jillian
Princess
'The Birth of a Nation' white guilt movie set to lose $10-million - DailyKenn.com
HaHa. That was expected
an anti-slavery movie isn't anti white you lowlife kkk alt right loon
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
'The Birth of a Nation' white guilt movie set to lose $10-million - DailyKenn.com
HaHa. That was expected
'The Birth of a Nation' white guilt movie set to lose $10-million - DailyKenn.com
HaHa. That was expected
an anti-slavery movie isn't anti white you lowlife kkk alt right loon
You can make an anti white movie. But you can't make an anti Jew movie. Ask Mel Gibson.
What anti jew movie did Mel Gibson try to make.
To the jews that run hollywood Passion of the Christ was anti jew because it rightfully placed blame on the jews for having christ killed. I am not even a christian but I went and saw that the day it opened SIMPLY because 1. Jews HATED it and 2. I love Mel Gibson movies.You can make an anti white movie. But you can't make an anti Jew movie. Ask Mel Gibson.
What anti jew movie did Mel Gibson try to make.
I never saw it. But anything that promotes Christianity also promotes Judaism. That's why the jew controlled movie studios over many decades have made zillions of movies about Jesus or Christianity in general.
Yeah, they thought it was actually worth that much, but it turns out that it wasnt. Not even close. They bought a lemon.
To the jews that run hollywood Passion of the Christ was anti jew because it rightfully placed blame on the jews for having christ killed. I am not even a christian but I went and saw that the day it opened SIMPLY because 1. Jews HATED it and 2. I love Mel Gibson movies.You can make an anti white movie. But you can't make an anti Jew movie. Ask Mel Gibson.
What anti jew movie did Mel Gibson try to make.
I never saw it. But anything that promotes Christianity also promotes Judaism. That's why the jew controlled movie studios over many decades have made zillions of movies about Jesus or Christianity in general.
What promotes Christianity doesn't usually promote Judaism, because Jews reject and hate Christianity.
To the jews that run hollywood Passion of the Christ was anti jew because it rightfully placed blame on the jews for having christ killed. I am not even a christian but I went and saw that the day it opened SIMPLY because 1. Jews HATED it and 2. I love Mel Gibson movies.You can make an anti white movie. But you can't make an anti Jew movie. Ask Mel Gibson.
What anti jew movie did Mel Gibson try to make.
I never saw it. But anything that promotes Christianity also promotes Judaism. That's why the jew controlled movie studios over many decades have made zillions of movies about Jesus or Christianity in general.
What promotes Christianity doesn't usually promote Judaism, because Jews reject and hate Christianity.
It doesn't matter what jews think. Christians lick the balls of jews, despite what they think. Because to a Christian, helping the jews proves the power of their imaginary god. I saw an American evangelist in israel once who was talking to a group of jews in a restaurant and telling them that they really needed to stick to their guns and protect the "holy land." I also happened across a fund raiser on some Christian channel once. They were trying to raise money to send poor jews to israel. Screw the jews and the Christians they rode in on.
Awesome movie. I have already seen it 2 times. Going back for a third viewing.
What a shocker. A pro black movie that deals with Slavery and was only shown in a limited amount of theaters didnt do as well as other movies like comedies or that are widely released?
That is shocking.
The obvious is the title. The original movie had a major effect on the raacial narrative still in play today. This movie boldly takes a punch at that effect by brazenly using the same name.Awesome movie. I have already seen it 2 times. Going back for a third viewing.
3 times? That's quite an endorsement of the movie. What are your thoughts on the film?
How do you know if it was accurate or not? Did you live through it or are you depending on the documentation of white people from that period in time?It was certainly not very accurate, historically, on a tactical level but on a strategic level I thought it gave a good accounting about slavery from the black point of view. Not just that is was brutal and unjust, but that it was morally wrong as well. I get that this was a theatrical release but I would have preferred to see a well made up to date documentary type film on this subject.
It fell flat for me.
The analogy comparing blacks and whites to fleas and dogs.The only reason why you can make that analogy is because non-whites are brainwashed.You can have pro-white movies without being anti anyone else.
Most of the movies in your list are a load of crap. Some are neutral about Whites at best. And look at a couple pictures made by the jewish owned movie studios. Death Wish and The Naked Prey. They starred jews. Many famous actors back then were. (And many today are) Such as Tony Curtis, Yul Brynner, Edward G Robinson, Marilyn Monroe, etc. times zillions. No doubt the ones made by the jew controlled movie studios that seemed neutral about Whites probably had some sort of anti-White subliminal message in them.
You can't have a real pro-White movie without being anti other species of human. Just as many movies are openly anti-White. Just a few of those are "The Last Samurai," "Pleasantville" and "American History X."
I hope you're agreeing with me. Because indeed, you can't make a pro-dog movie unless it is anti-flea.The only reason why you can make that analogy is because non-whites are brainwashed.You can have pro-white movies without being anti anyone else.
Most of the movies in your list are a load of crap. Some are neutral about Whites at best. And look at a couple pictures made by the jewish owned movie studios. Death Wish and The Naked Prey. They starred jews. Many famous actors back then were. (And many today are) Such as Tony Curtis, Yul Brynner, Edward G Robinson, Marilyn Monroe, etc. times zillions. No doubt the ones made by the jew controlled movie studios that seemed neutral about Whites probably had some sort of anti-White subliminal message in them.
You can't have a real pro-White movie without being anti other species of human. Just as many movies are openly anti-White. Just a few of those are "The Last Samurai," "Pleasantville" and "American History X."
I hope you're agreeing with me. Because indeed, you can't make a pro-dog movie unless it is anti-flea.
What analogy are you speaking of. And Whites are even more brainwashed than non-whites. Because most of the brainwashing is directed at Whites.