Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Yes....they want to ban guns and they want to end the 2nd Amendment...how do we know? They keep telling us they want to ban guns and end the 2nd Amendment....
5 Facts Proving "They Are Coming For Your Guns" Is Not A Conspiracy Theory
1. The mainstream media is openly calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment
It is no secret that every time there are reports of a mass shooting, there are a number of politicians who openly call for gun control, but there has recently been an increase in media outlets joining the anti-gun bandwagon. The Miami Herald published an Op-Ed titled, “Repeal The Second Amendment—It’s Not A Crazy Idea.” Rolling Stone published an explanation on “Why It’s Time To Repeal The Second Amendment.” And USA Today stated, “Repeal The Second Amendment. It’s The Only Way Towards Real Change.”
------
2. Students are parroting the claims and using their platforms as victims of gun violence to push for a ban on guns
Parkland Shooting survivor David Hogg has become the face of the student activist movement against guns, and the demands are troubling. The students are openly supporting a ban on guns that have been deemed “assault rifles,” a ban on high-capacity magazines, a federal background check “on every gun sale,” increasing taxes on gun sales and raising the minimum age to own a gun to 21.
In a speech at a March For Our Lives rally, Stoneman Douglas student Delaney Tarr revealed that even if the students achieve individual bans, they will continue to push until the Second Amendment is fully dismantled. “We will take the big and we will take the small, but we will keep fighting. When they give us that inch, that bump stock ban, we will take a mile. We are not here for breadcrumbs. We are here for real change,” she said.
--------
3. Law Enforcement officials are also calling for a ban on guns—which means they would be the only ones with guns
It is no secret that a ban on guns would result in law enforcement officers and criminals being the only individuals who have guns. Daryl Fisher, a candidate for Buncombe County Sheriff in North Carolina, recently addressed the issue of how police would confiscate the firearms, and when proposed with the quote “you’ll have to pry my guns from my cold, dead hands,” he shrugged his shoulders and said “OK!”
Gun toting expert shoots someone while dancing when his loaded gun fell.
This is why we need laws to keep; you asshole toters from putting people at risk every time you go out in public with a loaded gun.
So you're goal is to live in an accident free world
Accident? Stupid maneuver that should never had happened. If that is all the safer you assholes can carry a gun, we should definately make it illegal.
That was a trained expert, just think what you untrained yahoos can do.
In one year, US - 9.369 murders with a gun (4th in the world), UK - 14.A society that's actually civilized, has no problem with it's members possessing machine guns, rifles, shotguns, handguns, machetes, knives, etc...Actually, gun control works in other civilized countries. Maybe when we're civilized for real.../-----/ These famous leaders agree with you 100%. What could possibly go wrong?I sure hope you're locked and loaded with that much paranoia.Yes....they want to ban guns and they want to end the 2nd Amendment...how do we know? They keep telling us they want to ban guns and end the 2nd Amendment....
5 Facts Proving "They Are Coming For Your Guns" Is Not A Conspiracy Theory
1. The mainstream media is openly calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment
It is no secret that every time there are reports of a mass shooting, there are a number of politicians who openly call for gun control, but there has recently been an increase in media outlets joining the anti-gun bandwagon. The Miami Herald published an Op-Ed titled, “Repeal The Second Amendment—It’s Not A Crazy Idea.” Rolling Stone published an explanation on “Why It’s Time To Repeal The Second Amendment.” And USA Today stated, “Repeal The Second Amendment. It’s The Only Way Towards Real Change.”
------
2. Students are parroting the claims and using their platforms as victims of gun violence to push for a ban on guns
Parkland Shooting survivor David Hogg has become the face of the student activist movement against guns, and the demands are troubling. The students are openly supporting a ban on guns that have been deemed “assault rifles,” a ban on high-capacity magazines, a federal background check “on every gun sale,” increasing taxes on gun sales and raising the minimum age to own a gun to 21.
In a speech at a March For Our Lives rally, Stoneman Douglas student Delaney Tarr revealed that even if the students achieve individual bans, they will continue to push until the Second Amendment is fully dismantled. “We will take the big and we will take the small, but we will keep fighting. When they give us that inch, that bump stock ban, we will take a mile. We are not here for breadcrumbs. We are here for real change,” she said.
--------
3. Law Enforcement officials are also calling for a ban on guns—which means they would be the only ones with guns
It is no secret that a ban on guns would result in law enforcement officers and criminals being the only individuals who have guns. Daryl Fisher, a candidate for Buncombe County Sheriff in North Carolina, recently addressed the issue of how police would confiscate the firearms, and when proposed with the quote “you’ll have to pry my guns from my cold, dead hands,” he shrugged his shoulders and said “OK!”
View attachment 197959
Uncivilized societies--whose members are continuously on the brink of bloody savagery over the smallest of trivialities--are those that see civilian disarmament as a solution to mass murder in their streets.
Anti-rights advocates can now stop holding up these nations as civilized societies.
The consequences of gun control legislation are predictable; and have been predicted by the opponents of such legislation every time it's brought up. It is then fair to conclude that those consequences are the actual objective of such measures. Gun control works here... it works exactly as intended. I submit Columbine, Sandy Hook, Pulse, Parkland, etc. as evidence.
The targets of those atrocities were obeying the "common sense" gun laws governing the possession of such at those venues.
There is only one motive in the desire to see the targets of criminal violence undefended.
There is only one kind of person who desires to see the targets of criminal violence disarmed.
The people who desire to see the targets of criminal violence disarmed are the problem; they are the entire problem, and they are making their intentions clear.
Arrest them, prosecute them, and imprison them.. .and all the rest who would see the targets of their violence disarmed and undefended--and you'll see the end of these atrocities.
Countries Compared by Crime > Murders with firearms. International Statistics at NationMaster.com
They're surrounded by people who want to wipe them and their whole country off the map, and you compare that to the US?/----/ An example you can't refute.What a GREAT example!!!!/----/ It works in Israel.So because of terrorism, everyone should be armed? Wow, that's pretty dumb, even for you.Actually, gun control works in other civilized countries. Maybe when we're civilized for real...
The 130 dead in Paris would disagree with you.
View attachment 198225
They're surrounded by people who want to wipe them and their whole country off the map, and you compare that to the US?/----/ An example you can't refute.What a GREAT example!!!!/----/ It works in Israel.So because of terrorism, everyone should be armed? Wow, that's pretty dumb, even for you.The 130 dead in Paris would disagree with you.
View attachment 198225
Not really... They just use other things to act out their violence.Actually, gun control works in other civilized countries. Maybe when we're civilized for real.../-----/ These famous leaders agree with you 100%. What could possibly go wrong?I sure hope you're locked and loaded with that much paranoia.Yes....they want to ban guns and they want to end the 2nd Amendment...how do we know? They keep telling us they want to ban guns and end the 2nd Amendment....
5 Facts Proving "They Are Coming For Your Guns" Is Not A Conspiracy Theory
1. The mainstream media is openly calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment
It is no secret that every time there are reports of a mass shooting, there are a number of politicians who openly call for gun control, but there has recently been an increase in media outlets joining the anti-gun bandwagon. The Miami Herald published an Op-Ed titled, “Repeal The Second Amendment—It’s Not A Crazy Idea.” Rolling Stone published an explanation on “Why It’s Time To Repeal The Second Amendment.” And USA Today stated, “Repeal The Second Amendment. It’s The Only Way Towards Real Change.”
------
2. Students are parroting the claims and using their platforms as victims of gun violence to push for a ban on guns
Parkland Shooting survivor David Hogg has become the face of the student activist movement against guns, and the demands are troubling. The students are openly supporting a ban on guns that have been deemed “assault rifles,” a ban on high-capacity magazines, a federal background check “on every gun sale,” increasing taxes on gun sales and raising the minimum age to own a gun to 21.
In a speech at a March For Our Lives rally, Stoneman Douglas student Delaney Tarr revealed that even if the students achieve individual bans, they will continue to push until the Second Amendment is fully dismantled. “We will take the big and we will take the small, but we will keep fighting. When they give us that inch, that bump stock ban, we will take a mile. We are not here for breadcrumbs. We are here for real change,” she said.
--------
3. Law Enforcement officials are also calling for a ban on guns—which means they would be the only ones with guns
It is no secret that a ban on guns would result in law enforcement officers and criminals being the only individuals who have guns. Daryl Fisher, a candidate for Buncombe County Sheriff in North Carolina, recently addressed the issue of how police would confiscate the firearms, and when proposed with the quote “you’ll have to pry my guns from my cold, dead hands,” he shrugged his shoulders and said “OK!”
View attachment 197959
You ignore all the gun-related stats. Good for you, Because they bury you.Do you have a link, or is this just more fake shit?They just have more knife violence per capita than we do.Their gun violence rate is way less than here, look it up.It’s still a long way from what our gun violence is.
They were promised that gun violence would decrease if they gave up their guns....guns they did not use to commit crime. What they got in return? More gun violence and more violent crime.....
What did we get as more Americans own and actually carry guns? Gun murder, down 49%.....gun crime down 75%....violent crime down 72%.....please explain how that happened......
They have more assaults per capita than we do
More rapes per capita than we do
Unlike you I don't make shit up
United Kingdom vs United States: Crime Facts and Stats
UK 3 times more crime per 1000 people
UK 2 times as many rapes per 1000
UK 2 times as many assaults per 1000
This is a gun thread, that's why we're talking about guns.In one year, US - 9.369 murders with a gun (4th in the world), UK - 14. Now please, stfu.It's still very low, much lower than ours.Yes it does.
Then tell me why the murder rate in the UK today is not lower than it was before all their gun laws were passed
You didn't answer the question as usual
The UK gun laws did nothing to lower their murder rate
Countries Compared by Crime > Murders with firearms. International Statistics at NationMaster.com
So the fuck what?
Murder is murder it doesn't matter if a gun was used or not
The UK gun laws did absofuckinglutely nothing to lower their murder rate
Why do you idiots think being murdered with a gun is worse than being murdered any one of a million other ways?
Here we go again. Just how many times are you going to keep doing this. One one hand you keep perpetuating the gun "They are trying to take all my guns" culture. And on the other hand, you are glorifying the Mass Shooters. Then you complain that everyone else is glorifying the mass shooters. Newsflash: That someone is YOU.
Now, let's take a look at your Cite. It's listed on the Net as a conspiracy site. It's degree of truth is rated as low. What it does is puts in enough truth to sound true but then scatters falsehoods to take it another direction. The Activist Post is nothing more than a Blog and part of a large group of conspiracy sites. If you stay with it, it puts it's hand out for money. For instance, Dr. Otto Warburg did exist. HE was a Nobel Prize Winner in Nazi Germany. That part is true. But he did NOT find the one and only true cure for cancer. This is where the conspiracy breaks down. He published a few things and was finally debunked in 1962 when he stated that Cancer was only caused by Pollution. He was only partially correct. We know now that some people are born with the cancer built into their dna and even without Pollution, they will end up with Cancer. Meanwhile, the clip continues to scare people that scare already scared people to send them money for this revolutionary cure. This is sad.
Repeal The Second Amendment
You have misrepresented this. The fact remains that the FFS had no idea what would happen AFTER 1850 where our weapons would outgrow our 2nd amendment. The Constitution is a living document. Meaning, it is supposed to be updated as the nation matures. The 2nd amendment was left vague so that it could be updated. It hasn't been. For instance, the first half of it referring to the need for the Organized Militia went by the way in 1917 with the National Guard Act. The 2nd amendment needed to be updated for that. Then our weapons outgrew the safe personal usage of the individual. We now had the full Automatic Weapons, Grenade Launchers and more. And let's not forget the rifle that started it all, the Browning Model 1917 Automatic Rifle. This rifle was so good that the US decided NOT to send it to Europe during WWI in fear that it would be copied by the Germans and used against us. The BAR (Browning Automatic Rifle) brought us the M-1, M-14 and Mini-14. But the Civilian versions of the M-1, M-14 and MIni-14 were semi-auto and really made lousy military weapons as they were a bit cumbersome. The Thompson and other Automatic Rifles were found to be just too destructive for civilian life. What brought them down was that fact that they were used in spray and pray and more innocents were being killed than the bad guys that were intended to be killed. Something had to be done.
What was done was the Firearms Act of 1934. Rather than go out and completely outlaw them, they stopped manufacture of them. They also stopped manufacture of replacement parts. You could no longer sell them, transfer them, give them away or even will them to your children. Every time they found one used in a crime, they destroyed the weapon. In about a 10 year time, the Thompson was completely off the streets and out of the Criminals hands. And when they broke, they became a wall hangar. You can sell, give away, bequeath a wall hanger if you disable it from ever being used as a firearm again. Many went into firearms collectors hands who had FFL Licenses who could buy and sell them legally to others with FFL licenses. They weren't banned at all.
The question remains, is the creation of the FFL regulation against the 2nd amendment? Why was it not then but it is now? And do we need to keep the vagueness of the 2nd amendment, repeal it and replace it or just amend it like we have with other amendments? We do need something to protect our personal firearms but we need a clear idea of what we need those firearms to be used for and then match the class of firearms to the need. I can use a Bazooka to hunt deer with but it's not the best tool. But that Remington Model 700 is a much better choice.
Students are parroting the claims and using their platforms as victims of gun violence to push for a ban on guns
Could it be that they just don't want to be next on the kill list? I can see how the Little Girl scares the living hell out of you. She just turned Voting Age as does millions of other graduating High School Seniors that don't wish for their younger brothers, sisters and friends to be the next victims. You can't buy their votes. You can't buy their support. The Bought and Paid for Politicians are having to do a complete rethink. Some are starting to do a rethink. But first they have to sever the pig trough they have been eating at and that is hard to do. Here are most of the students are going for:
1. Increasing the buying age of firearms to 21
2. decreasing the number of rounds in a magazine
3. comprehensive background checks with NO exceptions
4. Classifying firearms to what is for personal protection, hunting and what is not
Look for this to become nationwide state to state. It's happening already. Those Piggies are going to have to go find jobs. Not to worry, the Corporations they have been working for all along have jobs waiting for them. They certainly don't work for the American People. This is what those Young Adults are saying.
Law Enforcement officials are also calling for a ban on guns—which means they would be the only ones with guns
Your site showed just a few seconds of what this Sheriff said. it's called taking it out of context. Here is an interview by a Republican Newsman afterwards.
States are chipping away at the constitutional rights granted by the Second Amendment by passing laws banning guns that have been deemed “assault rifles”
They used Boulder as an example. Once again, misinformation. Yes, the ordinance passed but it's not in affect. They are still trying to hammer out the details. It''s complicated. For instance, some parts of it goes just a bit too far while other parts are just impossible to enforce. While the idea is good, the final product may look completely different than the beginning document.
Congress recently passed legislation that gives federal agencies power over gun control, effectively putting every American’s Second Amendment rights at risk
Horsepucky. The Federall Government has very little rights to regulate firearms outside off the extreme weapons. The States hold those rights.
I just love your scare tactics. And that is all they are. Misinformation of the worst kind. Please stop this nonsense. It's getting people killed.
You ignore all the gun-related stats. Good for you, Because they bury you.Do you have a link, or is this just more fake shit?They just have more knife violence per capita than we do.Their gun violence rate is way less than here, look it up.They were promised that gun violence would decrease if they gave up their guns....guns they did not use to commit crime. What they got in return? More gun violence and more violent crime.....
What did we get as more Americans own and actually carry guns? Gun murder, down 49%.....gun crime down 75%....violent crime down 72%.....please explain how that happened......
They have more assaults per capita than we do
More rapes per capita than we do
Unlike you I don't make shit up
United Kingdom vs United States: Crime Facts and Stats
UK 3 times more crime per 1000 people
UK 2 times as many rapes per 1000
UK 2 times as many assaults per 1000
This is a gun thread, that's why we're talking about guns.In one year, US - 9.369 murders with a gun (4th in the world), UK - 14. Now please, stfu.It's still very low, much lower than ours.Then tell me why the murder rate in the UK today is not lower than it was before all their gun laws were passed
You didn't answer the question as usual
The UK gun laws did nothing to lower their murder rate
Countries Compared by Crime > Murders with firearms. International Statistics at NationMaster.com
So the fuck what?
Murder is murder it doesn't matter if a gun was used or not
The UK gun laws did absofuckinglutely nothing to lower their murder rate
Why do you idiots think being murdered with a gun is worse than being murdered any one of a million other ways?
"The UK gun laws did absofuckinglutely nothing to lower their murder rate" You mean lower it from 14?
In red America firearm violence is basically nonexistent… The same cannot be said in blue AmericaIn one year, US - 9.369 murders with a gun (4th in the world), UK - 14. Now please, stfu.It's still very low, much lower than ours.No it doesn't
Yes it does.
Then tell me why the murder rate in the UK today is not lower than it was before all their gun laws were passed
You didn't answer the question as usual
The UK gun laws did nothing to lower their murder rate
Countries Compared by Crime > Murders with firearms. International Statistics at NationMaster.com
US had 9,369 murders in one year. The UK had 14 in the same year. What don't you get? "enhanced reduction"? You mean from 14? Seriously? And and increase to what? 17, that will make that stat look really bad? Try some honesty for a change.In one year, US - 9.369 murders with a gun (4th in the world), UK - 14.A society that's actually civilized, has no problem with it's members possessing machine guns, rifles, shotguns, handguns, machetes, knives, etc...Actually, gun control works in other civilized countries. Maybe when we're civilized for real.../-----/ These famous leaders agree with you 100%. What could possibly go wrong?I sure hope you're locked and loaded with that much paranoia.
View attachment 197959
Uncivilized societies--whose members are continuously on the brink of bloody savagery over the smallest of trivialities--are those that see civilian disarmament as a solution to mass murder in their streets.
Anti-rights advocates can now stop holding up these nations as civilized societies.
The consequences of gun control legislation are predictable; and have been predicted by the opponents of such legislation every time it's brought up. It is then fair to conclude that those consequences are the actual objective of such measures. Gun control works here... it works exactly as intended. I submit Columbine, Sandy Hook, Pulse, Parkland, etc. as evidence.
The targets of those atrocities were obeying the "common sense" gun laws governing the possession of such at those venues.
There is only one motive in the desire to see the targets of criminal violence undefended.
There is only one kind of person who desires to see the targets of criminal violence disarmed.
The people who desire to see the targets of criminal violence disarmed are the problem; they are the entire problem, and they are making their intentions clear.
Arrest them, prosecute them, and imprison them.. .and all the rest who would see the targets of their violence disarmed and undefended--and you'll see the end of these atrocities.
Countries Compared by Crime > Murders with firearms. International Statistics at NationMaster.com
Rhetorical Tautology.
Everyone accepts that if there were no guns what-so-ever, there'd be no "gun-crime" what-so ever. Only disingenuous idiots attempt to use such tautologies as the foundation for their retarded arguments.
No one argues that there are few murders in the U.S.
No one argues that the murder rate is lowest in the U.S.
The point you're avoiding is that where prohibitionist gun control measure are instituted, those places see no enhanced reduction in violent crime (including murders) and often see an increase in violent crime (including murders.
Yes....they want to ban guns and they want to end the 2nd Amendment...how do we know? They keep telling us they want to ban guns and end the 2nd Amendment....
5 Facts Proving "They Are Coming For Your Guns" Is Not A Conspiracy Theory
1. The mainstream media is openly calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment
It is no secret that every time there are reports of a mass shooting, there are a number of politicians who openly call for gun control, but there has recently been an increase in media outlets joining the anti-gun bandwagon. The Miami Herald published an Op-Ed titled, “Repeal The Second Amendment—It’s Not A Crazy Idea.” Rolling Stone published an explanation on “Why It’s Time To Repeal The Second Amendment.” And USA Today stated, “Repeal The Second Amendment. It’s The Only Way Towards Real Change.”
------
2. Students are parroting the claims and using their platforms as victims of gun violence to push for a ban on guns
Parkland Shooting survivor David Hogg has become the face of the student activist movement against guns, and the demands are troubling. The students are openly supporting a ban on guns that have been deemed “assault rifles,” a ban on high-capacity magazines, a federal background check “on every gun sale,” increasing taxes on gun sales and raising the minimum age to own a gun to 21.
In a speech at a March For Our Lives rally, Stoneman Douglas student Delaney Tarr revealed that even if the students achieve individual bans, they will continue to push until the Second Amendment is fully dismantled. “We will take the big and we will take the small, but we will keep fighting. When they give us that inch, that bump stock ban, we will take a mile. We are not here for breadcrumbs. We are here for real change,” she said.
--------
3. Law Enforcement officials are also calling for a ban on guns—which means they would be the only ones with guns
It is no secret that a ban on guns would result in law enforcement officers and criminals being the only individuals who have guns. Daryl Fisher, a candidate for Buncombe County Sheriff in North Carolina, recently addressed the issue of how police would confiscate the firearms, and when proposed with the quote “you’ll have to pry my guns from my cold, dead hands,” he shrugged his shoulders and said “OK!”
Gun toting expert shoots someone while dancing when his loaded gun fell.
This is why we need laws to keep; you asshole toters from putting people at risk every time you go out in public with a loaded gun.
In red America firearm violence is basically nonexistent… The same cannot be said in blue AmericaIn one year, US - 9.369 murders with a gun (4th in the world), UK - 14. Now please, stfu.It's still very low, much lower than ours.Yes it does.
Then tell me why the murder rate in the UK today is not lower than it was before all their gun laws were passed
You didn't answer the question as usual
The UK gun laws did nothing to lower their murder rate
Countries Compared by Crime > Murders with firearms. International Statistics at NationMaster.com
It's an idiotic comparison, other than to say that yes, the US is also at war, but with itself.They're surrounded by people who want to wipe them and their whole country off the map, and you compare that to the US?/----/ An example you can't refute.What a GREAT example!!!!/----/ It works in Israel.So because of terrorism, everyone should be armed? Wow, that's pretty dumb, even for you.
View attachment 198225
And even with people carrying those guns everywhere the murder rate in Israel is about 2 per 100000
So more guns do not equal more murder just as more gun laws do not equal less murder
US had 9,369 murders in one year. The UK had 14 in the same year. What don't you get? "enhanced reduction"? You mean from 14? Seriously? And and increase to what? 17, that will make that stat look really bad? Try some honesty for a change.In one year, US - 9.369 murders with a gun (4th in the world), UK - 14.A society that's actually civilized, has no problem with it's members possessing machine guns, rifles, shotguns, handguns, machetes, knives, etc...Actually, gun control works in other civilized countries. Maybe when we're civilized for real.../-----/ These famous leaders agree with you 100%. What could possibly go wrong?
View attachment 197959
Uncivilized societies--whose members are continuously on the brink of bloody savagery over the smallest of trivialities--are those that see civilian disarmament as a solution to mass murder in their streets.
Anti-rights advocates can now stop holding up these nations as civilized societies.
The consequences of gun control legislation are predictable; and have been predicted by the opponents of such legislation every time it's brought up. It is then fair to conclude that those consequences are the actual objective of such measures. Gun control works here... it works exactly as intended. I submit Columbine, Sandy Hook, Pulse, Parkland, etc. as evidence.
The targets of those atrocities were obeying the "common sense" gun laws governing the possession of such at those venues.
There is only one motive in the desire to see the targets of criminal violence undefended.
There is only one kind of person who desires to see the targets of criminal violence disarmed.
The people who desire to see the targets of criminal violence disarmed are the problem; they are the entire problem, and they are making their intentions clear.
Arrest them, prosecute them, and imprison them.. .and all the rest who would see the targets of their violence disarmed and undefended--and you'll see the end of these atrocities.
Countries Compared by Crime > Murders with firearms. International Statistics at NationMaster.com
Rhetorical Tautology.
Everyone accepts that if there were no guns what-so-ever, there'd be no "gun-crime" what-so ever. Only disingenuous idiots attempt to use such tautologies as the foundation for their retarded arguments.
No one argues that there are few murders in the U.S.
No one argues that the murder rate is lowest in the U.S.
The point you're avoiding is that where prohibitionist gun control measure are instituted, those places see no enhanced reduction in violent crime (including murders) and often see an increase in violent crime (including murders.
Not really... They just use other things to act out their violence.Actually, gun control works in other civilized countries. Maybe when we're civilized for real.../-----/ These famous leaders agree with you 100%. What could possibly go wrong?I sure hope you're locked and loaded with that much paranoia.Yes....they want to ban guns and they want to end the 2nd Amendment...how do we know? They keep telling us they want to ban guns and end the 2nd Amendment....
5 Facts Proving "They Are Coming For Your Guns" Is Not A Conspiracy Theory
1. The mainstream media is openly calling for the repeal of the Second Amendment
It is no secret that every time there are reports of a mass shooting, there are a number of politicians who openly call for gun control, but there has recently been an increase in media outlets joining the anti-gun bandwagon. The Miami Herald published an Op-Ed titled, “Repeal The Second Amendment—It’s Not A Crazy Idea.” Rolling Stone published an explanation on “Why It’s Time To Repeal The Second Amendment.” And USA Today stated, “Repeal The Second Amendment. It’s The Only Way Towards Real Change.”
------
2. Students are parroting the claims and using their platforms as victims of gun violence to push for a ban on guns
Parkland Shooting survivor David Hogg has become the face of the student activist movement against guns, and the demands are troubling. The students are openly supporting a ban on guns that have been deemed “assault rifles,” a ban on high-capacity magazines, a federal background check “on every gun sale,” increasing taxes on gun sales and raising the minimum age to own a gun to 21.
In a speech at a March For Our Lives rally, Stoneman Douglas student Delaney Tarr revealed that even if the students achieve individual bans, they will continue to push until the Second Amendment is fully dismantled. “We will take the big and we will take the small, but we will keep fighting. When they give us that inch, that bump stock ban, we will take a mile. We are not here for breadcrumbs. We are here for real change,” she said.
--------
3. Law Enforcement officials are also calling for a ban on guns—which means they would be the only ones with guns
It is no secret that a ban on guns would result in law enforcement officers and criminals being the only individuals who have guns. Daryl Fisher, a candidate for Buncombe County Sheriff in North Carolina, recently addressed the issue of how police would confiscate the firearms, and when proposed with the quote “you’ll have to pry my guns from my cold, dead hands,” he shrugged his shoulders and said “OK!”
View attachment 197959
And on top of that firearms still make their way into those countries even though you gun grabbers say that gun control will stop All gun violence...
It's an idiotic comparison, other than to say that yes, the US is also at war, but with itself.They're surrounded by people who want to wipe them and their whole country off the map, and you compare that to the US?/----/ An example you can't refute.What a GREAT example!!!!/----/ It works in Israel.
View attachment 198225
And even with people carrying those guns everywhere the murder rate in Israel is about 2 per 100000
So more guns do not equal more murder just as more gun laws do not equal less murder
I'd rather be attacked by anything other than a firearm. Maybe that's just me?You ignore all the gun-related stats. Good for you, Because they bury you.Do you have a link, or is this just more fake shit?They just have more knife violence per capita than we do.Their gun violence rate is way less than here, look it up.
They have more assaults per capita than we do
More rapes per capita than we do
Unlike you I don't make shit up
United Kingdom vs United States: Crime Facts and Stats
UK 3 times more crime per 1000 people
UK 2 times as many rapes per 1000
UK 2 times as many assaults per 1000
Tell me why is a murder committed with a gun worse than a murder committed with a knife?
Crime is crime
Murder is murder
Rape is rape
Gun laws in the UK did not reduce their murder rate or their crime rate
Yes we have more gun crimes because we have more guns but the UK has 3 times as many crimes per capita than we do
Crime and murder are determined and affected by more variables than guns and guns alone
