4 Things You May Not Know About Climate Change

Discussion in 'Environment' started by Hayen Mill, May 23, 2009.

  1. Hayen Mill
    Offline

    Hayen Mill Rookie

    Joined:
    May 23, 2009
    Messages:
    30
    Thanks Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +3
    Interesting Alternative article on Climate Change

    4 Things You May Not Know About Climate Change

    [​IMG]

    Thoughts?
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
    Last edited: May 23, 2009
  2. elvis
    Offline

    elvis BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2008
    Messages:
    25,882
    Thanks Received:
    4,303
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Ratings:
    +4,303
    Old Rockhead and Kirky Lewinsky will be on soon to tell you how stupid you are for challenging the agenda of St. Albert. And also that any scientist you quote who denies that global warming is man-made is no scientist at all.
     
  3. Hayen Mill
    Offline

    Hayen Mill Rookie

    Joined:
    May 23, 2009
    Messages:
    30
    Thanks Received:
    3
    Trophy Points:
    1
    Ratings:
    +3
    Thanks for the warning ^^

    I'm really just showing the article though. Don't crucify me! I wasn't paid by Oil Companies!
     
  4. Chris
    Offline

    Chris Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2008
    Messages:
    23,154
    Thanks Received:
    1,958
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    Virginia
    Ratings:
    +2,089
    CO2 in the atmosphere causes the earth to retain heat. This was proven experimentally in 1859.

    We have increased atmospheric CO2 by 40% in the last 200 years. We are adding billions of tons of CO2 to the atmosphere every year. CO2 is now at its highest level ever recorded, and the Antarctic ice core record goes back 600,000 years.

    The Sun is going through its lowest level of activity in 96 years.

    These are the facts. Everything else is just bullshit.
     
  5. KittenKoder
    Offline

    KittenKoder Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Messages:
    23,281
    Thanks Received:
    1,711
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Ratings:
    +1,714
    See? Right on cue.
     
  6. RetiredGySgt
    Offline

    RetiredGySgt Platinum Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    39,576
    Thanks Received:
    5,902
    Trophy Points:
    1,140
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +8,993
    Once again CO2 has a diminishing effect on the retention of heat, the more you add the less increase you get. Further as was pointed out WATER VAPOR not CO2 is the main warmer.

    You are dishonest to the core, You argue the Sun had nothing to do with warming and then turn around and butcher the report on LOWEST Sun activity since 1928 with a claim that by 2013 we will all be dying in a new heat wave. Created, BY THE SUN. And Old Rocks agrees with your ignorance.
     
  7. Chris
    Offline

    Chris Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2008
    Messages:
    23,154
    Thanks Received:
    1,958
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    Virginia
    Ratings:
    +2,089
    Why do you lie about what I said?

    I never argued that the Sun has no effect on climate.

    Likewise I never said we would be "dying in a new heat wave."

    The effect of the rise in CO2 will always work in conjunction with the Sun's level of activity. The Sun will heat up by 2013 because of the Sun's cycle. How hot will it be? No one knows.
     
  8. Oddball
    Offline

    Oddball BANNED Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    41,428
    Thanks Received:
    8,397
    Trophy Points:
    0
    Location:
    Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
    Ratings:
    +8,409
    Talk about your bullshit.....

    The Earf is not in a bell jar, therefore it's impossible to take into account all organic and inorganic variables.

    That willfully misleading 40% number is in reference to a variable gas that amounts to a mere .04% of the mix.

    The magnetosphere is at its lowest strength in decades.

    "On record" extends back, reliably, no more than a century.

    Correlation doesn't equal causation.

    Anthropogenic global warming junk science fails standard scientific acid tests that have been accepted for centuries:
    1) It is not physically reproducible.

    2) It has no static control model or group.

    3) It fails falsifiability​
     
  9. Chris
    Offline

    Chris Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 30, 2008
    Messages:
    23,154
    Thanks Received:
    1,958
    Trophy Points:
    205
    Location:
    Virginia
    Ratings:
    +2,089
    In fact there is a control group. The CO2 levels of the last 600,000 years are recorded in the Antarctic ice cores.

    Do a little reading.
     
  10. KittenKoder
    Offline

    KittenKoder Senior Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2008
    Messages:
    23,281
    Thanks Received:
    1,711
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    Nowhere
    Ratings:
    +1,714
    See? Ignoring all facts except just one to prove a false point. Talk about case in point.
     

Share This Page