EvilCat Breath
Diamond Member
- Sep 23, 2016
- 81,967
- 57,215
- 2,645
Maybe this bit of nonsense will be the impetus to break up the 9th circus court and restore a little bit of sanity.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Climate change affects the whole planet dipshit. It’s not a “ personal agenda.”So now we can sue politicians for not pushing harder for our personal agendas? WTF?
These truly are The Crazy Years.
Court denies Trump admin’s plea to stop kids’ climate lawsuit
It’s Trump’s personal agenda to destroy the environment/ planet however.
Fuck the sleazy bastard.
Learn to read the links so you stop making an idiot out of yourself so often.So now we can sue politicians for not pushing harder for our personal agendas? WTF?
These truly are The Crazy Years.
Court denies Trump admin’s plea to stop kids’ climate lawsuit
In 2006 there was a SCOTUS decision that ordered the Federal government to monitor emissions and limit, they've had 12 years to do so.
Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency - Wikipedia
Second, the Court held that the CAA gives the EPA the authority to regulate tailpipe emissions of greenhouse gases. The CAA provides:
“The Administrator shall by regulation prescribe (and from time to time revise) in accordance with the provisions of this section, standards applicable to the emission of any air pollutant from any class or classes of new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines, which in his judgment cause, or contribute to, air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare.”[2]
The CAA defines "air pollutant" as "any air pollution agent or combination of such agents, including any physical, chemical, biological, radioactive . . . substance or matter which is emitted into or otherwise enters the ambient air".[10] The majority opinion commented that "greenhouse gases fit well within the CAA’s capacious definition of air pollutant."[11]
Finally, the Court remanded the case to the EPA, requiring the agency to review its contention that it has discretion in regulating carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions. The Court found the current rationale for not regulating to be inadequate and required the agency to articulate a reasonable basis in order to avoid regulation.
Goddamn right we should sue the EPA.
Climate change affects the whole planet dipshit. It’s not a “ personal agenda.”So now we can sue politicians for not pushing harder for our personal agendas? WTF?
These truly are The Crazy Years.
Court denies Trump admin’s plea to stop kids’ climate lawsuit
It’s Trump’s personal agenda to destroy the environment/ planet however.
Fuck the sleazy bastard.
Climate change affects the whole planet dipshit. It’s not a “ personal agenda.”
If it affects the entire planet why does noaa have to falsify their own weather readings to promote their personal agenda?Climate change affects the whole planet dipshit. It’s not a “ personal agenda.”So now we can sue politicians for not pushing harder for our personal agendas? WTF?
These truly are The Crazy Years.
Court denies Trump admin’s plea to stop kids’ climate lawsuit
It’s Trump’s personal agenda to destroy the environment/ planet however.
Fuck the sleazy bastard.
So now we can sue politicians for not pushing harder for our personal agendas? WTF?
These truly are The Crazy Years.
Court denies Trump admin’s plea to stop kids’ climate lawsuit
In 2006 there was a SCOTUS decision that ordered the Federal government to monitor emissions and limit, they've had 12 years to do so.
Massachusetts v. Environmental Protection Agency - Wikipedia
Second, the Court held that the CAA gives the EPA the authority to regulate tailpipe emissions of greenhouse gases. The CAA provides:
“The Administrator shall by regulation prescribe (and from time to time revise) in accordance with the provisions of this section, standards applicable to the emission of any air pollutant from any class or classes of new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines, which in his judgment cause, or contribute to, air pollution which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare.”[2]
The CAA defines "air pollutant" as "any air pollution agent or combination of such agents, including any physical, chemical, biological, radioactive . . . substance or matter which is emitted into or otherwise enters the ambient air".[10] The majority opinion commented that "greenhouse gases fit well within the CAA’s capacious definition of air pollutant."[11]
Finally, the Court remanded the case to the EPA, requiring the agency to review its contention that it has discretion in regulating carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gas emissions. The Court found the current rationale for not regulating to be inadequate and required the agency to articulate a reasonable basis in order to avoid regulation.
Goddamn right we should sue the EPA.
Anthropogenic climate change is a con and a hoax. It's your agenda to destroy the market economy.Climate change affects the whole planet dipshit. It’s not a “ personal agenda.”So now we can sue politicians for not pushing harder for our personal agendas? WTF?
These truly are The Crazy Years.
Court denies Trump admin’s plea to stop kids’ climate lawsuit
It’s Trump’s personal agenda to destroy the environment/ planet however.
Fuck the sleazy bastard.