Another Korean war?

Discussion in 'Asia' started by Philobeado, Jun 6, 2009.

  1. Philobeado
    Offline

    Philobeado Active Member

    Joined:
    Apr 8, 2009
    Messages:
    566
    Thanks Received:
    172
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Location:
    Gulf of Mexico Coast, Texas
    Ratings:
    +173
    North Korea threatens to engulf the Korean Peninsula in an all-out war. Pyongyang's recent test of a nuclear bomb poses a serious threat to international security and regional stability.

    Dictator Kim Jong-il continues to thumb his nose at global leaders, especially President Obama. The ailing strongman has denuded Mr. Obama on the world stage, revealing his soft-power strategy to be ineffective and reckless.

    Washington's emphasis on diplomacy was supposed to facilitate rogue states into increased cooperation. Instead, it has only emboldened the likes of North Korea (and Iran) to press ahead with their nuclear-weapons programs. Mr. Obama's "open hand" has been met with Mr. Kim's iron fist - one that has smashed Uncle Sam in the face.

    The hermit Stalinist regime is not only unstable and repressive, but also dangerous. Pyongyang has formed an anti-American axis with Tehran and Damascus. It is involved in narcotics trafficking, counterfeiting and the smuggling of illicit weapons. Last year alone, North Korean state-run companies sold more than $1.5 billion in arms to unsavory autocracies such as Iran, Syria, Myanmar and Egypt.

    North Korea is a brutal police state characterized by one-party rule and totalitarian social control. Political corruption is rampant. Leninist economic planning is fused with jingoistic militarism. The result has been a failed nation - a starving, miserable population; a landscape blotted with slave-labor camps; and a country in which electricity and running water are luxuries for the privileged few.

    Pyongyang is also one of the leading nuclear proliferators. U.S. and Israeli intelligence officials say North Korea has supplied Iran's mullahs with key missile components. During Mr. Kim's first nuclear-bomb test in 2006, Iranian technicians were present as observers. In 2007, North Korean scientists built Syria's clandestine nuclear reactor before it was destroyed by an Israeli airstrike. By successfully detonating a nuclear device, Mr. Kim has sent a powerful message: He is ready to sell weapons of mass destruction (WMD) as well as vital missile technology to jihadists and terrorist-sponsoring regimes.

    Desperate to prop up the Obama administration, the liberal mainstream media have downplayed the North Korean menace. They present Mr. Kim as an erratic, spoiled child who seeks some international attention. Rather, the opposite is true: He is a sadistic and deadly serious tyrant whose test was an advertisement for his modernized arsenal of death. Call it North Korea 2.0.

    This is why South Korea has called for a get-tough approach. It has cut off foreign aid to the North, demanded tougher United Nations sanctions and put its military on heightened alert. Moreover, Seoul is partnering with the United States to patrol the waters near North Korea. South Korean and American ships will seek to prevent North Korean weapons smuggling. But Pyongyang is warning that any attempts to board or intercept its vessels will trigger a military response. In fact, it has threatened to abandon the armistice signed with Seoul following the 1950-53 war - an act, however, it has repeatedly committed in the past. Whether this is more of the usual North Korean bluster remains to be seen. Yet the Russian Foreign Ministry has warned that the escalating situation may spark a nuclear conflict on the peninsula.

    Mr. Obama and the so-called "realists" at the State Department are determined to have Pyongyang rejoin the six-party talks. Yet it is precisely the emphasis on multilateral diplomacy that has led to the present crisis. Mr. Kim, like his fellow strongman, Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, is determined to erect a nuclear state - no matter what the cost. Mr. Kim believes (rightly) that having a nuclear deterrent will inoculate his regime from a Western military attack, thereby ensuring its survival. For fanatical tin-pot dictators, talks are simply a cover to attain the bomb.

    The dirty little secret is that the Obama administration knows this. It no longer really cares to dismantle Pyongyang's nuclear program. If it did, it would have launched a surgical airstrike to knock out North Korea's missile launch in April. Such a bold move would have told the Stalinist leadership - and its chief sponsor, Red China - that Washington was serious about curbing its WMD capabilities. It would have put Tehran's Islamic fascists on notice. Instead, Mr. Obama pursues a reckless policy of appeasement.

    The road to Pyongyang goes through Beijing. For years, the Chinese government has subsidized the reclusive North Korean state. China supplies about 90 percent of North Korea's oil, 80 percent of its consumer goods and nearly half of its food. If Beijing wanted to rein in Pyongyang, it would reduce - or even end - its support. This would cause the teetering North Korean economy to implode and lead to the one thing China fears most: the reunification of the peninsula under the authority of Seoul. Hence, Beijing's primary goal is to keep North Korea as a political vassal.

    The North Korean crisis reveals the bankruptcy of both Mr. Obama's foreign and fiscal policy. Obamanomics is predicated on massive government spending and borrowing. The results are crippling budget deficits and a soaring public debt. The only way to sustain this deficit-financed statism is to have foreign powers - such as China - purchase our debt. This means we are slowly losing our economic and national sovereignty; increasingly, we are no longer in control of our own destiny - both at home or abroad.

    We have lost our freedom of action to pressure China to disarm one of the deadliest outlaw regimes on Earth. America will rue the day.
    KUHNER: Another Korean war? - Washington Times
     
  2. Sweet Willy
    Offline

    Sweet Willy BANNED

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    2,637
    Thanks Received:
    180
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +180
    N. Korea has to be dealt with. And we've known that for just a tad bit longer than 5 months.

    Wouldn't you agree?
     
  3. Midnight Marauder
    Offline

    Midnight Marauder BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2009
    Messages:
    12,404
    Thanks Received:
    1,876
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +1,876
    No. It's still the same one. That war is officially still on, there's merely been a cease fire for all these nearly 60 years.
     
  4. Sweet Willy
    Offline

    Sweet Willy BANNED

    Joined:
    May 20, 2009
    Messages:
    2,637
    Thanks Received:
    180
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +180
    Yep. We stood down and gave them all that time. For what? A fair fight?

    Insurrection is unlikely. We don't asassinate these days but maybe the S. Koreans can get someone close.
     
  5. Citizen
    Offline

    Citizen Active Member

    Joined:
    May 27, 2009
    Messages:
    237
    Thanks Received:
    61
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +61
    We have known it since before General Douglas MacArthur was removed from command by then President Harry S. Truman for wanting to go ahead and defeat North Korea, thus winning the Korean War.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  6. Midnight Marauder
    Offline

    Midnight Marauder BANNED

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2009
    Messages:
    12,404
    Thanks Received:
    1,876
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +1,876
    Mac wanted to nuke China. And he was insubordinate. You getting this?
     
  7. Soaring
    Offline

    Soaring Active Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    502
    Thanks Received:
    91
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +91
    I've never heard of MC wanting to nuke China, but he certainly wanted to push into North Korea and take them out. Maybe because China was helping the N. Koreans by supplying tens of thousands of troops to fight the Americans was the reason why MC wanted to nuke China. Don't know....but it is plausible. That would have made sense back then.
     
  8. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,599
    Thanks Received:
    5,914
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +9,030
    Dumb ASS, MacArthur is partly to blame for the Chinese Intervention. The Chinese wanted no war. The Soviets sponsored and supported the North Koreans in the first war.

    As we moved into North Korea the Soviets knew they could not fight us because of the Nuclear threat. They did not have reliable means to deliver the few bombs they had and Truman THREATENED them with Nuclear war.

    So they started rabble rousing in China. China had just finished their take over of Mainland China and were not prepared for a war at all. They did not have the weapons or the ammo.

    Now add in Mac DEMANDING in the PAPERS we bomb China and INVADE CHINA. Great plan that, ehh?

    Ohh and before the Chinese invaded? We did occupy North Korea.
     
  9. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,599
    Thanks Received:
    5,914
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +9,030
    China was not aiding the Korean's at all. They were in position to do so having JUST finished the conquest of Mainland China in 49. When they invaded about half their troops did not even have rifles and their ammo supply was critically short. They had no logistics train either. No real air force either.

    The SOVIETS played the west for fools. THEY not china armed and supported North Korea for that war. THEY provided aircraft and pilots. They allowed said aircraft to base in the Soviet Union.

    Mac DEMANDED in the papers we attack China and yes that included the use of the Atomic Bomb. Truman ordered him to shut up. He refused. He was fired for disobeying the President. He should have been tried for helping bring in the Chinese.
     
  10. Soaring
    Offline

    Soaring Active Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2009
    Messages:
    502
    Thanks Received:
    91
    Trophy Points:
    28
    Ratings:
    +91
    Well, at any rate, the reason why we didn't go ahead and take over N. Korea was because of the massive amount of Chinese troops that poured into N. Korea. They were armed.
     

Share This Page