Another GOP Lawmaker Misleads Public On Violence Against Women Act

Lakhota

Diamond Member
Jul 14, 2011
159,358
75,515
2,330
Native America


Another member of Congress is misleading constituents about past support for the Violence Against Women Act, a law whose protections Republicans allowed to briefly expire in 2013 for the first time since its passage two decades ago.

An ad released by Rep. Lynn Jenkins (R-Kan.) on Tuesday claims the congresswoman "stood up to her own party to champion the Violence Against Women Act to make women safer and she won."

The 30-second spot, which centers on women's issues, appears to embellish Jenkins' role in the matter. It cites Jenkins' vote for a bipartisan Senate bill that reauthorized the law but also left out expanded protections for victims of domestic violence who were Native American, undocumented immigrants, or lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender. In that vote, Jenkins joined a relatively large number of Republicans, 87, who also apparently "stood up" to their party. Moreover, while she may have "championed" that vote, Jenkins' record on the matter suggests otherwise. In 2012, she voted to prevent consideration of VAWA reauthorization bills in the House.

More: Another GOP Lawmaker Misleads Public On Violence Against Women Act

Why do they just keep on lying? Do they think no one will notice?
 


Another member of Congress is misleading constituents about past support for the Violence Against Women Act, a law whose protections Republicans allowed to briefly expire in 2013 for the first time since its passage two decades ago.

An ad released by Rep. Lynn Jenkins (R-Kan.) on Tuesday claims the congresswoman "stood up to her own party to champion the Violence Against Women Act to make women safer and she won."

The 30-second spot, which centers on women's issues, appears to embellish Jenkins' role in the matter. It cites Jenkins' vote for a bipartisan Senate bill that reauthorized the law but also left out expanded protections for victims of domestic violence who were Native American, undocumented immigrants, or lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender. In that vote, Jenkins joined a relatively large number of Republicans, 87, who also apparently "stood up" to their party. Moreover, while she may have "championed" that vote, Jenkins' record on the matter suggests otherwise. In 2012, she voted to prevent consideration of VAWA reauthorization bills in the House.

More: Another GOP Lawmaker Misleads Public On Violence Against Women Act

Why do they just keep on lying? Do they think no one will notice?


Ok instead of being a far left Hack using a far left Hack site for your "facts", how about post the actual bill so we can see if it misleading
 


Another member of Congress is misleading constituents about past support for the Violence Against Women Act, a law whose protections Republicans allowed to briefly expire in 2013 for the first time since its passage two decades ago.

An ad released by Rep. Lynn Jenkins (R-Kan.) on Tuesday claims the congresswoman "stood up to her own party to champion the Violence Against Women Act to make women safer and she won."

The 30-second spot, which centers on women's issues, appears to embellish Jenkins' role in the matter. It cites Jenkins' vote for a bipartisan Senate bill that reauthorized the law but also left out expanded protections for victims of domestic violence who were Native American, undocumented immigrants, or lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender. In that vote, Jenkins joined a relatively large number of Republicans, 87, who also apparently "stood up" to their party. Moreover, while she may have "championed" that vote, Jenkins' record on the matter suggests otherwise. In 2012, she voted to prevent consideration of VAWA reauthorization bills in the House.

More: Another GOP Lawmaker Misleads Public On Violence Against Women Act

Why do they just keep on lying? Do they think no one will notice?


Ok instead of being a far left Hack using a far left Hack site for your "facts", how about post the actual bill so we can see if it misleading


Are you too dumb to click on the live "vote" links in the OP article?
 
yet, women want to join the military and go out of their way to be in violence. They do want to be men, right? Hypercritical and all.


Guess what, being a man = violence and fighting sometimes. I bet you think nothing when women attack and strike their boyfriends or husbands.
 

Forum List

Back
Top