AOC Says Being Required To Acually Have The Money A Dark Plan To Hamstring Extremist Health Care

[easyt65]

"Ocasio-Cortez broke with Pelosi Thursday by voting 'no' against a Democratic rules package. Two other progressives also opposed the rules: Hawaii Democratic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard and California Rep. Ro Khanna."

The move was an embrace of deficit spending / an acknowledgement / declaration that the Democrats planned to spend without having the money to fund their ideas, which 'PayGo' mandates.

"That rule requires that any new mandatory spending for entitlements or tax cuts be offset by other separate revenue increases (such as tax hikes) or budget-cutting measures so that the new spending does not expand the federal deficit."

AOC explained that, as she believes, actually being required to have the money to fund the Socialist Democrat agenda and socialist hand-outs they have planned - like their big government explosion and specifically their plan for a complete government take-over of health care - is a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring progress on healthcare".

"The democratic socialist characterized the rules package on Wednesday as a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring progress on healthcare" and other legislation."

I know what she means and agree with her fully - being required to ACTUALLY HAVE THE MONEY required for me to buy a huge new house, a car to go on elaborate vacations, and to live an elitist lifestyle is a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring MY progress".

 

[Brain357]

So they are going to spend like republicans? You should be happy.

 

[Pete7469]

I'd say someone dropped her on her head as a baby, but it seems more like they grabbed her by the feet and demolished a brick wall.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

"Ocasio-Cortez broke with Pelosi Thursday by voting 'no' against a Democratic rules package. Two other progressives also opposed the rules: Hawaii Democratic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard and California Rep. Ro Khanna."

The move was an embrace of deficit spending / an acknowledgement / declaration that the Democrats planned to spend without having the money to fund their ideas, which 'PayGo' mandates.

"That rule requires that any new mandatory spending for entitlements or tax cuts be offset by other separate revenue increases (such as tax hikes) or budget-cutting measures so that the new spending does not expand the federal deficit."

AOC explained that, as she believes, actually being required to have the money to fund the Socialist Democrat agenda and socialist hand-outs they have planned - like their big government explosion and specifically their plan for a complete government take-over of health care - is a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring progress on healthcare".

"The democratic socialist characterized the rules package on Wednesday as a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring progress on healthcare" and other legislation."

I know what she means and agree with her fully - being required to ACTUALLY HAVE THE MONEY required for me to buy a huge new house, a car to go on elaborate vacations, and to live an elitist lifestyle is a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring MY progress".

Yep, she fits right in with the folks already in congress that added $1,481,349,159,597 to the national debt in CY18.

Weird how you were cool with that when it was a GOP congress and Trump doing the spending.

This is why life sucks for you partisan sheep, you have to always change your views depending on who is in power.

 

[Votto]

"Ocasio-Cortez broke with Pelosi Thursday by voting 'no' against a Democratic rules package. Two other progressives also opposed the rules: Hawaii Democratic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard and California Rep. Ro Khanna."

The move was an embrace of deficit spending / an acknowledgement / declaration that the Democrats planned to spend without having the money to fund their ideas, which 'PayGo' mandates.

"That rule requires that any new mandatory spending for entitlements or tax cuts be offset by other separate revenue increases (such as tax hikes) or budget-cutting measures so that the new spending does not expand the federal deficit."

AOC explained that, as she believes, actually being required to have the money to fund the Socialist Democrat agenda and socialist hand-outs they have planned - like their big government explosion and specifically their plan for a complete government take-over of health care - is a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring progress on healthcare".

"The democratic socialist characterized the rules package on Wednesday as a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring progress on healthcare" and other legislation."

I know what she means and agree with her fully - being required to ACTUALLY HAVE THE MONEY required for me to buy a huge new house, a car to go on elaborate vacations, and to live an elitist lifestyle is a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring MY progress".

Crazy Eyes Cortez, the up and coming new Dims, will fight it tooth and nail because they know that their "free everything" message is at risk if such a measure were followed.

What the high school drop out does not understand though, is that this is smoke and mirrors. Just try to handicap spending with the two years Trump is there to stop the wall and then get a Dim in there and embrace "free medical care for all" and "free college for all", making the current spending by Trump look like a walk in the park.

Meanwhile, the continuing unrestricted immigration costs the US hundreds of billions of dollars a year.

 

[Oddball]

 

[Votto]

"Ocasio-Cortez broke with Pelosi Thursday by voting 'no' against a Democratic rules package. Two other progressives also opposed the rules: Hawaii Democratic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard and California Rep. Ro Khanna."

The move was an embrace of deficit spending / an acknowledgement / declaration that the Democrats planned to spend without having the money to fund their ideas, which 'PayGo' mandates.

"That rule requires that any new mandatory spending for entitlements or tax cuts be offset by other separate revenue increases (such as tax hikes) or budget-cutting measures so that the new spending does not expand the federal deficit."

AOC explained that, as she believes, actually being required to have the money to fund the Socialist Democrat agenda and socialist hand-outs they have planned - like their big government explosion and specifically their plan for a complete government take-over of health care - is a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring progress on healthcare".

"The democratic socialist characterized the rules package on Wednesday as a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring progress on healthcare" and other legislation."

I know what she means and agree with her fully - being required to ACTUALLY HAVE THE MONEY required for me to buy a huge new house, a car to go on elaborate vacations, and to live an elitist lifestyle is a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring MY progress".

Yep, she fits right in with the folks already in congress that added $1,481,349,159,597 to the national debt in CY18.

Weird how you were cool with that when it was a GOP congress and Trump doing the spending.

This is why life sucks for you partisan sheep, you have to always change your views depending on who is in power.

I wanna know how many trillions of dollars is being spent on about 200 drug overdose deaths every day in the US.

I wanna know exactly how many hundreds of billions of dollars is being spent on illegal entitlements in general

Seems to me that $5 billion is a deal compared to the carnage of an unsecure border.

 

[ZZ PUPPS]

AOC is not much more than a walking slab of meat with two bugged out eyez.

 

[Lesh]

"Ocasio-Cortez broke with Pelosi Thursday by voting 'no' against a Democratic rules package. Two other progressives also opposed the rules: Hawaii Democratic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard and California Rep. Ro Khanna."

The move was an embrace of deficit spending / an acknowledgement / declaration that the Democrats planned to spend without having the money to fund their ideas, which 'PayGo' mandates.

"That rule requires that any new mandatory spending for entitlements or tax cuts be offset by other separate revenue increases (such as tax hikes) or budget-cutting measures so that the new spending does not expand the federal deficit."

AOC explained that, as she believes, actually being required to have the money to fund the Socialist Democrat agenda and socialist hand-outs they have planned - like their big government explosion and specifically their plan for a complete government take-over of health care - is a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring progress on healthcare".

"The democratic socialist characterized the rules package on Wednesday as a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring progress on healthcare" and other legislation."

I know what she means and agree with her fully - being required to ACTUALLY HAVE THE MONEY required for me to buy a huge new house, a car to go on elaborate vacations, and to live an elitist lifestyle is a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring MY progress".

Crazy Eyes Cortez, the up and coming new Dims, will fight it tooth and nail because they know that their "free everything" message is at risk if such a measure were followed.

What the high school drop out does not understand though, is that this is smoke and mirrors. Just try to handicap spending with the two years Trump is there to stop the wall and then get a Dim in there and embrace "free medical care for all" and "free college for all", making the current spending by Trump look like a walk in the park.

Meanwhile, the continuing unrestricted immigration costs the US hundreds of billions of dollars a year.

How did the Repubs in the House vote on this?

WITH AOC?

 

[Harpy Eagle]

I wanna know how many trillions of dollars is being spent on about 200 drug overdose deaths every day in the US.

I wanna know exactly how many hundreds of billions of dollars is being spent on illegal entitlements in general

Seems to me that $5 billion is a deal compared to the carnage of an unsecure border.

There is this thing called the "internet", feel free to use it to find those answers.

 

[easyt65]

Weird how you were cool with that when it was a GOP congress and Trump doing the spending.

Weird how you are LYING, falsely claiming I support deficit spending by anyone.

Seems like you are saying if someone does not openly speak out against every single thing they oppose it means they support it....which would mean you must support bestiality and necrophilia, since I have never heard you speak out against them.

 

[EvilCat Breath]

When Occasional Cortex can't force all the other Democrats to go along with her perhaps she will split the entire party into warring factions.

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Weird how you were cool with that when it was a GOP congress and Trump doing the spending.

Weird how you are LYING, falsely claiming I support deficit spending by anyone.

Seems like you are saying if someone does not openly speak out against every single thing they oppose it means they support it....which would mean you must support bestiality and necrophilia, since I have never heard you speak out against them.

Why the thread about it today but zero threads about it during the two years your party and your god were in charge of the spending?

Why were you silent as a church mouse about it for 2 whole years but today is is not an issue?

 

[easyt65]

How did the Repubs in the House vote on this? WITH AOC?

To quote snowflakes in the past...

"...but, but, but....the GOP..." in attempting to divert the focus of the thread in defense of AOC and the Democrats.

 

[easyt65]

Why the thread about it today but zero threads about it during the two years your party and your god were in charge of the spending?

Because Cortez is a newly elected Congresswoman who has not been there for the last 2 years....check out the title of the thread....Helloooooooooo.

 

[Brain357]

"Ocasio-Cortez broke with Pelosi Thursday by voting 'no' against a Democratic rules package. Two other progressives also opposed the rules: Hawaii Democratic Rep. Tulsi Gabbard and California Rep. Ro Khanna."

The move was an embrace of deficit spending / an acknowledgement / declaration that the Democrats planned to spend without having the money to fund their ideas, which 'PayGo' mandates.

"That rule requires that any new mandatory spending for entitlements or tax cuts be offset by other separate revenue increases (such as tax hikes) or budget-cutting measures so that the new spending does not expand the federal deficit."

AOC explained that, as she believes, actually being required to have the money to fund the Socialist Democrat agenda and socialist hand-outs they have planned - like their big government explosion and specifically their plan for a complete government take-over of health care - is a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring progress on healthcare".

"The democratic socialist characterized the rules package on Wednesday as a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring progress on healthcare" and other legislation."

I know what she means and agree with her fully - being required to ACTUALLY HAVE THE MONEY required for me to buy a huge new house, a car to go on elaborate vacations, and to live an elitist lifestyle is a "dark political maneuver designed to hamstring MY progress".

Yep, she fits right in with the folks already in congress that added $1,481,349,159,597 to the national debt in CY18.

Weird how you were cool with that when it was a GOP congress and Trump doing the spending.

This is why life sucks for you partisan sheep, you have to always change your views depending on who is in power.

I wanna know how many trillions of dollars is being spent on about 200 drug overdose deaths every day in the US.

I wanna know exactly how many hundreds of billions of dollars is being spent on illegal entitlements in general

Seems to me that $5 billion is a deal compared to the carnage of an unsecure border.

It’s funny you think the border can be secured. We will have drugs as long as there is a demand. Cheap labor too!

 

[Harpy Eagle]

Why the thread about it today but zero threads about it during the two years your party and your god were in charge of the spending?

Because Cortez is a newly elected Congresswoman who has not been there for the last 2 years....check out the title of the thread....Helloooooooooo.

Thank you for admitting you only care about deficit spending when it is done by a new elected Dem.

I bet it felt good to come clean.

 

[Brain357]

Weird how you were cool with that when it was a GOP congress and Trump doing the spending.

Weird how you are LYING, falsely claiming I support deficit spending by anyone.

Seems like you are saying if someone does not openly speak out against every single thing they oppose it means they support it....which would mean you must support bestiality and necrophilia, since I have never heard you speak out against them.

Why the thread about it today but zero threads about it during the two years your party and your god were in charge of the spending?

Why were you silent as a church mouse about it for 2 whole years but today is is not an issue?

That’s how partisans roll...

 

[Lesh]

How did the Repubs in the House vote on this? WITH AOC?

To quote snowflakes in the past...

"...but, but, but....the GOP..." in attempting to divert the focus of the thread in defense of AOC and the Democrats.

My point...is that you are attacking AOC as if she's insane...when the fact is that most likely your GOP legislators voted WITH her.

Why are you making no mention of that? Hypocrisy?

 

[easyt65]

It’s funny you think the border can be secured. We will have drugs as long as there is a demand. Cheap labor too!

It's more 'funny' how snowflakes continue to ignore the proven fact that everywhere a border / barrier is erected illegal immigration / crossing goes down 95%...