Trading five of the most barbarous Gitmo detainees for one soldier of questionable character ties into the attack in Benghazi. Bear with me on this.
Ill begin with this video:
The media is making a big deal out of Barack Taqiyya not notifying Congress before releasing enemy combatants. That is pure Bullcrap with a capital B because it does not threaten Taqiyya the Liar in any meaningful way. He breaks the law with impunity and nothing is done. Another meaningless charge of criminal conduct does make Congress and the media look like they are on the ball. Judge Napolitano isnt buying it (my emphasis):
Megyn Kelly was not happy with the federal statue Napolitano hung around Taqiyyas neck as her final comment in the video showed:
Unless Kelly can demonstrate Taqiyyas intent is as pure as the driven snow she should NOT spring to his defence so qickly, or at least provide a full debate on the law Judge Napolitano was referencing so the audience can decide for itself.
In 2008, Taqiyya began promising to close Guantanamo. Megyn Kelly can start looking for intent in this video:
Closing Gitmo was one of Taqiyyas sick attempts to establish himself as the nations spiritual leader. In case you missed it he made no moral demands on Islam, nor has he ever demanded moral accountability from the Religion of Peace. Indeed, he implied that rough interrogation techniques are worse than the butchery Muslims engage in routinely.
Also, I am not aware that captured enemy combatants are entitled to habeas corpus. I am aware that his broad universal principles means the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Those are the Rights that Muslim countries ignore.
In addition to giving the enemy a helping hand by releasing those five specific prisoners, Taqiyya is keeping his promise to close Gitmo irrespective of the law. It is too bad that he is not as committed to honoring the promises he made about keeping your doctor and your heath insurance.
(Hang in there. Im coming to Benghazi.)
Prisoner of war
The White House sent an idiot, Chuck Hagel, and a liar, Suzy Five Shows, to last Sundays talk shows to justify the 5 for 1 swap. They labeled Bowe Bergdahl a prisoner of war in order to make the exchange standard operating procedure; so it is fair to say the five Muslims were our prisoners of war. I could be wrong. This Administration is so goofy they might mean that Bergdahl was a prisoner of war while our 5 Muslims were ordinary criminals. Why is that important? Answer: Enemy combatants from Gitmo were tried in a federal court with the full protection of the US Constitution before the worst of them were released?
Now comes the Benghazi tie-in
Taqiyya the Liar continues to promise:
The fact is: Capturing and punishing the Muslims who killed our people in Benghazi is the last thing Taqiyya the Liar wants. After promising to capture and punish the attackers was put out there by the White House somebody must have asked: What are we going to with them if we do capture them? They could not put them in Gitmo because they were in the process of shutting it down.
At some point they had to realize they could not try the Benghazi attackers in a military court because that would have been an admission that the homemade video story was an absolute lie, a lie they are still denying.
They could not try the Benghazi attackers as criminals in a federal court because it was sure to come out that the attack was a well-planned military operation.
Bottom line: Nobody is looking for the attackers.
My point: Defining the Bergdahl swap as a prisoner of war exchange strengthens the Select Committees hand in a way that the White House did not see coming. The question of who issued the order to stand down is now undeniably a case of military versus military rather than our military verses a ragtag spontaneous demonstration. Everybody who has been following the coverup knows that it was always military versus military. The PRISONER OF WAR exchange sets it in cement. There is no reason to waste time inquiring about a homemade video nobody saw.
Finally, Americans quickly grasped the possibility of a real Manchurian candidate, while they cannot come to grips with a Mecca candidate. The only explanation I can offer for that anomaly is that a fictional Manchurian candidate had to be brainwashed while Barack Taqiyya is a true believer in every sense as defined by Eric Hoffer in his masterpiece The True Believer:
Ill begin with this video:
The media is making a big deal out of Barack Taqiyya not notifying Congress before releasing enemy combatants. That is pure Bullcrap with a capital B because it does not threaten Taqiyya the Liar in any meaningful way. He breaks the law with impunity and nothing is done. Another meaningless charge of criminal conduct does make Congress and the media look like they are on the ball. Judge Napolitano isnt buying it (my emphasis):
Megyn Kelly was not happy with the federal statue Napolitano hung around Taqiyyas neck as her final comment in the video showed:
Unless Kelly can demonstrate Taqiyyas intent is as pure as the driven snow she should NOT spring to his defence so qickly, or at least provide a full debate on the law Judge Napolitano was referencing so the audience can decide for itself.
In 2008, Taqiyya began promising to close Guantanamo. Megyn Kelly can start looking for intent in this video:
[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=8USRg3h4AdE]Obama's Promise to immediately close Guantanamo - YouTube[/ame]
Closing Gitmo was one of Taqiyyas sick attempts to establish himself as the nations spiritual leader. In case you missed it he made no moral demands on Islam, nor has he ever demanded moral accountability from the Religion of Peace. Indeed, he implied that rough interrogation techniques are worse than the butchery Muslims engage in routinely.
Also, I am not aware that captured enemy combatants are entitled to habeas corpus. I am aware that his broad universal principles means the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Those are the Rights that Muslim countries ignore.
In addition to giving the enemy a helping hand by releasing those five specific prisoners, Taqiyya is keeping his promise to close Gitmo irrespective of the law. It is too bad that he is not as committed to honoring the promises he made about keeping your doctor and your heath insurance.
(Hang in there. Im coming to Benghazi.)
Prisoner of war
The White House sent an idiot, Chuck Hagel, and a liar, Suzy Five Shows, to last Sundays talk shows to justify the 5 for 1 swap. They labeled Bowe Bergdahl a prisoner of war in order to make the exchange standard operating procedure; so it is fair to say the five Muslims were our prisoners of war. I could be wrong. This Administration is so goofy they might mean that Bergdahl was a prisoner of war while our 5 Muslims were ordinary criminals. Why is that important? Answer: Enemy combatants from Gitmo were tried in a federal court with the full protection of the US Constitution before the worst of them were released?
Now comes the Benghazi tie-in
Taqiyya the Liar continues to promise:
The fact is: Capturing and punishing the Muslims who killed our people in Benghazi is the last thing Taqiyya the Liar wants. After promising to capture and punish the attackers was put out there by the White House somebody must have asked: What are we going to with them if we do capture them? They could not put them in Gitmo because they were in the process of shutting it down.
At some point they had to realize they could not try the Benghazi attackers in a military court because that would have been an admission that the homemade video story was an absolute lie, a lie they are still denying.
They could not try the Benghazi attackers as criminals in a federal court because it was sure to come out that the attack was a well-planned military operation.
Bottom line: Nobody is looking for the attackers.
My point: Defining the Bergdahl swap as a prisoner of war exchange strengthens the Select Committees hand in a way that the White House did not see coming. The question of who issued the order to stand down is now undeniably a case of military versus military rather than our military verses a ragtag spontaneous demonstration. Everybody who has been following the coverup knows that it was always military versus military. The PRISONER OF WAR exchange sets it in cement. There is no reason to waste time inquiring about a homemade video nobody saw.
Finally, Americans quickly grasped the possibility of a real Manchurian candidate, while they cannot come to grips with a Mecca candidate. The only explanation I can offer for that anomaly is that a fictional Manchurian candidate had to be brainwashed while Barack Taqiyya is a true believer in every sense as defined by Eric Hoffer in his masterpiece The True Believer:
