Exhibit A.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Exhibit A.
Esmeralda. You really need to improve your reading skills. I never said I worked at that school... I simply said this is where the incident took place.
Now thanks to DGS49 I think we can put the matter to rest.
FreddyMuscle said:Thirty years ago, kids didn't have easy access to the types of weaponry they have today. Schoolyard fights are nothing new, but they used to be settled with fists... then it went to knives... now no one can ever be sure what a kid is carrying. For example, on the first day of this school year, a student pulled out a shot-gun in the cafeteria and proceeded to blast another kid.. not an isolated incident either. On another occassion, I personally disarmed a student that was aiming a handgun at a classmate. The kid with the gun was back in school the next day.
William Faulkner does not write in any way like the OP's 'letter.' Nothing like it. Take out some Faulkner and compare it.
Absolum Absolum.?
One of his sentences is over 1200 words long.
You are entitled to you opinions regarding style, of course.
But your opinion that a style of highly complex sentence structure and florid language is archaic is highly misinformed.If you want to understand Faulkner's style better, I suggest you actually read him, and not just one or two passages from specific works. I recommend The Sound and the Fury and "A Rose for Emily."
I used him to show you that your theory that modern prose style is the only acceptable modern style is misinformed.
If you are hoping to use him as a representative of purple prose, you would be mistaken.
I see that you are objecting to the CONTENT of Freddy's post...i.e. "purple prose".
I really was not addressing content, but simply to your objection to his style.
If you are trying to compare his style to what the OP wrote in his original post, well, all I can say is that it's clear you are not a student of serious literature or knowledgeable about what is considered good writing.
But, anyway, I'm not going to continue with this. I do know whereof I speak in this particular discipline and art form. Arguing with people who don't is not interesting or worth my time and effort. It's comparable to stopping on the highway and trying to talk people out of buying velvet Elvis paintings because they are not good art. Not worth the effort or trouble. Believe what you want.
Thank for allowing me to believe what I want.
As far as the OP, he has proven himself as not worthy of a respectful reply.
You object to the point of Freddy's rant ergo you attack him based on your self proclaimed expertise regarding STYLE?
What hubris.