if we (the collective we) destroy the sustainability of life on this planet, we've got nowhere else to go. And right now, the only people in the world who seem to be against trying to rise to meet the immense and growing challenge of climate change are American Conservatives.
There's no such thing as man-made global warming… jack weed

Only humans are extracting liquid, gaseous, and solid carbon from underground where it's been sequestered for millions of years in order to burn it for energy thereby placing it into the atmosphere where it acts as a catalyst for warming the Earth. You see, the greenhouse effect is not a complicated theory like quantum mechanics; it's Earth Science 101.

Apparently you've never heard of volcanoes or noticed that all animals exhale CO2 or noticed that CO2 is natural and necessary for life on Earth. You are just in denial about your cult foolishness. Far more theories turn out to be bullshit than proven fact.


I bet he thinks that we are a major source of CO2 on this planet as well and is completely unaware that we don't produce enough CO2 to even overcome the natural variation in the earth's own CO2 making machinery from year to year.

Well, the human population on Earth is estimated to have passed the 1 billion mark for the first time around 1800. It took ALL of human history to reach that mark. It took only 127 years (to around 1927) to reach 2 billion. It took only 33 years (to 1960) to reach 3 billion. And only 51 years later (6 years ago in 2011), the world's population reached 7 billion.

Population growth - Wikipedia
 
A few years ago, I recall being in a debate on a forum around Earth Day. Conservatives were, as usual, angry, defiant, and completely unwilling to listen to rational arguments about just about any subject. Global warming/Climate change was, of course, one of those topics. In fact, many conservatives hated the concept and the idea of Earth Day so much that they claimed they purposely turned on all the lights in their homes or simply ran the engines in their vehicles while they sat in their cars listening to their radios as some kind of protest. Frankly, it seemed silly and just plain childish to me. It still does. It reminded me of times when I've seen some child (and sometimes an adult) act in a destructive manner as a form of protest against something. As an example, a person might smash something of value in an effort to make a point, although the point they ultimately make is that they're both irrational and immature.

However, it's one thing to take a hammer to your own car in a fit of pique. It's another thing entirely to destroy your home where others in your family also live. But, I guess you can always move somewhere else, right? Well, not in the case of planet Earth. Earth is everyone's home, and if we (the collective we) destroy the sustainability of life on this planet, we've got nowhere else to go. And right now, the only people in the world who seem to be against trying to rise to meet the immense and growing challenge of climate change are American Conservatives.
There's no such thing as man-made global warming… jack weed

Only humans are extracting liquid, gaseous, and solid carbon from underground where it's been sequestered for millions of years in order to burn it for energy thereby placing it into the atmosphere where it acts as a catalyst for warming the Earth. You see, the greenhouse effect is not a complicated theory like quantum mechanics; it's Earth Science 101.

Apparently you've never heard of volcanoes or noticed that all animals exhale CO2 or noticed that CO2 is natural and necessary for life on Earth. You are just in denial about your cult foolishness. Far more theories turn out to be bullshit than proven fact.


I bet he thinks that we are a major source of CO2 on this planet as well and is completely unaware that we don't produce enough CO2 to even overcome the natural variation in the earth's own CO2 making machinery from year to year.

Well, the human population on Earth is estimated to have passed the 1 billion mark for the first time around 1800. It took ALL of human history to reach that mark. It took only 127 years (to around 1927) to reach 2 billion. It took only 33 years (to 1960) to reach 3 billion. And only 51 years later (6 years ago in 2011), the world's population reached 7 billion.

Population growth - Wikipedia

Off topic.
 
A few years ago, I recall being in a debate on a forum around Earth Day. Conservatives were, as usual, angry, defiant, and completely unwilling to listen to rational arguments about just about any subject. Global warming/Climate change was, of course, one of those topics. In fact, many conservatives hated the concept and the idea of Earth Day so much that they claimed they purposely turned on all the lights in their homes or simply ran the engines in their vehicles while they sat in their cars listening to their radios as some kind of protest. Frankly, it seemed silly and just plain childish to me. It still does. It reminded me of times when I've seen some child (and sometimes an adult) act in a destructive manner as a form of protest against something. As an example, a person might smash something of value in an effort to make a point, although the point they ultimately make is that they're both irrational and immature.

However, it's one thing to take a hammer to your own car in a fit of pique. It's another thing entirely to destroy your home where others in your family also live. But, I guess you can always move somewhere else, right? Well, not in the case of planet Earth. Earth is everyone's home, and if we (the collective we) destroy the sustainability of life on this planet, we've got nowhere else to go. And right now, the only people in the world who seem to be against trying to rise to meet the immense and growing challenge of climate change are American Conservatives.
There's no such thing as man-made global warming… jack weed

Only humans are extracting liquid, gaseous, and solid carbon from underground where it's been sequestered for millions of years in order to burn it for energy thereby placing it into the atmosphere where it acts as a catalyst for warming the Earth. You see, the greenhouse effect is not a complicated theory like quantum mechanics; it's Earth Science 101.

Apparently you've never heard of volcanoes or noticed that all animals exhale CO2 or noticed that CO2 is natural and necessary for life on Earth. You are just in denial about your cult foolishness. Far more theories turn out to be bullshit than proven fact.


I bet he thinks that we are a major source of CO2 on this planet as well and is completely unaware that we don't produce enough CO2 to even overcome the natural variation in the earth's own CO2 making machinery from year to year.

Well, the human population on Earth is estimated to have passed the 1 billion mark for the first time around 1800. It took ALL of human history to reach that mark. It took only 127 years (to around 1927) to reach 2 billion. It took only 33 years (to 1960) to reach 3 billion. And only 51 years later (6 years ago in 2011), the world's population reached 7 billion.

Population growth - Wikipedia
Well, why don't you start with you?
Put your money where your mouth is… Hypocrisy is in your blood
 

Forum List

Back
Top