All you want to know about Ted Cruz!

Status
Not open for further replies.

1stRambo

Gold Member
Feb 8, 2015
6,221
1,019
255
"Three reasons Ted Cruz Will win"

First: Ted Cruz matches up with the activist base better than any other significant candidate in a long time. I don’t think people outside of that base really understand how powerful Cruz’s appeal is to the populist energized conservative voter, which is of course just a faction of the right, but is a sizable faction. Cruz’s critics need to hope that he is limited to this faction, and incapable of appealing outside of it. But that may not prove to be the case, particularly if Cruz is able to cut into the appeal of, say, Walker for pro-business types, Huckabee for social conservatives, Paul for libertarianish Republicans and the like. And he doesn’t just match up with them on policy, he matches up with their brashness, their yearning for someone who loves the taste of blood in his mouth. Cruz was the only guy on the stage at the Iowa Ag gathering to basically give the whole room the finger on ethanol. His words are sweet music to the conservative right which has wanted a capable fighter for so long. Here’s a guy who’ll fight the lion and the midgets at the same time.

Second: To the degree that this is a nomination battle about who has done the most to fight the Obama administration about two key issues – amnesty and Obamacare – Ted Cruz can claim that mantle and beat his opponents over the head with their stances on these topics. We underestimate how going soft on both of these issues is going to play in the GOP primary this cycle, particularly in the early going. As I’ve noted before, most of the candidates this time around are in roughly the same position on immigration: either full throatedly in favor of reform or tepidly in favor of it. But there is no indication that the position of the party base is at all moderated compared to 2012, and Obama’s approach to executive amnesty has made the issue all the more toxic. Cruz can argue that his only fault is boldness – that when the party balked about doing its utmost to stop Obamacare, he went to the mattresses, and it led to sweeping wins at the ballot box. And when it comes to immigration, he will attack Jeb, Rubio, Christie, Huckabee, Walker, and others as being soft on the issue or tacitly in favor of what Obama did by executive action. The faction of the right that will punish him on both these counts was never going to support him anyway, so he can afford to be the full-throated champion on both fronts.

And third: While the “purest” conservative candidate rarely wins, that assumes a divided right. Cruz may end up running in a field where the other candidates are scrabbling over support from the Chamber of Commerce, Wall Street, and establishment dollars while he could corner the populist talk radio base. Cruz’s critics need to hope that Rick Perry, Bobby Jindal, Rand Paul and others horn in on this area of the right – because if the election includes a crowded field outside of that faction – including Bush, Christie, Huckabee, Walker, Rubio, and say Kasich – that only serves to help Cruz’s case.

Yo, need some tissues? Well tough shit, get use to it Socialist!

"GTP"

"OBAMA SUCKS"
Cruz.jpg
 
"Three reasons Ted Cruz Will win"

First: Ted Cruz matches up with the activist base better than any other significant candidate in a long time. I don’t think people outside of that base really understand how powerful Cruz’s appeal is to the populist energized conservative voter, which is of course just a faction of the right, but is a sizable faction. Cruz’s critics need to hope that he is limited to this faction, and incapable of appealing outside of it. But that may not prove to be the case, particularly if Cruz is able to cut into the appeal of, say, Walker for pro-business types, Huckabee for social conservatives, Paul for libertarianish Republicans and the like. And he doesn’t just match up with them on policy, he matches up with their brashness, their yearning for someone who loves the taste of blood in his mouth. Cruz was the only guy on the stage at the Iowa Ag gathering to basically give the whole room the finger on ethanol. His words are sweet music to the conservative right which has wanted a capable fighter for so long. Here’s a guy who’ll fight the lion and the midgets at the same time.

Second: To the degree that this is a nomination battle about who has done the most to fight the Obama administration about two key issues – amnesty and Obamacare – Ted Cruz can claim that mantle and beat his opponents over the head with their stances on these topics. We underestimate how going soft on both of these issues is going to play in the GOP primary this cycle, particularly in the early going. As I’ve noted before, most of the candidates this time around are in roughly the same position on immigration: either full throatedly in favor of reform or tepidly in favor of it. But there is no indication that the position of the party base is at all moderated compared to 2012, and Obama’s approach to executive amnesty has made the issue all the more toxic. Cruz can argue that his only fault is boldness – that when the party balked about doing its utmost to stop Obamacare, he went to the mattresses, and it led to sweeping wins at the ballot box. And when it comes to immigration, he will attack Jeb, Rubio, Christie, Huckabee, Walker, and others as being soft on the issue or tacitly in favor of what Obama did by executive action. The faction of the right that will punish him on both these counts was never going to support him anyway, so he can afford to be the full-throated champion on both fronts.

And third: While the “purest” conservative candidate rarely wins, that assumes a divided right. Cruz may end up running in a field where the other candidates are scrabbling over support from the Chamber of Commerce, Wall Street, and establishment dollars while he could corner the populist talk radio base. Cruz’s critics need to hope that Rick Perry, Bobby Jindal, Rand Paul and others horn in on this area of the right – because if the election includes a crowded field outside of that faction – including Bush, Christie, Huckabee, Walker, Rubio, and say Kasich – that only serves to help Cruz’s case.

Yo, need some tissues? Well tough shit, get use to it Socialist!

"GTP"

"OBAMA SUCKS"
View attachment 38467

In his announcement he refered to Patrick Henry ( give me liberty or give me death). Liberals hate that!! What they stand for is give me welfare entitlements or give me death.
 
Populist conservative is an oxymoron, conservatives hate the masses.
 
I find it hilarious how the left wingers in the media and on this board have moved into full attack mode since he announced his candidacy.
 
Populist conservative is an oxymoron, conservatives hate the masses.
Liberal democrat is an oxymoron. Democrats HATE liberty.
You guys are the ones wanting to ban everything you find offensive and change the constitution in fundamental ways to protect the white christian "majority" from "those people".
Funny it's democrats attacking Hispanics. I myself have been attacked here on a PERSONAL level for being Hispanic.
 
Populist conservative is an oxymoron, conservatives hate the masses.
Liberal democrat is an oxymoron. Democrats HATE liberty.
You guys are the ones wanting to ban everything you find offensive and change the constitution in fundamental ways to protect the white christian "majority" from "those people".
Funny it's democrats attacking Hispanics. I myself have been attacked here on a PERSONAL level for being Hispanic.

Yo, its funny? Me Too? Oh well, they will just vote Republican when they find out the truth about the invader Socialist Party!!!

"GTP"
 
Populist conservative is an oxymoron, conservatives hate the masses.
Liberal democrat is an oxymoron. Democrats HATE liberty.
You guys are the ones wanting to ban everything you find offensive and change the constitution in fundamental ways to protect the white christian "majority" from "those people".
Funny it's democrats attacking Hispanics. I myself have been attacked here on a PERSONAL level for being Hispanic.
I don't play that shit. I do not see how anyone who embraces the mission of the social conservatives has any concern for liberty with all the sins they want to ban and the religious orthodoxy they want to force on our "christian" nation.
 
Liberal democrat is an oxymoron. Democrats HATE liberty.
You guys are the ones wanting to ban everything you find offensive and change the constitution in fundamental ways to protect the white christian "majority" from "those people".
"You Guys" is a pretty broad brush.
Besides, liberals tend to be the ones wanting to ban stuff.

There is a growing atheist conservative population. People like me that want the government to get the heck out of my life. I don't need christians like Barack Obama telling me what to do or how to behave.
 
Populist conservative is an oxymoron, conservatives hate the masses.
Liberal democrat is an oxymoron. Democrats HATE liberty.
You guys are the ones wanting to ban everything you find offensive and change the constitution in fundamental ways to protect the white christian "majority" from "those people".
Funny it's democrats attacking Hispanics. I myself have been attacked here on a PERSONAL level for being Hispanic.

Yo, its funny? Me Too? Oh well, they will just vote Republican when they find out the truth about the invader Socialist Party!!!

"GTP"
The very idea a Hispanic a brown person COULD win has them just coming apart. So much so they cannot contain their racist comments.

 
Liberal democrat is an oxymoron. Democrats HATE liberty.
You guys are the ones wanting to ban everything you find offensive and change the constitution in fundamental ways to protect the white christian "majority" from "those people".
"You Guys" is a pretty broad brush.
Besides, liberals tend to be the ones wanting to ban stuff.

There is a growing atheist conservative population. People like me that want the government to get the heck out of my life. I don't need christians like Barack Obama telling me what to do or how to behave.

I think a person is just as free to choose a faith as choosing no faith. But for democrats to call one out on race OR faith IS WRONG.
 
I think a person is just as free to choose a faith as choosing no faith. But for democrats to call one out on race OR faith IS WRONG.
I agree.
Even as an atheist, I don't mind if somebody has faith or religion, that's their business.
Democrats sure like to make race and religion an issue, but only as it suits them.
Racists are wrong, always.
Theology isn't always wrong even when I disagree with it.
 
I think a person is just as free to choose a faith as choosing no faith. But for democrats to call one out on race OR faith IS WRONG.
I agree.
Even as an atheist, I don't mind if somebody has faith or religion, that's their business.
Democrats sure like to make race and religion an issue, but only as it suits them.
Racists are wrong, always.
Theology isn't always wrong even when I disagree with it.
I myself do NOT have religion I have faith.
Religion is faith with man's trappings. Faith is PURE without the dogma.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Forum List

Back
Top