61 House Republicans Sign Resolution To Condemn Adam Schiff

61 out of 197. That leaves 136 House Republicans that don't want to have anything to do with it. If only the same small percentage of Republican senators support Trump, he could be impeached tomorrow.

He wants Nancy to call the vote. Why hasn't she?

What's your rush? The orange pig will still be there when they decide to do that.
Nancy controls the timing. Patience is a virtue.

Malfeasance if he is as guilty as democrats claim he is. She should be impeached for dereliction of duty and violating her oath of office.
You should start a petition.
 
61 out of 197. That leaves 136 House Republicans that don't want to have anything to do with it. If only the same small percentage of Republican senators support Trump, he could be impeached tomorrow.

He wants Nancy to call the vote. Why hasn't she?

What's your rush? The orange pig will still be there when they decide to do that.
Nancy controls the timing. Patience is a virtue.

Malfeasance if he is as guilty as democrats claim he is. She should be impeached for dereliction of duty and violating her oath of office.
You should start a petition.

Why should I? The House has never voted to authorize the impeachment inquiry and ergo there is no legal impeachment inquiry and all them subpoenas not being responded to will be of no consequence until it does. So far, the democrats are masturbating all over themselves and have yet to actually start the thing they proclaim to have started and are about to finish.
 
He wants Nancy to call the vote. Why hasn't she?

What's your rush? The orange pig will still be there when they decide to do that.
Nancy controls the timing. Patience is a virtue.

Malfeasance if he is as guilty as democrats claim he is. She should be impeached for dereliction of duty and violating her oath of office.
You should start a petition.

Why should I? The House has never voted to authorize the impeachment inquiry and ergo there is no legal impeachment inquiry and all them subpoenas not being responded to will be of no consequence until it does. So far, the democrats are masturbating all over themselves and have yet to actually start the thing they proclaim to have started and are about to finish.

I'm pretty sure subpoenas don't require a vote.
 
61 out of 197. That leaves 136 House Republicans that don't want to have anything to do with it. If only the same small percentage of Republican senators support Trump, he could be impeached tomorrow.

He wants Nancy to call the vote. Why hasn't she?

What's your rush? The orange pig will still be there when they decide to do that.

You don't get it yet...do you, Bullshit? Pelosi won't call for that vote because she doesn't want battleground State Democrats on the record supporting impeachment before the next election! This is all political theatre designed to divert attention from the fact that Democrats are running awful candidates and calling for pie in the sky give-a-ways to try and buy votes!
 
61 out of 197. That leaves 136 House Republicans that don't want to have anything to do with it. If only the same small percentage of Republican senators support Trump, he could be impeached tomorrow.

He wants Nancy to call the vote. Why hasn't she?

What's your rush? The orange pig will still be there when they decide to do that.

You don't get it yet...do you, Bullshit? Pelosi won't call for that vote because she doesn't want battleground State Democrats on the record supporting impeachment before the next election! This is all political theatre designed to divert attention from the fact that Democrats are running awful candidates and calling for pie in the sky give-a-ways to try and buy votes!

538 has public support for impeachment at less than 50%, there is some indication Nancy may not have the votes without strong-arming some democrats, and if even 1 of those democrats rats her out publicly this thing will end up being a wave election going the other way because it will look like the Speaker is extorting them for political gain in a matter of grave national importance. It would be seen the same as jury tampering by the public. It would be a huge gamble with no upside since the Senate will most assuredly find some way to punt this away.
 

Forum List

Back
Top