A Question

Discussion in 'History' started by Unkotare, Aug 10, 2012.

  1. Unkotare
    Offline

    Unkotare Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    68,682
    Thanks Received:
    5,363
    Trophy Points:
    1,815
    Ratings:
    +15,178
  2. mememe
    Offline

    mememe BANNED

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2009
    Messages:
    1,363
    Thanks Received:
    53
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +53
    Yes!
     
  3. whitehall
    Offline

    whitehall Platinum Member

    Joined:
    Dec 28, 2010
    Messages:
    32,183
    Thanks Received:
    5,317
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    Western Va.
    Ratings:
    +16,017
    Mass killing of civilians to force the surrender of a crazy regime might seem crazy today but in retrospect it seems to be an accepted concept as long as you were on the winning side.
     
  4. Mr. H.
    Offline

    Mr. H. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    44,173
    Thanks Received:
    9,278
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    A warm place with no memory.
    Ratings:
    +15,484
    If the A-bombs hadn't been used back then, demonstrating their truly destructive power and ability to annihilate, they would more likely be used today. It was a one-off of sorts.

    Conventional bombings during WWII were no less of a "war crime".

    Nope. They asked for it, they got it.
     
  5. Unkotare
    Offline

    Unkotare Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    68,682
    Thanks Received:
    5,363
    Trophy Points:
    1,815
    Ratings:
    +15,178
    It was war alright. A bitter, hard-fought war. But did those many, many tens of thousands of civilians "ask for it"? It's a fair question no matter where you stand on the decision.
     
  6. Mr. H.
    Offline

    Mr. H. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    44,173
    Thanks Received:
    9,278
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    A warm place with no memory.
    Ratings:
    +15,484
    Litterally, no. As citizens ruled by their leader, yes.
     
  7. Unkotare
    Offline

    Unkotare Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 16, 2011
    Messages:
    68,682
    Thanks Received:
    5,363
    Trophy Points:
    1,815
    Ratings:
    +15,178
    So, the systematic execution of every civilian in the country would have been ok with you (if such a thing were pracitcally possible).
     
  8. Mr. H.
    Offline

    Mr. H. Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2009
    Messages:
    44,173
    Thanks Received:
    9,278
    Trophy Points:
    2,030
    Location:
    A warm place with no memory.
    Ratings:
    +15,484
    That wasn't the intent nor the objective of dropping those big badda bombs.
     
  9. PoliticalChic
    Online

    PoliticalChic Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 6, 2008
    Messages:
    66,520
    Thanks Received:
    19,952
    Trophy Points:
    2,260
    Location:
    Brooklyn, NY
    Ratings:
    +37,197
    Without the dropping of the bomb, the emperor and the 'peace faction' would not have been able to overcome the military's government strength, and negotiate an end to the war.



    [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U2AhV-QU1_M]Prager University: Hiroshima -- Why America Dropped the Bomb - YouTube[/ame]
     
  10. mememe
    Offline

    mememe BANNED

    Joined:
    Jun 12, 2009
    Messages:
    1,363
    Thanks Received:
    53
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +53
    So, mass murder of civilians by Nazis is an "accepted concept"? And if Nazi would've won, you would see nothing wrong with their mass murder and genocide policies?

    Interesting...
     
    Last edited: Aug 11, 2012

Share This Page