Dissent
Rookie
- Thread starter
- Banned
- #41
"Voluntarily". That's the key. Suppose someone doesn't want to live under your society, but doesn't want to move?What you think is immaterial.
People will do what they want. Some are bound by agree-upon sets of rules; some are not. Others seek to force their rules upon others -- "for their own good", of course. Some people seek to lead -- your system precludes that.
Ever read Animal Farm? That's how it would end up.
Yes animal farm is an awesome book. The whole point is people living together and doing things voluntarily. No force involved. If something does happen you have the right to defend your property/life with force. At least in a Anarcho Capitalist society.
You're going to force him -- either to live in your society, or to move.
And that violates the intent of your society. Pretty soon, you've got a small group making decisions for everyone, and then you're no better off than the society you condemn.
And that's why I say anarchism can work only in small, simple societies.
He would be left to be as long as he didn't harm anyone else or their property. Not going to force anyone to do anything. People that don't want to live in our society will weed themselves out on their own.