All The News Anti-Palestinian Posters Will Not Read Or Discuss

[P F Tinmore]

Indeed, the armistice lines merely defined areas of occupation.

So now the

Indeed, the armistice lines merely defined areas of occupation.

So the Armistice lines defined by the U.N. in 1949 really weren’t Borders? Good. That means the “ 67 Borders “ never existed so Israel is under no obligation to go back to them.

Israel needs to withdraw to its real borders.

Then "withdraw" is the wrong term.
Real border is all of the mandate.
Giving away Gaza was an act of great generosity.

Israel should liberate Judea in the next 5 years or Judea liberates itself, with rest of Israel.

Real border is all of the mandate.

Indeed, those apply to everyone with Palestinian citizenship.

The implementation of Palestinian citizenship was issued in unequal terms.

Millions of Jews were banned from exercising their rights in a state that was established specifically with the purpose of ensuring their self determination.
The citizenship was of a British colony, not an Arab state, and surely not independent.

The citizenship was of a British colony, not an Arab state,

You are so full of misinformation. (Israeli bullshit propaganda.)
--------------------
With regard to nationality of the inhabitants of mandated territories, in general, the Council of the League of Nations adopted the following resolution on 23 April 1923:

• 92 League of Nations, Official Journal, June 1923, p. 604. For background information on this resolut (...)

“(1) The status of the native inhabitants of a Mandated territory is distinct from that of the nationals of the Mandatory Power....
(2) The native inhabitants of a Mandated territory are not invested with the nationality of the Mandatory Power by means of the protection extended to them…”92

Then you draw your conclusions on false premise.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Israel has borders?
Link?

We hear so much about the “ 67 Borders” If they don’t exist Israeli doesn’t have to return to

Israel has borders?
Link?

We hear so much about the “ 67 Borders” If they don’t exist Israeli doesn’t have to return to them

Indeed, the armistice lines merely defined areas of occupation.

So now the

Israel has borders?
Link?

We hear so much about the “ 67 Borders” If they don’t exist Israeli doesn’t have to return to them

Indeed, the armistice lines merely defined areas of occupation.

So the Armistice lines defined by the U.N. in 1949 really weren’t Borders? Good. That means the “ 67 Borders “ never existed so Israel is under no obligation to go back to them.

Israel needs to withdraw to its real borders.

Tell us please what you think those “ real Borders” are since you feel that the creation is Israel is “ occupation “.

Palestine's international borders were referenced in the 1949 UN Armistice Agreements. (that Israel signed)

 

[rylah]

So now the
So the Armistice lines defined by the U.N. in 1949 really weren’t Borders? Good. That means the “ 67 Borders “ never existed so Israel is under no obligation to go back to them.

Israel needs to withdraw to its real borders.

Then "withdraw" is the wrong term.
Real border is all of the mandate.
Giving away Gaza was an act of great generosity.

Israel should liberate Judea in the next 5 years or Judea liberates itself, with rest of Israel.

Real border is all of the mandate.

Indeed, those apply to everyone with Palestinian citizenship.

The implementation of Palestinian citizenship was issued in unequal terms.

Millions of Jews were banned from exercising their rights in a state that was established specifically with the purpose of ensuring their self determination.
The citizenship was of a British colony, not an Arab state, and surely not independent.

The citizenship was of a British colony, not an Arab state,

You are so full of misinformation. (Israeli bullshit propaganda.)
--------------------
With regard to nationality of the inhabitants of mandated territories, in general, the Council of the League of Nations adopted the following resolution on 23 April 1923:

• 92 League of Nations, Official Journal, June 1923, p. 604. For background information on this resolut (...)

“(1) The status of the native inhabitants of a Mandated territory is distinct from that of the nationals of the Mandatory Power....
(2) The native inhabitants of a Mandated territory are not invested with the nationality of the Mandatory Power by means of the protection extended to them…”92

Then you draw your conclusions on false premise.

Ok, how does that contradict my statement?
Citizens of British colonies weren't direct citizens of Britain, they were citizens of colonies, not of any independent nation. Virtually every group opposed their rule.

Now You go pretending it was an Arab state, with Jerusalem as a capital.
If a British colony is the only time Arabs claim they had a state with a capital in Jerusalem, then the argument is evidently self defeating.

 

[rylah]

Arabs specifically built a different city for a capital.
Build new capital, in the land of Jerusalem??
Classic Arab colonialism.

Ramla

According to the 9th-century Arab geographer Ya'qubi, ar-Ramleh (Ramla) was founded in 716 by the governor of the Ummayad District of Palestine (Jund Filastin), Sulayman ibn Abd al-Malik, brother and successor of Caliph Walid I. Its name was derived from the Arabic word raml (رمل), meaning sand.[8] The name of La Rambla, a major street of Barcelona, is ultimately derived from the same linguistic origin. The early residents came from nearby Ludd (Lydda, Lod). Ramla flourished as the capital of Jund Filastin, which was one of the five districts of the Syrian province of the Ummayad and Abbasid empires.[9]

Ramla was the principal city and district capital almost until the arrival of the Crusaders in the 11th century.

Ramla - Wikipedia

 

[USAF 2023]

We hear so much about the “ 67 Borders” If they don’t exist Israeli doesn’t have to return to

We hear so much about the “ 67 Borders” If they don’t exist Israeli doesn’t have to return to them

Indeed, the armistice lines merely defined areas of occupation.

So now the

We hear so much about the “ 67 Borders” If they don’t exist Israeli doesn’t have to return to them

Indeed, the armistice lines merely defined areas of occupation.

So the Armistice lines defined by the U.N. in 1949 really weren’t Borders? Good. That means the “ 67 Borders “ never existed so Israel is under no obligation to go back to them.

Israel needs to withdraw to its real borders.

Tell us please what you think those “ real Borders” are since you feel that the creation is Israel is “ occupation “.

Palestine's international borders were referenced in the 1949 UN Armistice Agreements. (that Israel signed)

You mean the borders that the Arabs did not recognize or respect?

 

[rylah]

We hear so much about the “ 67 Borders” If they don’t exist Israeli doesn’t have to return to

We hear so much about the “ 67 Borders” If they don’t exist Israeli doesn’t have to return to them

Indeed, the armistice lines merely defined areas of occupation.

So now the

We hear so much about the “ 67 Borders” If they don’t exist Israeli doesn’t have to return to them

Indeed, the armistice lines merely defined areas of occupation.

So the Armistice lines defined by the U.N. in 1949 really weren’t Borders? Good. That means the “ 67 Borders “ never existed so Israel is under no obligation to go back to them.

Israel needs to withdraw to its real borders.

Tell us please what you think those “ real Borders” are since you feel that the creation is Israel is “ occupation “.

Palestine's international borders were referenced in the 1949 UN Armistice Agreements. (that Israel signed)

Israel was the only nation, with whom Arab states signed those lines concerning Palestine.
It confirms Israeli legal sovereignty over all of Mandatory Palestine.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Indeed, the armistice lines merely defined areas of occupation.

So now the

Indeed, the armistice lines merely defined areas of occupation.

So the Armistice lines defined by the U.N. in 1949 really weren’t Borders? Good. That means the “ 67 Borders “ never existed so Israel is under no obligation to go back to them.

Israel needs to withdraw to its real borders.

Tell us please what you think those “ real Borders” are since you feel that the creation is Israel is “ occupation “.

Palestine's international borders were referenced in the 1949 UN Armistice Agreements. (that Israel signed)

You mean the borders that the Arabs did not recognize or respect?

No.

 

[rylah]

So now the
So the Armistice lines defined by the U.N. in 1949 really weren’t Borders? Good. That means the “ 67 Borders “ never existed so Israel is under no obligation to go back to them.

Israel needs to withdraw to its real borders.

Tell us please what you think those “ real Borders” are since you feel that the creation is Israel is “ occupation “.

Palestine's international borders were referenced in the 1949 UN Armistice Agreements. (that Israel signed)

You mean the borders that the Arabs did not recognize or respect?

No.

Arabs wanted a bigger Arab empire,
couldn't get just that one little bit.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Israel needs to withdraw to its real borders.

Tell us please what you think those “ real Borders” are since you feel that the creation is Israel is “ occupation “.

Palestine's international borders were referenced in the 1949 UN Armistice Agreements. (that Israel signed)

You mean the borders that the Arabs did not recognize or respect?

No.

Arabs wanted a bigger Arab empire,
couldn't get just that one little bit.

The Palestinian's 1948 declaration of independence was only within its own international borders. They didn't call for any extra.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Tell us please what you think those “ real Borders” are since you feel that the creation is Israel is “ occupation “.

Palestine's international borders were referenced in the 1949 UN Armistice Agreements. (that Israel signed)

You mean the borders that the Arabs did not recognize or respect?

No.

Arabs wanted a bigger Arab empire,
couldn't get just that one little bit.

The Palestinian's 1948 declaration of independence was only within its own international borders. They didn't call for any extra.

The Palestinian's 1948 declaration of independence was only within its own international borders.

The Jewish 1948 declaration of independence.

 

[Shusha]

The Palestinian's 1948 declaration of independence was only within its own international borders. They didn't call for any extra.

Yep. The Jewish Palestinian's 1948 declaration of independence was only within its own international borders. They didn't call for any extra. Those borders have been confirmed by many treaties over the years. The secession of a new sovereign state within those borders, and the subsequent creation of new borders can only come about as a result of negotiation and treaty between the Parties involved.

 

[P F Tinmore]

The Palestinian's 1948 declaration of independence was only within its own international borders. They didn't call for any extra.

Yep. The Jewish Palestinian's 1948 declaration of independence was only within its own international borders. They didn't call for any extra. Those borders have been confirmed by many treaties over the years. The secession of a new sovereign state within those borders, and the subsequent creation of new borders can only come about as a result of negotiation and treaty between the Parties involved.

Unsubstantiated Israeli talking points.

 

[USAF 2023]

The Palestinian's 1948 declaration of independence was only within its own international borders. They didn't call for any extra.

Yep. The Jewish Palestinian's 1948 declaration of independence was only within its own international borders. They didn't call for any extra. Those borders have been confirmed by many treaties over the years. The secession of a new sovereign state within those borders, and the subsequent creation of new borders can only come about as a result of negotiation and treaty between the Parties involved.

Unsubstantiated Israeli talking points.

Borders that were never recognized by the Arabs.

 

[USAF 2023]

The Palestinian's 1948 declaration of independence was only within its own international borders. They didn't call for any extra.

Yep. The Jewish Palestinian's 1948 declaration of independence was only within its own international borders. They didn't call for any extra. Those borders have been confirmed by many treaties over the years. The secession of a new sovereign state within those borders, and the subsequent creation of new borders can only come about as a result of negotiation and treaty between the Parties involved.

Have a question ( Tried to research it but couldn’t find anything definitive. What is the difference between the “48 border” and the “ 67 Borders?”

 

[Shusha]

The Palestinian's 1948 declaration of independence was only within its own international borders. They didn't call for any extra.

Yep. The Jewish Palestinian's 1948 declaration of independence was only within its own international borders. They didn't call for any extra. Those borders have been confirmed by many treaties over the years. The secession of a new sovereign state within those borders, and the subsequent creation of new borders can only come about as a result of negotiation and treaty between the Parties involved.

Unsubstantiated Israeli talking points.

Lol. I literally copied your exact words. When Team P says something, its fact(TM) and to be taken as gospel, yet when Team I says the same thing, its an "unsubstantiated Israeli talking point". Your double standards are astonishing.

 

[Shusha]

The Palestinian's 1948 declaration of independence was only within its own international borders. They didn't call for any extra.

Yep. The Jewish Palestinian's 1948 declaration of independence was only within its own international borders. They didn't call for any extra. Those borders have been confirmed by many treaties over the years. The secession of a new sovereign state within those borders, and the subsequent creation of new borders can only come about as a result of negotiation and treaty between the Parties involved.

Have a question ( Tried to research it but couldn’t find anything definitive. What is the difference between the “48 border” and the “ 67 Borders?”

Well, neither are "borders" in point of fact. The difference is whether one rejects Israeli (Jewish) sovereignty and presence over ALL of the territory or only over SOME of the territory. Its definitely swung in the direction of the "'48 borders" in the past dozen years or so and many who claim to be '67ers are really '48ers if you scratch the surface. That is part of the reason for the new Basic Law in Israel -- to counter the '48er demands to dismantle Israel. Get over it. Never going to happen.

 

[USAF 2023]

We hear so much about the “ 67 Borders” If they don’t exist Israeli doesn’t have to return to

We hear so much about the “ 67 Borders” If they don’t exist Israeli doesn’t have to return to them

Indeed, the armistice lines merely defined areas of occupation.

So now the

We hear so much about the “ 67 Borders” If they don’t exist Israeli doesn’t have to return to them

Indeed, the armistice lines merely defined areas of occupation.

So the Armistice lines defined by the U.N. in 1949 really weren’t Borders? Good. That means the “ 67 Borders “ never existed so Israel is under no obligation to go back to them.

Israel needs to withdraw to its real borders.

Tell us please what you think those “ real Borders” are since you feel that the creation is Israel is “ occupation “.

Palestine's international borders were referenced in the 1949 UN Armistice Agreements. (that Israel signed)

Tell us please why the Palestinians are entitled to any land within those borders linking Gaza to the W. Bank. If that was part of the 49th Armistice Agreement provide the

 

[Shusha]

Palestine's international borders were referenced in the 1949 UN Armistice Agreements. (that Israel signed)

And WHY did Israel sign them? Because Israel was the sovereign over the territory in question. She had the right, the control and the capacity to sign them. Israel, Jordan and Egypt were the ONLY local sovereigns who had the capacity and right to sign them.

 

[USAF 2023]

We hear so much about the “ 67 Borders” If they don’t exist Israeli doesn’t have to return to

We hear so much about the “ 67 Borders” If they don’t exist Israeli doesn’t have to return to them

Indeed, the armistice lines merely defined areas of occupation.

So now the

We hear so much about the “ 67 Borders” If they don’t exist Israeli doesn’t have to return to them

Indeed, the armistice lines merely defined areas of occupation.

So the Armistice lines defined by the U.N. in 1949 really weren’t Borders? Good. That means the “ 67 Borders “ never existed so Israel is under no obligation to go back to them.

Israel needs to withdraw to its real borders.

Tell us please what you think those “ real Borders” are since you feel that the creation is Israel is “ occupation “.

Palestine's international borders were referenced in the 1949 UN Armistice Agreements. (that Israel signed)

Since you are so big on the Armistice Agreement on April 3 1949 Article 7 stated that The Israelis had the rights to their Holy Sites which Jordan did not comply with. My guess is that you see nothing wrong with it. Israel complained to the U.N. !!! but nothing was done. That will never happen again.

 

[P F Tinmore]

Indeed, the armistice lines merely defined areas of occupation.

So now the

Indeed, the armistice lines merely defined areas of occupation.

So the Armistice lines defined by the U.N. in 1949 really weren’t Borders? Good. That means the “ 67 Borders “ never existed so Israel is under no obligation to go back to them.

Israel needs to withdraw to its real borders.

Tell us please what you think those “ real Borders” are since you feel that the creation is Israel is “ occupation “.

Palestine's international borders were referenced in the 1949 UN Armistice Agreements. (that Israel signed)

Since you are so big on the Armistice Agreement on April 3 1949 Article 7 stated that The Israelis had the rights to their Holy Sites which Jordan did not comply with. My guess is that you see nothing wrong with it. Israel complained to the U.N. !!! but nothing was done. That will never happen again.

That's Jordan. The Palestinians had nothing to do with that.