A Sex Offender is a Sex Offender

[Lord Long Rod]

Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll.

Jury finds Trump liable for sexual abuse, awards accuser $5M

A jury has found Donald Trump liable for sexually abusing advice columnist E. Jean Carroll in 1996. Jurors awarded her $5 million in a judgment that could haunt the former president as he campaigns to regain the White House. The verdict was announced in a federal courtroom in New York City on...

apnews.com

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/07/19/trump-carroll-judge-rape/

Wrong

 

[Lord Long Rod]

progressive hunter You can refuse to accept reality all you want. MAGA cult members are known for that, but the judge made a special public announcement to clear up any question of whether trump raped that woman.

You ought to just copy and paste your responses, Bullfrog. They are all the same.

 

[progressive hunter]

Says Donald, AKA "Dom Don", who just recently said herein that pedophilia is simply a "sexual preference".

its a sexual preference that requires a woodchipper to correct,,

 

[Donald H]

Says Donald, AKA "Dom Don", who just recently said herein that pedophilia is simply a "sexual preference".

You'll never be released from your dilemma if you keep that up Rod.

 

[progressive hunter]

You'll never be released from your dilemma if you keep that up Rod.

its off to the woodchipper if they dont see the error of their pedophile ways,,

 

[Lord Long Rod]

You'll never be released from your dilemma if you keep that up Rod.

Weird deflection, pervo.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

You can whitewash it all day long but it's still true. A lot like calling pedophiles Minor Attracted Persons.

Washington state Democrats propose replacing term 'sex offender' to advance a 'person-first' approach

Washington state Democrats propose replacing term 'sex offender' to advance a 'person-first' approach

Washington state Democrats introduced a bill that would change the term "sex offender" in the Sex Offender Policy Board and add a convicted sex offender to the board.

www.foxnews.com

An American jury found Donald Trump guilty of sexual abuse. Will this help him?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

I can't read the article so I don't know for sure, but what if somebody was only accused of being a sex offender and not actually convicted? I mean there's a pretty big difference there.

You mean like Joe Biden only accused of something that Donald Trump was found to be guilty of?

 

[BackAgain]

An American jury found Donald Trump guilty of sexual abuse.

False, the Dainty.

It was a civil trial. So by simple and undeniable definition, they couldn’t have found Trump “guilty” of anything.

They did find him liable for defaming poor little E. Jean Carroll over her claim that he had “raped” her.

Imagine denying a false claim. Shocking.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

False, the Dainty.

You t was a civil trial. So by simple and undeniable definition, they couldn’t have found Trump “guilty” of anything.

They did find him liable for defaming poor little E. Jean Carroll over her claim that he had “raped” her.

Imagine denying a false claim. Shocking.

They found him liable for sexual abuse. The law says he's a sex abuser.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

False, the Dainty.

It was a civil trial. So by simple and undeniable definition, they couldn’t have found Trump “guilty” of anything.

They did find him liable for defaming poor little E. Jean Carroll over her claim that he had “raped” her.

Imagine denying a false claim. Shocking.

FACTS MATTER:

"Because a different jury found last year that Trump sexually abused Carroll, U.S. District Judge Judge Lewis A. Kaplan has ruled that if the former president takes the stand now, he won't be allowed to say she concocted her allegation or that she was motivated by financial or political considerations."

Trump may take the witness stand in sex abuse defamation trial

A different jury found last year that former President Donald Trump sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll. U.S. District Judge Judge Lewis A. Kaplan has ruled that if Trump takes the stand now, he won't be allowed to say she concocted her allegation or that she was motivated by financial or...

www.pbs.org

 

[BackAgain]

They found him liable for sexual abuse. The law says he's a sex abuser.

Nope. You’re wrong again, the Dainty. That would require a criminal conviction.

That has never happened.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Nope. You’re wrong again, the Dainty. That would require a criminal conviction.

That has never happened.

again...

"Trump doesn’t have to attend or give testimony in the civil case. He stayed away last year from the prior trial, where a different jury awarded Carroll $5 million after deciding that Trump sexually abused her in 1996 and made defamatory comments about her in 2022. Trump is appealing that verdict."

"Because a different jury found last year that Trump sexually abused Carroll, U.S. District Judge Judge Lewis A. Kaplan has ruled that if the former president takes the stand now, he won’t be allowed to say she concocted her allegation or that she was motivated by financial or political considerations."

 

[BackAgain]

FACTS MATTER:

"Because a different jury found last year that Trump sexually abused Carroll, U.S. District Judge Judge Lewis A. Kaplan has ruled that if the former president takes the stand now, he won't be allowed to say she concocted her allegation or that she was motivated by financial or political considerations."

Trump may take the witness stand in sex abuse defamation trial

A different jury found last year that former President Donald Trump sexually abused writer E. Jean Carroll. U.S. District Judge Judge Lewis A. Kaplan has ruled that if Trump takes the stand now, he won't be allowed to say she concocted her allegation or that she was motivated by financial or...

www.pbs.org

A poor ruling. A civil jury saying something only matters in that trial. It doesn’t apply to any other matter.

Therefore what the Judge is claiming is his interpretation of res judicata. It might even get reversed on appeal.

But, in any event, one thing the prior verdict didn’t do (and couldn’t do) is to validly label Trump as a sexual abuser n any context outside the context of that case.

 

[BackAgain]

again...

"Trump doesn’t have to attend or give testimony in the civil case. He stayed away last year from the prior trial, where a different jury awarded Carroll $5 million after deciding that Trump sexually abused her in 1996 and made defamatory comments about her in 2022. Trump is appealing that verdict."

"Because a different jury found last year that Trump sexually abused Carroll, U.S. District Judge Judge Lewis A. Kaplan has ruled that if the former president takes the stand now, he won’t be allowed to say she concocted her allegation or that she was motivated by financial or political considerations."

You persist in missing the point.

Res Judicata doesn’t mean what you stretch it to try to cover.

Your fail is ongoing, the dainty.

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

A poor ruling. A civil jury saying something only matters in that trial. It doesn’t apply to any other matter.

Therefore what the Judge is claiming is his interpretation of res judicata. It might even get reversed on appeal.

But, in any event, one thing the prior verdict didn’t do (and couldn’t do) is to validly label Trump as a sexual abuser n any context outside the context of that case.

And Aliens might land in your back yard.

We all know he stuck his fingers in her vagina against her will.

President Trump said he had no idea who she was.

 

[BackAgain]

And Aliens might land in your back yard.

We all know he stuck his fingers in her vagina against her will.

Nah. We don’t all know any such thing.

You choose to believe it. I’m doubt any such thing ever happened. Most intelligent people (which excludes you, the dainty) recognize that her claims were patently absurd.

President Trump said he had no idea who she was.

So?

 

[Procrustes Stretched]

Nah. We don’t all know any such thing.

You choose to believe it. I’m doubt any such thing ever happened. Most intelligent people (which excludes you, the dainty) recognize that her claims were patently absurd.

So?

We all know what was presented in court.

Trump stuck his fingers in that woman's vagina -- against her will.

 

[BackAgain]

We all know what was presented in court.

Her absurd claims.

Trump stuck his fingers in that woman's vagina -- against her will.

Nah. Never happened.

The dainty, you just want to believe it.

But to do so, you have to accept her say so. And she contradicted herself time and time again.

 

[Seymour Flops]

In fact, all sex offenders aren't the same. But good that you bring it up!

Your assertion is tuned well to the political divide in America. It's as wrong as saying that all abortions should be against the law.

But both are extremist positions that the left can oppose and the right can promote.

In a normal political situation in another country, the two sides work toward compromise, and eventually it's inevitable they will succeed.

Americans might start another civil war over the issue, and other similar issues.

Can you give us the arguments on the other side of this issue from the pro-sex offender viewpoint?