Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
In New Hampshire, 68% of voters are against repealing the gay marriage law. So who's doing the bullying there?
Not the same.
In NH politicians are doing what they deem is best for the state yet against the will of the voter...
That is what elections are for. They will boot those that vote to repeal the law.
In the case of this thread, NON elected officials are using the power of rhetoric AND numbers to force the state to do something that the majority of the voters do not want done.
And in the end it will cost the state millions and the union memebers millions....for absolutely no reason at all.
Regardless of how you feel about Walker, the mob rule mentality of these Leftist pukes should make us all fear for the future of our Nation.
Since when is working within the democratic system in a lawful way, "mob rule"?
I used to think you conservatives were real tough guys, but you're really very sensitive, aren't you?
ypou are obviously quite naive as to how a recall works.
One can campaign for a recall and collect signatures.
Howevcer, one can NOT campaign for "NO RECALL" and collect MORE signatures.
With this in mind, a group can go out there spending all kinds of money to force a recall...even though the majority of the people dont want one.
Since when is working within the democratic system in a lawful way, "mob rule"?
I used to think you conservatives were real tough guys, but you're really very sensitive, aren't you?
ypou are obviously quite naive as to how a recall works.
One can campaign for a recall and collect signatures.
Howevcer, one can NOT campaign for "NO RECALL" and collect MORE signatures.
With this in mind, a group can go out there spending all kinds of money to force a recall...even though the majority of the people dont want one.
You are forgetting the FACT that a recall petition requires that enough citizens of WI sign the petition in order to have a recall election. A poll of 500 people in no way counters the number of signatures of acutal cititzens it requires to bring about a recall. It doesn't matter how much money comes into it unless they have enough actual signatures.
Does walker bringing in outside money bother you as much as the outside money that is for the recall seems to?
Stay tuned ... random search, you can answer your own question though you may have to change it to the plural.
A Walker aide is not Walker...
Anything Walker personally did that you feel is indictable?
If we incicted people for crimes committed by the people they knew or employed the jails would be standing room only and Barry wouldn't be President....
Guilt by association, you know that. Unless, of course, it's a lib that you're talking about... then his workers actions are not his responsibility.
Nobody was claiming your 0ssiah should be indicted for his association with Wright... Epic fail on your part, dipshit...A Walker aide is not Walker...
Anything Walker personally did that you feel is indictable?
If we incicted people for crimes committed by the people they knew or employed the jails would be standing room only and Barry wouldn't be President....
Guilt by association, you know that. Unless, of course, it's a lib that you're talking about... then his workers actions are not his responsibility.
Guilt by association works for you rightwingers where rev wright and ayers are concerned so why doesn't the same apply for walker?? Funny how you try to claim hypocrisy on the left only to expose it on the right. LOL
Furthermore, the investigation is still under way and if it is possible that walker could be indicted for his involvement which is what the other poster seemed to suggest then how is that guilt by association?
ypou are obviously quite naive as to how a recall works.
One can campaign for a recall and collect signatures.
Howevcer, one can NOT campaign for "NO RECALL" and collect MORE signatures.
With this in mind, a group can go out there spending all kinds of money to force a recall...even though the majority of the people dont want one.
You are forgetting the FACT that a recall petition requires that enough citizens of WI sign the petition in order to have a recall election. A poll of 500 people in no way counters the number of signatures of acutal cititzens it requires to bring about a recall. It doesn't matter how much money comes into it unless they have enough actual signatures.
Does walker bringing in outside money bother you as much as the outside money that is for the recall seems to?
if the amount of signatures required is more than 50% of the voting population...I have no issue.
Otherwise it is a waste of tax payer money.
A Walker aide is not Walker...
Anything Walker personally did that you feel is indictable?
If we incicted people for crimes committed by the people they knew or employed the jails would be standing room only and Barry wouldn't be President....
Guilt by association, you know that. Unless, of course, it's a lib that you're talking about... then his workers actions are not his responsibility.
Guilt by association works for you rightwingers where rev wright and ayers are concerned so why doesn't the same apply for walker?? Funny how you try to claim hypocrisy on the left only to expose it on the right. LOL
Furthermore, the investigation is still under way and if it is possible that walker could be indicted for his involvement which is what the other poster seemed to suggest then how is that guilt by association?
You are forgetting the FACT that a recall petition requires that enough citizens of WI sign the petition in order to have a recall election. A poll of 500 people in no way counters the number of signatures of acutal cititzens it requires to bring about a recall. It doesn't matter how much money comes into it unless they have enough actual signatures.
Does walker bringing in outside money bother you as much as the outside money that is for the recall seems to?
if the amount of signatures required is more than 50% of the voting population...I have no issue.
Otherwise it is a waste of tax payer money.
Then you should fault WI law not those who followed it. It still doesn't change the fact that they cannot "force a recall" without the required number of legal signatures and that money cannot "force a recall".
Again, does walker bringing in outside money bother you as much as the outside money that is for the recall seems to?
Nobody was claiming your 0ssiah should be indicted for his association with Wright... Epic fail on your part, dipshit...Guilt by association, you know that. Unless, of course, it's a lib that you're talking about... then his workers actions are not his responsibility.
Guilt by association works for you rightwingers where rev wright and ayers are concerned so why doesn't the same apply for walker?? Funny how you try to claim hypocrisy on the left only to expose it on the right. LOL
Furthermore, the investigation is still under way and if it is possible that walker could be indicted for his involvement which is what the other poster seemed to suggest then how is that guilt by association?
AND, that's NOT what the other poster said, dumbass...
The other poster said that Walker would be indicted for campaign violations and fraud. It wasn't intimated, it was stated...
You fail again, smithie... Something you're actually good at...
Please cite the law that Walker personally violated that would necessitate his indictment...
Guilt by association, you know that. Unless, of course, it's a lib that you're talking about... then his workers actions are not his responsibility.
Guilt by association works for you rightwingers where rev wright and ayers are concerned so why doesn't the same apply for walker?? Funny how you try to claim hypocrisy on the left only to expose it on the right. LOL
Furthermore, the investigation is still under way and if it is possible that walker could be indicted for his involvement which is what the other poster seemed to suggest then how is that guilt by association?
My issue with Ayers was not his relationship. It was the fact that he lied twice regarding it.
My issue with his relationship with Wright had to do with the fact that he referred to Wright as his "Mentor" of 20 years.....you know....someone that helps mold the ideology of a person.
But please...compare that to some rogue aide.
Walker doesn't seem too worried about this either. He is not even going to challenge the signatures, even though 10-20% are bogus.....
Walker won't file recall petition challengesMADISON, Wis. (AP) Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker won't challenge any of the 1 million petition signatures seeking his recall from office because his campaign staff didn't have enough time to scrutinize them all, a top aide said Monday.
The Republican governor had until 5 p.m. Monday to challenge signatures submitted last month. Despite being granted a 20-day extension to pore over the recall petitions, Walker's campaign managed to look through only about 400,000 of them, campaign spokeswoman Ciara Matthews said. She said the campaign determined that 10 percent to 20 percent of those 400,000 were erroneous, including entries that listed fake addresses and names, including Donald Duck's.
"We have essentially been given an impossible deadline," Matthews said.
The Government Accountability Board, which oversees Wisconsin elections, still has three weeks to determine whether at least 540,208 of the signatures are valid. That is the minimum number needed to trigger a recall election. And the Walker's campaign asked the Government Accountability Board on Monday to consider the findings of two tea party affiliated groups that have been examining the signatures independently.
Nobody was claiming your 0ssiah should be indicted for his association with Wright... Epic fail on your part, dipshit...Guilt by association works for you rightwingers where rev wright and ayers are concerned so why doesn't the same apply for walker?? Funny how you try to claim hypocrisy on the left only to expose it on the right. LOL
Furthermore, the investigation is still under way and if it is possible that walker could be indicted for his involvement which is what the other poster seemed to suggest then how is that guilt by association?
AND, that's NOT what the other poster said, dumbass...
The other poster said that Walker would be indicted for campaign violations and fraud. It wasn't intimated, it was stated...
You fail again, smithie... Something you're actually good at...
Hey moron guilt by association is guilt by association and no one is claiming that walker should be indicted merely because he was associated with those people who worked for him as milwaukee county executer who were campaiging for him on the county's dime either. The guilt by association argument came from you and your less than honest interpretation of what the other poster said.
I never accused anyone of claiming "guilt by association"... More fail from Dr. Smith... Oh, the pain, the pain...If he was involved he should be indicted. I alredy said that in my previous post but it bears repeating because you obviously missed it or omitted it out of sheer partisan blindness and stupidity.
you asked,
Please cite the law that Walker personally violated that would necessitate his indictment...
and he cited an ongoing investigation that could lead to an indictment of walker if he was found to have been involved with his staff campaigning for his run for governor on milwaukee countys dime. It wasn't about guilt by association "dumbass"
The Rs voted Grey out in California (recall) - who are they to complain - The same results are more than likely for Walker, especially when he is indicted for campaign violations and fraud.
Typical smithie - always seeing what isn't there...It appears that the failure is on your part not mine.
LOL
if the amount of signatures required is more than 50% of the voting population...I have no issue.
Otherwise it is a waste of tax payer money.
Then you should fault WI law not those who followed it. It still doesn't change the fact that they cannot "force a recall" without the required number of legal signatures and that money cannot "force a recall".
Again, does walker bringing in outside money bother you as much as the outside money that is for the recall seems to?
My issue IS with the law. I dont think it was written with the belief that it would be abused by a union who doesnt like some laws.
As for the "outside money"....please enlighten me. I am not a resident of WI....I do not know what you are referring to.
In New Hampshire, 68% of voters are against repealing the gay marriage law. So who's doing the bullying there?
Not the same.
In NH politicians are doing what they deem is best for the state yet against the will of the voter...
That is what elections are for. They will boot those that vote to repeal the law.
In the case of this thread, NON elected officials are using the power of rhetoric AND numbers to force the state to do something that the majority of the voters do not want done.
And in the end it will cost the state millions and the union memebers millions....for absolutely no reason at all.
Regardless of how you feel about Walker, the mob rule mentality of these Leftist pukes should make us all fear for the future of our Nation.
Since when is working within the democratic system in a lawful way, "mob rule"?
I used to think you conservatives were real tough guys, but you're really very sensitive, aren't you?
if the amount of signatures required is more than 50% of the voting population...I have no issue.
Otherwise it is a waste of tax payer money.
