Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
How many incumbant presidents have been re-elected on those numbers ??? -not since FDR
1 and out for Obama - unless there is an unprecedented economic turnaround by 2012.
How many incumbant presidents have been re-elected on those numbers ??? -not since FDR
1 and out for Obama - unless there is an unprecedented economic turnaround by 2012.
I thought that for a bit...But think about this.Look at how the liberal media talks about what a great job this guy has done.They will push for him again in 2012 and although he should NOT get re elected he probably will.
How many incumbant presidents have been re-elected on those numbers ??? -not since FDR
1 and out for Obama - unless there is an unprecedented economic turnaround by 2012.
8%? The figure last week said 9.1%. Of course, you are right, it's much higher.
8%? The figure last week said 9.1%. Of course, you are right, it's much higher.
No it's not. Unless of course you change the definitions and starting adding in different groups who are not unemployed, etc etc.
8%? The figure last week said 9.1%. Of course, you are right, it's much higher.
No it's not. Unless of course you change the definitions and starting adding in different groups who are not unemployed, etc etc.
You mean if we went back to the original definition instead of this carefully crafted one designed to make it look like we have higher employment than we really have to mask the problem?
Romney will tear him to shreds on the economy - Mitt has creds/track record on that issue.
.....GRAVE-ROBBER!!
How many incumbant presidents have been re-elected on those numbers ??? -not since FDR
1 and out for Obama - unless there is an unprecedented economic turnaround by 2012.
What happened to all of those new private sector jobs that were supposed to be created by you dipshits putting the Republicans back in power in the House? I guess those tax breaks for the wealthy don't create jobs after all, huh?
The U-6 unemployment rate is the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) broadest unemployment measure, including short-term discouraged and other marginally-attached workers as well as those forced to work part-time because they cannot find full-time employment.
OBAMA IS A FAILED PRESIDENT!!!!!!!
youHow many incumbant presidents have been re-elected on those numbers ??? -not since FDR
1 and out for Obama - unless there is an unprecedented economic turnaround by 2012.
What happened to all of those new private sector jobs that were supposed to be created by you dipshits putting the Republicans back in power in the House? I guess those tax breaks for the wealthy don't create jobs after all, huh?
The 2001 act and the 2003 act significantly lowered the marginal tax rates for nearly all U.S. taxpayers. One byproduct of this tax rate reduction was that it brought to prominence a previously lesser known provision of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). The AMT was originally designed as a way of making sure that wealthy taxpayers could not take advantage of "too many" tax incentives and reduce their tax obligation by too much. It is a parallel system of calculating a taxpayer's tax liability that eliminates many deductions. However the applicable AMT rates were not adjusted to match the lowered rates of the 2001 and 2003 acts, causing many more people to face higher taxes. This reduced the benefit of the two acts for many upper-middle income earners, particularly those with deductions for state and local income taxes, dependents, and property taxes.
youHow many incumbant presidents have been re-elected on those numbers ??? -not since FDR
1 and out for Obama - unless there is an unprecedented economic turnaround by 2012.
What happened to all of those new private sector jobs that were supposed to be created by you dipshits putting the Republicans back in power in the House? I guess those tax breaks for the wealthy don't create jobs after all, huh?
Are these the tax codes you call tax breaks for the wealthy?
The 2001 act and the 2003 act significantly lowered the marginal tax rates for nearly all U.S. taxpayers. One byproduct of this tax rate reduction was that it brought to prominence a previously lesser known provision of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code, the Alternative Minimum Tax (AMT). The AMT was originally designed as a way of making sure that wealthy taxpayers could not take advantage of "too many" tax incentives and reduce their tax obligation by too much. It is a parallel system of calculating a taxpayer's tax liability that eliminates many deductions. However the applicable AMT rates were not adjusted to match the lowered rates of the 2001 and 2003 acts, causing many more people to face higher taxes. This reduced the benefit of the two acts for many upper-middle income earners, particularly those with deductions for state and local income taxes, dependents, and property taxes.
Just so you will know, wealth is not taxed in the US, income is. And, unemployment averaged 5.2% during Bush's 8 years. It averaged 9.4% for the first 18 months of Obama's regime. How is that $800 billion bailout working for you?