ABC News: Is Having a Loving Family an Unfair Advantage?

Good Gawd, you cannot make this stupid shit up!

So the solution to unequal upbringing between kids from loving homes and kids from dysfunctional families is to attack/question whether loving homes are 'fair'?

We need to replace the Literati elites that run this country and put in people that reflect the BEST values of the American people.

No Cookies | Daily Telegraph

“Is having a loving family an unfair advantage?” asks a story on the ABC’s website.

“Should parents snuggling up for one last story before lights out be even a little concerned about the advantage they might be conferring?”

The story was followed by a broadcast on the ABC’s Radio National that also tackled the apparently divisive issue of bedtime reading.

Evidence shows that the difference between those who get bedtime stories and those who don’t — the difference in their life chances — is bigger than the difference between those who get elite private schooling and those that don’t,” British academic Adam Swift told ABC presenter Joe Gelonesi.

Gelonesi responded online: “This devilish twist of evidence surely leads to a further conclusion that perhaps — in the interests of levelling the playing field — bedtime stories should also be restricted.”​
A perfect example....Obama came from a broken home......Bill Clinton.....came from a broken home.
So did Moses..
Nope. Not a good example. Moses found out who his parents were when he was an adult. He was raised properly up until then by a loving mother and surrogate father. The actual son of Pharaoh was a little shit.
 
There is a big different between Mothers and Fathers. Mothers consual and comfort a kid and is a more gental parent. Fathers tend to fix stuff and make things right. This mostly while y ou are growing up and both change as you get older. The problem is they lie a lot. The list is long. The Tooth fairy, The Boggy man, the sand man, Easter Bunny, Jack Frost Cupid, ghost, The fat guy in the Red suit, so the story is you are born let the lying begin.:boohoo:
 
The left is creating a foundation to justify removing a child from the family to equalize the education. See Cuba. It's policy in Cuba.
 
Good Gawd, you cannot make this stupid shit up!

So the solution to unequal upbringing between kids from loving homes and kids from dysfunctional families is to attack/question whether loving homes are 'fair'?

We need to replace the Literati elites that run this country and put in people that reflect the BEST values of the American people.

No Cookies | Daily Telegraph

“Is having a loving family an unfair advantage?” asks a story on the ABC’s website.

“Should parents snuggling up for one last story before lights out be even a little concerned about the advantage they might be conferring?”

The story was followed by a broadcast on the ABC’s Radio National that also tackled the apparently divisive issue of bedtime reading.

Evidence shows that the difference between those who get bedtime stories and those who don’t — the difference in their life chances — is bigger than the difference between those who get elite private schooling and those that don’t,” British academic Adam Swift told ABC presenter Joe Gelonesi.

Gelonesi responded online: “This devilish twist of evidence surely leads to a further conclusion that perhaps — in the interests of levelling the playing field — bedtime stories should also be restricted.”​
There was a time in the very recent past where this would have been stunning to me.

Now? No. This is just par for the course. It's where we are, it's where we're going.
.
 
Good Gawd, you cannot make this stupid shit up!

So the solution to unequal upbringing between kids from loving homes and kids from dysfunctional families is to attack/question whether loving homes are 'fair'?

We need to replace the Literati elites that run this country and put in people that reflect the BEST values of the American people.

No Cookies | Daily Telegraph

“Is having a loving family an unfair advantage?” asks a story on the ABC’s website.

“Should parents snuggling up for one last story before lights out be even a little concerned about the advantage they might be conferring?”

The story was followed by a broadcast on the ABC’s Radio National that also tackled the apparently divisive issue of bedtime reading.

Evidence shows that the difference between those who get bedtime stories and those who don’t — the difference in their life chances — is bigger than the difference between those who get elite private schooling and those that don’t,” British academic Adam Swift told ABC presenter Joe Gelonesi.

Gelonesi responded online: “This devilish twist of evidence surely leads to a further conclusion that perhaps — in the interests of levelling the playing field — bedtime stories should also be restricted.”​

Yep, this finally all makes total sense. So here is what needs to happen-

Once a child is born they are sent to live in a dormitory style environment. Their physical needs will be supplied by unemotional robots. All children will be nourished such that they will all grow to the same height and weight. All their hair will be cut and dyed the same. All test in school will be written so that the dumbest kid can get all the answers correct. Now that is FAIR, no advantage for the tall, good looking, smart kids with parents who raise and teach them better than a poor little slut who gets knocked up by some thug who won't be around.
 
Good Gawd, you cannot make this stupid shit up!

So the solution to unequal upbringing between kids from loving homes and kids from dysfunctional families is to attack/question whether loving homes are 'fair'?

We need to replace the Literati elites that run this country and put in people that reflect the BEST values of the American people.

No Cookies | Daily Telegraph

“Is having a loving family an unfair advantage?” asks a story on the ABC’s website.

“Should parents snuggling up for one last story before lights out be even a little concerned about the advantage they might be conferring?”

The story was followed by a broadcast on the ABC’s Radio National that also tackled the apparently divisive issue of bedtime reading.

Evidence shows that the difference between those who get bedtime stories and those who don’t — the difference in their life chances — is bigger than the difference between those who get elite private schooling and those that don’t,” British academic Adam Swift told ABC presenter Joe Gelonesi.

Gelonesi responded online: “This devilish twist of evidence surely leads to a further conclusion that perhaps — in the interests of levelling the playing field — bedtime stories should also be restricted.”​

Yep, this finally all makes total sense. So here is what needs to happen-

Once a child is born they are sent to live in a dormitory style environment. Their physical needs will be supplied by unemotional robots. All children will be nourished such that they will all grow to the same height and weight. All their hair will be cut and dyed the same. All test in school will be written so that the dumbest kid can get all the answers correct. Now that is FAIR, no advantage for the tall, good looking, smart kids with parents who raise and teach them better than a poor little slut who gets knocked up by some thug who won't be around.
You'd better make it clear that you're being sarcastic, otherwise you'll gain some fans here.
.
 
Good Gawd, you cannot make this stupid shit up!

So the solution to unequal upbringing between kids from loving homes and kids from dysfunctional families is to attack/question whether loving homes are 'fair'?

We need to replace the Literati elites that run this country and put in people that reflect the BEST values of the American people.

No Cookies | Daily Telegraph

“Is having a loving family an unfair advantage?” asks a story on the ABC’s website.

“Should parents snuggling up for one last story before lights out be even a little concerned about the advantage they might be conferring?”

The story was followed by a broadcast on the ABC’s Radio National that also tackled the apparently divisive issue of bedtime reading.

Evidence shows that the difference between those who get bedtime stories and those who don’t — the difference in their life chances — is bigger than the difference between those who get elite private schooling and those that don’t,” British academic Adam Swift told ABC presenter Joe Gelonesi.

Gelonesi responded online: “This devilish twist of evidence surely leads to a further conclusion that perhaps — in the interests of levelling the playing field — bedtime stories should also be restricted.”​

Yep, this finally all makes total sense. So here is what needs to happen-

Once a child is born they are sent to live in a dormitory style environment. Their physical needs will be supplied by unemotional robots. All children will be nourished such that they will all grow to the same height and weight. All their hair will be cut and dyed the same. All test in school will be written so that the dumbest kid can get all the answers correct. Now that is FAIR, no advantage for the tall, good looking, smart kids with parents who raise and teach them better than a poor little slut who gets knocked up by some thug who won't be around.
The Harrison Bergeron future.

Harrison Bergeron
 
Good Gawd, you cannot make this stupid shit up!

So the solution to unequal upbringing between kids from loving homes and kids from dysfunctional families is to attack/question whether loving homes are 'fair'?

We need to replace the Literati elites that run this country and put in people that reflect the BEST values of the American people.

No Cookies | Daily Telegraph

“Is having a loving family an unfair advantage?” asks a story on the ABC’s website.

“Should parents snuggling up for one last story before lights out be even a little concerned about the advantage they might be conferring?”

The story was followed by a broadcast on the ABC’s Radio National that also tackled the apparently divisive issue of bedtime reading.

Evidence shows that the difference between those who get bedtime stories and those who don’t — the difference in their life chances — is bigger than the difference between those who get elite private schooling and those that don’t,” British academic Adam Swift told ABC presenter Joe Gelonesi.

Gelonesi responded online: “This devilish twist of evidence surely leads to a further conclusion that perhaps — in the interests of levelling the playing field — bedtime stories should also be restricted.”​

Yep, this finally all makes total sense. So here is what needs to happen-

Once a child is born they are sent to live in a dormitory style environment. Their physical needs will be supplied by unemotional robots. All children will be nourished such that they will all grow to the same height and weight. All their hair will be cut and dyed the same. All test in school will be written so that the dumbest kid can get all the answers correct. Now that is FAIR, no advantage for the tall, good looking, smart kids with parents who raise and teach them better than a poor little slut who gets knocked up by some thug who won't be around.
The Harrison Bergeron future.

Harrison Bergeron

That is indeed illustrative of Democrat goals.
 
Good Gawd, you cannot make this stupid shit up!

So the solution to unequal upbringing between kids from loving homes and kids from dysfunctional families is to attack/question whether loving homes are 'fair'?

We need to replace the Literati elites that run this country and put in people that reflect the BEST values of the American people.

No Cookies | Daily Telegraph

“Is having a loving family an unfair advantage?” asks a story on the ABC’s website.

“Should parents snuggling up for one last story before lights out be even a little concerned about the advantage they might be conferring?”

The story was followed by a broadcast on the ABC’s Radio National that also tackled the apparently divisive issue of bedtime reading.

Evidence shows that the difference between those who get bedtime stories and those who don’t — the difference in their life chances — is bigger than the difference between those who get elite private schooling and those that don’t,” British academic Adam Swift told ABC presenter Joe Gelonesi.

Gelonesi responded online: “This devilish twist of evidence surely leads to a further conclusion that perhaps — in the interests of levelling the playing field — bedtime stories should also be restricted.”​

Yep, this finally all makes total sense. So here is what needs to happen-

Once a child is born they are sent to live in a dormitory style environment. Their physical needs will be supplied by unemotional robots. All children will be nourished such that they will all grow to the same height and weight. All their hair will be cut and dyed the same. All test in school will be written so that the dumbest kid can get all the answers correct. Now that is FAIR, no advantage for the tall, good looking, smart kids with parents who raise and teach them better than a poor little slut who gets knocked up by some thug who won't be around.
The Harrison Bergeron future.

Harrison Bergeron

That is indeed illustrative of Democrat goals.


I am a democrat and I love having a loving family! A truly loving family accepts you as you.
 
Good Gawd, you cannot make this stupid shit up!

So the solution to unequal upbringing between kids from loving homes and kids from dysfunctional families is to attack/question whether loving homes are 'fair'?

We need to replace the Literati elites that run this country and put in people that reflect the BEST values of the American people.

No Cookies | Daily Telegraph

“Is having a loving family an unfair advantage?” asks a story on the ABC’s website.

“Should parents snuggling up for one last story before lights out be even a little concerned about the advantage they might be conferring?”

The story was followed by a broadcast on the ABC’s Radio National that also tackled the apparently divisive issue of bedtime reading.

Evidence shows that the difference between those who get bedtime stories and those who don’t — the difference in their life chances — is bigger than the difference between those who get elite private schooling and those that don’t,” British academic Adam Swift told ABC presenter Joe Gelonesi.

Gelonesi responded online: “This devilish twist of evidence surely leads to a further conclusion that perhaps — in the interests of levelling the playing field — bedtime stories should also be restricted.”​

Yep, this finally all makes total sense. So here is what needs to happen-

Once a child is born they are sent to live in a dormitory style environment. Their physical needs will be supplied by unemotional robots. All children will be nourished such that they will all grow to the same height and weight. All their hair will be cut and dyed the same. All test in school will be written so that the dumbest kid can get all the answers correct. Now that is FAIR, no advantage for the tall, good looking, smart kids with parents who raise and teach them better than a poor little slut who gets knocked up by some thug who won't be around.
The Harrison Bergeron future.

Harrison Bergeron

That is indeed illustrative of Democrat goals.


I am a democrat and I love having a loving family! A truly loving family accepts you as you.

Irrelevant to the issues presented.
 
Good Gawd, you cannot make this stupid shit up!

So the solution to unequal upbringing between kids from loving homes and kids from dysfunctional families is to attack/question whether loving homes are 'fair'?

We need to replace the Literati elites that run this country and put in people that reflect the BEST values of the American people.

No Cookies | Daily Telegraph

“Is having a loving family an unfair advantage?” asks a story on the ABC’s website.

“Should parents snuggling up for one last story before lights out be even a little concerned about the advantage they might be conferring?”

The story was followed by a broadcast on the ABC’s Radio National that also tackled the apparently divisive issue of bedtime reading.

Evidence shows that the difference between those who get bedtime stories and those who don’t — the difference in their life chances — is bigger than the difference between those who get elite private schooling and those that don’t,” British academic Adam Swift told ABC presenter Joe Gelonesi.

Gelonesi responded online: “This devilish twist of evidence surely leads to a further conclusion that perhaps — in the interests of levelling the playing field — bedtime stories should also be restricted.”​

Yep, this finally all makes total sense. So here is what needs to happen-

Once a child is born they are sent to live in a dormitory style environment. Their physical needs will be supplied by unemotional robots. All children will be nourished such that they will all grow to the same height and weight. All their hair will be cut and dyed the same. All test in school will be written so that the dumbest kid can get all the answers correct. Now that is FAIR, no advantage for the tall, good looking, smart kids with parents who raise and teach them better than a poor little slut who gets knocked up by some thug who won't be around.
The Harrison Bergeron future.

Harrison Bergeron

That is indeed illustrative of Democrat goals.


I am a democrat and I love having a loving family! A truly loving family accepts you as you.

Irrelevant to the issues presented.

Hey Billy K, it's Matty. Relevance is not his strong suit, so just pat him on the head and thank him for his 'contribution'.
 
There is a big different between Mothers and Fathers. Mothers consual and comfort a kid and is a more gental parent. Fathers tend to fix stuff and make things right. This mostly while y ou are growing up and both change as you get older. The problem is they lie a lot. The list is long. The Tooth fairy, The Boggy man, the sand man, Easter Bunny, Jack Frost Cupid, ghost, The fat guy in the Red suit, so the story is you are born let the lying begin.:boohoo:


They are trying to do this here too, I believe Ca. might have done this but can't be sure ...

France set to ban words 'mother' and 'father' on official documents under plans to legalize gay marriage

France set to ban words 'mother' and 'father' on official documents under plans to legalize gay marriage
 
Good Gawd, you cannot make this stupid shit up!

So the solution to unequal upbringing between kids from loving homes and kids from dysfunctional families is to attack/question whether loving homes are 'fair'?

We need to replace the Literati elites that run this country and put in people that reflect the BEST values of the American people.

No Cookies | Daily Telegraph

“Is having a loving family an unfair advantage?” asks a story on the ABC’s website.

“Should parents snuggling up for one last story before lights out be even a little concerned about the advantage they might be conferring?”

The story was followed by a broadcast on the ABC’s Radio National that also tackled the apparently divisive issue of bedtime reading.

Evidence shows that the difference between those who get bedtime stories and those who don’t — the difference in their life chances — is bigger than the difference between those who get elite private schooling and those that don’t,” British academic Adam Swift told ABC presenter Joe Gelonesi.

Gelonesi responded online: “This devilish twist of evidence surely leads to a further conclusion that perhaps — in the interests of levelling the playing field — bedtime stories should also be restricted.”​

Yep, this finally all makes total sense. So here is what needs to happen-

Once a child is born they are sent to live in a dormitory style environment. Their physical needs will be supplied by unemotional robots. All children will be nourished such that they will all grow to the same height and weight. All their hair will be cut and dyed the same. All test in school will be written so that the dumbest kid can get all the answers correct. Now that is FAIR, no advantage for the tall, good looking, smart kids with parents who raise and teach them better than a poor little slut who gets knocked up by some thug who won't be around.

Remember the movie " SOLDIER" I think Kurt Russell was in it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top