AOC, OMG, on Byron Donald's duplicitous presentation.

[Arlette]

AOC grabbed some pussy

 

[Seymour Flops]

All the information you need is included on the video of AOC speaking. You only need to click on the link. Please don't..........

View attachment 835713

In other words, you got nothing but a clip of Big Booty whining (for a change, right?) about not the words, but the WAY that man put them.

The words were real, they show an ongoing influence peddling scheme involving Joe Biden, and he will be impeached.

 

[berg80]

AOC has earned the right to be ridiculed from all her past ignoramic statements. She's not too bright and not honorable in the least. Her constituency must be a bunch of uneducated masochists.

Attacking AOC does not make Donald's presentation honest. If he had included the entire text it would have shown the corrupt behavior he was implying occurred did not happen.

The larger point being the Repubs offered no first hand accounts of corruption to warrant an impeachment nor did they offer anything they haven't already accused Joe of doing which has consistently been absent of hard evidence.

 

[berg80]

The words were real, they show an ongoing influence peddling scheme involving Joe Biden

No, they don't. And that is the point. He used a photoshopped image of a screenshot to imply corruption when the full text disproves it.

 

[Auld Phart]

“Earlier today, one of our colleagues, the gentleman from Florida, presented up on the screen something that appeared to be a screenshot of a text message containing or insinuating an explosive allegation,” Ocasio-Cortez said during the hearing. “That screenshot of what appeared to be a text message was a fabricated image.”

Ocasio-Cortez slams Republicans for using ‘fabricated image’ in Biden hearing

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) slammed Republicans for using a “fabricated image” in the first impeachment inquiry hearing into President Biden. Speaker Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) launched a…

thehill.com

Rep. Byron Donald (R) pulled a Faux. He purposely presented "evidence" during the hearing designed, literally, to mislead those who viewed it. A US congressman used a doctored visual aide during about the most important thing Congress could consider, impeachment. It was a new low for Repubs when new lows are hard to come by given their repeated duplicity.

If a Dem had done this at any point during the impeachments of Trump it would have been highlighted 24/7 for days on end by right wing media. Days.

If a Dem had done this at any point during the impeachments of Trump

"IF"?

 

[Auld Phart]

What evidence did the Dems present during Trump's impeachments that was altered to give a false impression?

Schiffs parody of the phone call?

Which he admitted to on various talk shows?

 

[Hellokitty]

AOC presented evidence that was accepted by the Chairman showing Donald's material was intentionally presented without the context that completely changed its meaning. It was purposefully deceptive after Donald characterized it as "evidence."
He began the presentation saying, "now we're going to get to some evidence."

AOC never explained the context in the hearing or in linked video.

 

[DGS49]

So there was nothing false presented. The text was accurate. And the problem is......?

The Leftist theme seems to be that there is no "first hand" evidence of Biden's crimes. It is said so often that it is obviously coordinated. "First hand evidence" in this context would be one of the Biden's saying, on the record, that they solicited and accepted bribes.

Imagine the use of that expression in connection with the years-long Russia Collusion hoax. They never had any first hand evidence, or even credible circumstantial evidence to support their Narrative, and yet they strung this along to hamstring Trump during HALF OF HIS PRESIDENCY.

The Left is evil, and they keep proving it every fucking day.

 

[Oddball]

Am I wrong for thinking AOC isn't evil and means well but is just naive and has potential?

No I don't just wanna date her, she's pretty, but I couldn't stand that voice.

And she's not blonde. She's smart. She's not stupid.

I ain't letting some pretty girl lead me to communism.

 

[berg80]

AOC never explained the context in the hearing or in linked video.

She asked and received permission to put in to evidence the full text. The context of which blew up Donald's implication that the text showed something corrupt.

 

[berg80]

So there was nothing false presented. The text was accurate. And the problem is......?

The problem is the screenshot of the text was photoshopped to create a false impression.

 

[Hellokitty]

She asked and received permission to put in to evidence the full text. The context of which blew up Donald's implication that the text showed something corrupt.

So post where she put the text in context, or give us your understanding of the context since you must have read the full text.

 

[Papageorgio]

What evidence did the Dems present during Trump's impeachments that was altered to give a false impression?

Two..
1) In a graphic showing a Tweet, they added a blue check mark in an attempt to verify that the tweet was real. It was not. The House impeachment Democrats said "it was a mistake"... yeah.. somehow it was just added by mistake! And then later in the testimony on a tweet "We are bringing the Calvery" - they did it again! And then again said "it was a mistake".
2) They altered speech text given by Trump, and removed the words where he talked about peaceful protests, and switched words to make it appear they were said together.

You must of missed iamwhatiseem response, yet we never saw the 24/7 outrage claim you claim would of happened.

Politicians are who they are and dirty tricks belong to both parties. AOC being outraged is more fake outrage from a person who pretends a lot.

 

[berg80]

You must of missed iamwhatiseem response, yet we never saw the 24/7 outrage claim you claim would of happened.

Politicians are who they are and dirty tricks belong to both parties. AOC being outraged is more fake outrage from a person who pretends a lot.

I didn't miss it. I spent some time taking the salient excerpts of his post and putting them in a search window to see if I could verify them. I couldn't find anything.

Even if I could it wouldn't change a thing about Donald's misrepresentation.

 

[Papageorgio]

I didn't miss it. I spent some time taking the salient excerpts of his post and putting them in a search window to see if I could verify them. I couldn't find anything.

Even if I could it wouldn't change a thing about Donald's misrepresentation.

I know you wouldn't, most partisans ignore their lies and misrepresentations but not the oppositions. That is why ignore AOC false outrage, just politics as usual, like I posted earlier.

 

[22lcidw]

AOC has earned the right to be ridiculed from all her past ignoramic statements. She's not too bright and not honorable in the least. Her constituency must be a bunch of uneducated masochists.

Elon Musk called her stupid.

 

[berg80]

I know you wouldn't, most partisans ignore their lies and misrepresentations but not the oppositions. That is why ignore AOC false outrage, just politics as usual, like I posted earlier.

Byron Donalds omits key context about James Biden text message​

Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York accused a Republican member of the committee, Rep. Byron Donalds of Florida, of cutting out “critical context” from an image of a purported text message that Donalds displayed earlier in the Thursday hearing. Ocasio-Cortez also said that Donalds had displayed a “fabricated image.”

The dispute was over an image Donalds showed of a purported 2018 text message from the president’s brother James Biden to the president’s son Hunter Biden – provided by IRS whistleblowers and released by House Republicans on Wednesday – in which James Biden purportedly wrote, “This can work, you need a safe harbor. I can work with you father [sic] alone !! We as usual just need several months of his help for this to work.”

After showing the image, Donalds asked a witness at the committee, “If you saw a text message like this between the president’s brother and the president’s son, wouldn’t you be concerned about them trying to give plausible deniability for the president of the United States to not have any knowledge of said business dealings?”

Facts First: Donalds didn’t invent the James Biden text message, but Ocasio-Cortez was correct that Donalds left out critical context – specifically, context that showed there was no sign that the purported text exchange between James Biden and Hunter Biden was about business dealings. The information released by House Republicans this week appeared to show that James Biden’s purported text about getting “help” from Joe Biden came in direct response to a purported Hunter Biden text saying he could not afford alimony, school tuition for his children, food and gas “w/o [without] Dad.” Donalds did not display this purported Hunter Biden text at the Thursday hearing.

In other words, when James Biden purportedly mentioned the possibility of several months of help from Joe Biden, he gave no indication he was referring to some sort of business transaction, much less the foreign transactions that House Republicans have been focused on in their investigations into the president. But Donalds didn’t make that clear.

With that said, Ocasio-Cortez herself could have been clearer about what she meant when she claimed the image Donalds showed was “fabricated.”

The contents of the purported James Biden text Donalds displayed were not made up, according to the IRS whistleblowers. What appeared to be novel was the graphic Donalds used; he showed the text in a form that made it look like a screenshot from an iPhone text conversation, with white words over a blue background bubble. The House Republican spreadsheet that the words were taken from did not include any such graphics, and, again, it did include the preceding purported Hunter Biden message that Donalds didn’t show.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/28/politics/fact-check-house-impeachment-hearing-biden/index.html

I await your apology.

 

[The Duke]

View attachment 835723

 

[Papageorgio]

Byron Donalds omits key context about James Biden text message​

Democratic Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez of New York accused a Republican member of the committee, Rep. Byron Donalds of Florida, of cutting out “critical context” from an image of a purported text message that Donalds displayed earlier in the Thursday hearing. Ocasio-Cortez also said that Donalds had displayed a “fabricated image.”

The dispute was over an image Donalds showed of a purported 2018 text message from the president’s brother James Biden to the president’s son Hunter Biden – provided by IRS whistleblowers and released by House Republicans on Wednesday – in which James Biden purportedly wrote, “This can work, you need a safe harbor. I can work with you father [sic] alone !! We as usual just need several months of his help for this to work.”

After showing the image, Donalds asked a witness at the committee, “If you saw a text message like this between the president’s brother and the president’s son, wouldn’t you be concerned about them trying to give plausible deniability for the president of the United States to not have any knowledge of said business dealings?”

Facts First: Donalds didn’t invent the James Biden text message, but Ocasio-Cortez was correct that Donalds left out critical context – specifically, context that showed there was no sign that the purported text exchange between James Biden and Hunter Biden was about business dealings. The information released by House Republicans this week appeared to show that James Biden’s purported text about getting “help” from Joe Biden came in direct response to a purported Hunter Biden text saying he could not afford alimony, school tuition for his children, food and gas “w/o [without] Dad.” Donalds did not display this purported Hunter Biden text at the Thursday hearing.

In other words, when James Biden purportedly mentioned the possibility of several months of help from Joe Biden, he gave no indication he was referring to some sort of business transaction, much less the foreign transactions that House Republicans have been focused on in their investigations into the president. But Donalds didn’t make that clear.

With that said, Ocasio-Cortez herself could have been clearer about what she meant when she claimed the image Donalds showed was “fabricated.”

The contents of the purported James Biden text Donalds displayed were not made up, according to the IRS whistleblowers. What appeared to be novel was the graphic Donalds used; he showed the text in a form that made it look like a screenshot from an iPhone text conversation, with white words over a blue background bubble. The House Republican spreadsheet that the words were taken from did not include any such graphics, and, again, it did include the preceding purported Hunter Biden message that Donalds didn’t show.

https://www.cnn.com/2023/09/28/politics/fact-check-house-impeachment-hearing-biden/index.html

I await your apology.

For what? For you being a partisan and only seeing one side, it is all politics. I didn’t say what was done in the hearing wasn’t done, I am saying it happened during the Trump impeachment and it didn’t bother you, that is because you are a partisan and both sides play the same game.

 

[22lcidw]

She asked and received permission to put in to evidence the full text. The context of which blew up Donald's implication that the text showed something corrupt.

We do not believe AOC. She already outed herself when first elected. Watching the politicians who were around for many endless decades put her in the forefront at public events and she talking like a special needs child was enough. People like Schumer showed their true colors if they did not do that before. If she goes far, it will prove we are a third world nation. She would fit in well with Venezuela's as an example. Ad we all know that there are many Venezuelans sneaking int our nation as a result of their Progressive Socialist communist policies.