A Fundamental Warmer Prediction Comes True

Crick

Gold Member
May 10, 2014
27,873
5,290
290
N/A

1708087694102.png


And another fundamental warmer prediction come true

1708087804123.png

 
All normal responses for an interglacial period that is still warming up to its preglacial temperature like it has always done before plunging into the next glacial period.

glacial cycles.png
 

View attachment 903209

And another fundamental warmer prediction come true

View attachment 903210

Moana Loa reading during the Covid shutdown PROVES mankind has no impact on CO2
 
All normal responses for an interglacial period that is still warming up to its preglacial temperature like it has always done before plunging into the next glacial period.

View attachment 903238
No, you idiot!....The only temperature records that count are those taken since the beginning of the industrial revolution, and are predominantly observed in urban heat islands!

/sarc
 
No, you idiot!....The only temperature records that count are those taken since the beginning of the industrial revolution, and are predominantly observed in urban heat islands!

/sarc
What the hell was I thinking!!!
 
All normal responses for an interglacial period that is still warming up to its preglacial temperature like it has always done before plunging into the next glacial period.

View attachment 903238
Does that have something to do with a prediction by mainstream science?

And if you think the current pattern of CO2 and warming resembles any prior glacial-interglacial transition, you're just fucking stupid. Please recall that the planet was COOLING for 6,000 years before the Industrial Revolution and that the most rapid interglacial warming and CO2 rise took place at a tiny fraction of the rate at which we are warming now. These are the points that make you look stupid. Try addressing them.
 
Does that have something to do with a prediction by mainstream science?

And if you think the current pattern of CO2 and warming resembles any prior glacial-interglacial transition, you're just fucking stupid. Please recall that the planet was COOLING for 6,000 years before the Industrial Revolution and that the most rapid interglacial warming and CO2 rise took place at a tiny fraction of the rate at which we are warming now. These are the points that make you look stupid. Try addressing them.
Ooooo....Your "mainstream science" swerved into a prediction that came to pass!...Pop the champagne!

Mario Mendoza still has a better batting average.
 
Ooooo....Your "mainstream science" swerved into a prediction that came to pass!...Pop the champagne!

Mario Mendoza still has a better batting average.
Who has the good batting average around here is mainstream science. Who is a complete and utter failure at figuing out what's going to happen is YOU.
 

View attachment 903209

And another fundamental warmer prediction come true

View attachment 903210

And……

After 50 years of these doomsday predictions, we are still here and thriving.

It’s about time you doomers admit you were wrong all along and go take a very very long nap.
 
Please recall that the planet was COOLING for 6,000 years before the Industrial Revolution and that the most rapid interglacial warming and CO2 rise took place at a tiny fraction of the rate at which we are warming now.
A natural climate fluctuation which the geologic record is chock full of. Nothing that hasn't happened in every interglacial and glacial period before.
 
And……

After 50 years of these doomsday predictions, we are still here and thriving.

It’s about time you doomers admit you were wrong all along and go take a very very long nap.
Were they wrong when they predicted that CO2 would continue to rise? No.
Were they wrong when they predicted that temperatures would continue to rise? No.
Were they wrong when they predicted that sea levels would continue to rise? No.
Were they wrong when they predicted that the world's ice mass would melt? No.
Were they wrong when they predicted that the ocean would become more acidic from CO2? No.
Were they wrong when they predicted that storm frequency and intensity would increase? No.
Were they wrong when they predicted droughts and heatwaves? No.
Was I wrong when I predicted the lot of you were just too stupid to ever admit the truth? No.
 
Does that have something to do with a prediction by mainstream science?
Yes. They have mistaken a natural warming trend for AGW from a relatively weak GHG which based upon the simple physics of radiative forcing should have contributed at most 0.5 C for an incremental 120 ppm of CO2 and at the least 0.22C.
 
A natural climate fluctuation which the geologic record is chock full of. Nothing that hasn't happened in every interglacial and glacial period before.
You're not addressing the facts.
 
Yes. They have mistaken a natural warming trend for AGW from a relatively weak GHG which based upon the simple physics of radiative forcing should have contributed at most 0.5 C for an incremental 120 ppm of CO2 and at the least 0.22C.
Explain the CO2 rate and the warming rate and the 6,000 years of cooling that preceded it.
 

Forum List

Back
Top