A non partisan view of the healthcare bill...

Discussion in 'Healthcare/Insurance/Govt Healthcare' started by California Girl, Mar 27, 2010.

  1. California Girl
    Offline

    California Girl BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    50,337
    Thanks Received:
    8,960
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +8,965
    Most of you know how I am loathed to use the media as a 'source', but this is an interesting article.... unfortunately, most of you will be unable to whine about 'the other side', so I suspect you won't even bother to read it. But.... for what it is worth....

    Health reform in America: Signed, sealed, delivered | The Economist

    Since writers for the Economist write pure on fact, and leave politics aside, I find the article a really good one. The left may not like the very clear little chart though.

    I like this part....

    What will it mean for America? The short answer is that the reforms will expand coverage dramatically, but at a heavy cost to the taxpayer. They will also do far too little to rein in the underlying drivers of America’s roaring health inflation. Analysis by RAND, an independent think-tank, suggests that the reforms will actually increase America’s overall health spending—public plus private—by about 2% by 2020, in comparison with a scenario of no reform (see chart). And that rate of spending was already unsustainable at a time when the baby-boomers are starting to retire in large numbers.

    And the end....

    Paul Krugman, an economics professor at Princeton and a liberal booster of reform, wrote on the eve of the votes: “There is, as always, a tunnel at the end of the tunnel: we’ll spend years if not decades fixing this thing.” Robert Moffit of the Heritage Foundation, a conservative think-tank opposed to the effort, agrees, albeit in darker terms: “This marks the beginning of the next phase of this hundred years war.”
     
    Last edited: Mar 27, 2010
  2. L.K.Eder
    Offline

    L.K.Eder unbannable non-troll

    Joined:
    May 29, 2009
    Messages:
    20,366
    Thanks Received:
    3,615
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    theartching thapphireth
    Ratings:
    +6,841
    i am among those who know you are loathed and am not loath to mention that.
     
  3. California Girl
    Offline

    California Girl BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    50,337
    Thanks Received:
    8,960
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +8,965
    Ahhhh, the Alinsky tactic already! Wow.

    It ain't a popularity contest, little man. How pathetic of you to try and make it one.
     
  4. L.K.Eder
    Offline

    L.K.Eder unbannable non-troll

    Joined:
    May 29, 2009
    Messages:
    20,366
    Thanks Received:
    3,615
    Trophy Points:
    280
    Location:
    theartching thapphireth
    Ratings:
    +6,841

    alinsky was a grammar nazi? are you sure you are a writer?
     
  5. California Girl
    Offline

    California Girl BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    50,337
    Thanks Received:
    8,960
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +8,965
    Nothing to say on the actual topic? How surprising! Color me shocked pink! It must be frustrating for you, midget.
     
  6. JW Frogen
    Offline

    JW Frogen Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2009
    Messages:
    6,165
    Thanks Received:
    1,167
    Trophy Points:
    153
    Ratings:
    +1,206
    Strange you should mention that, I had a very pleasant dream last night on just that subject.
     
  7. editec
    Offline

    editec Mr. Forgot-it-All

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    41,427
    Thanks Received:
    5,598
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +5,618
    Appears to me that the Krugman's complaints about this plan and mine are very similar.


    That is a good thing, of course.

    Now the blowback is that they will also have every right, and every logical argument for petitioning the government to allow them to increase premiums to offset these new much more costly clients.

    Insurance companies will NOT lose profits because of these new clients.

    In fact, they will make even more profits as a result of having to cover these people.

    But EVERYBODY's premiums must go up to cover these new expenses, folks. Everybody's


    Yes. And since HC insurance profits are set to be a percentage overall primiums, they will make a LOT more money, too wwon't they?

    Because when they go to the government for rate increase, they WILL get what they ask for.

    Because if they do not, then those insruance companies will go out of business...and the government cannot allow that, because then nobody has HC insurance.

    See how that works?

    This is why I hqave been saying for the last few months, that I could not POSSIBLY have written a plan that served the interests of HC insurance cmpanies better than this does.




    Shop for what? This is virtually a monompoly, pretending to be a competitive system.

    Remember everybody HAS to BUY somebody's insurance.

    And all insurance rates are decided by the government.

    And the government will NOT put any insurance company OOB.

    You'll have a choice, alright... a choice between twiddle dee and tewidle dumb, both of whom offer the same thing, priced by the government.



    Tranparent pricing? What a nice soundbyte. It's completely meaningless, but it has a SOUNDS GOOD ring to it, doesn't it?

    Of course it's TRANSPARENT...the government oversees the cost of premiums.

    We have NOT solved the HC problem, folks.

    We have merely changed to some extent who has to pay for it.

    And who is now going to pay for it who once did not?

    Those of us who did not have HC, before, that's who.

    And of course...the TAXPAYERS.

    At least that's how this Indie sees it.

    Oh yeah...one more thing for you to chew over...

    We're dramatically increasing the DEMAND chasing HC, right?

    Have we dramatically INCREASED the SUPPLY of HC?

    No?

    Well, budding economists...what happens to prices when MORE MONEY CHASES THE SAME AMOUNT OF GOODS IN A MARKET?

    1. the price goes up
    2. the price goes down
    3. the price stays the same​

    You guys with degrees in engineers and science and business can do the math.​

    I'm just a foolish social scientist and as you all know, we're all too dumb to work with numbers.​
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 3
    Last edited: Mar 27, 2010
  8. mudwhistle
    Offline

    mudwhistle Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Messages:
    65,320
    Thanks Received:
    11,939
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Wetwang With Fimber, Yorkshire
    Ratings:
    +26,265
    We hate what we don't understand.
     
  9. mudwhistle
    Offline

    mudwhistle Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2009
    Messages:
    65,320
    Thanks Received:
    11,939
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Wetwang With Fimber, Yorkshire
    Ratings:
    +26,265
    Funny that you would know so much about the asshole to be able to say something like that.

    I think you just dropped your trousers bud.
     
  10. California Girl
    Offline

    California Girl BANNED

    Joined:
    Oct 8, 2009
    Messages:
    50,337
    Thanks Received:
    8,960
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +8,965
    It must be hard for those who struggle to understand the article to comment on it, so attacking the poster is the natural fall back position. Sad, huh?
     

Share This Page

Search tags for this page

non partisan opinion of health care bill