269-269 tie scenario to BLOW YOUR MIND

Discussion in 'Election Forums' started by OohPooPahDoo, Oct 20, 2012.

  1. OohPooPahDoo
    Offline

    OohPooPahDoo Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    15,342
    Thanks Received:
    976
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Location:
    N'Awlins Mid-City
    Ratings:
    +1,320
    Suppose on election day Mitt wins 269 and Obama 269.

    No candidate has a majority. The vote goes to the House.

    But the electors don't cast the actual vote until December 15th. There are 24 states that have laws to punish faithless electors. The rest do not. An elector may cast his vote for any eligible citizens he chooses, so long as each of the two are from different states. Further, an elector in a state which punishes his for voting against his pledge will still be able to cast a faithless vote and it will be counted - he will just have to face a punishment imposed by his state.

    Given that the election will definitively go to the House unless one elector that is pledged to Obama votes for Romney instead or vice versa - at this point the electors may change their votes up to influence the remainder of the process.


    Since the House picks from the top 3 candidates for President, even even a single elector votes for a 3rd party candidate - such as Gary Johson - the House will get to choose from Romney, Obama, and that 3rd party candidate. Given only the choice of Obama and Romney, its clear the House would pick Romney. But - if a third party choice of Gary Johnson is available and constituent support demands it, some of those teabag morons in the House may go for Gary Johnson instead.

    So - if the electoral college vote is 269 ROmney 268 Obama 1 Gary Johnson, with the Johnson vote being cast by a faithless Obama elector with the express purpose of splitting the House vote - and the House vote is successfully split - it is sufficient to deny Romney 25 state delegations, whether they vote for Obama or Johnson or split and cast no vote does not matter - then the House will be unable to choose a President!


    Then whomever the Senate picks as VP would Act as President!

    Ryan if the Senate is Republican - but BIDEN if it is Democrat?

    Not so fast!

    The faithless electors could further influence the election.

    Say the electoral vote is 269 Romney 134 Obama 135 Johnson, with 135 faithless Democrat electors switching their votes from Obama to Johson for President. Say this deadlocks the house because the teabaggers refuse to budge from Johnson.

    Now say those 135 electors also switch their VP vote to OBAMA. Then the vote for VP is 269 Ryan 135 Obama 134 Biden - the Senate chooses from the top TWO candidates so if they are Democratic, Obama would be the choice! Then Obama would hold the office of Vice President, but he would Act as President since the Office of PResident would be vacant until the House came out of deadlock.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  2. Lumpy 1
    Offline

    Lumpy 1 Diamond Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jun 19, 2009
    Messages:
    33,136
    Thanks Received:
    8,541
    Trophy Points:
    1,370
    Ratings:
    +14,857
    Well, it makes me wish even more that Obama gets his butt kicked...:wink_2:
     
  3. there4eyeM
    Offline

    there4eyeM unlicensed metaphysician

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2012
    Messages:
    8,056
    Thanks Received:
    820
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,296
    I like the idea.

    Of course, these totals are based on only two candidates sharing the (ridiculous) electoral votes. Another party could get a few somewhere.

    When are we going to change this silly system?
     
  4. Lovebears65
    Offline

    Lovebears65 Gold Member

    Joined:
    Apr 17, 2011
    Messages:
    6,259
    Thanks Received:
    1,468
    Trophy Points:
    255
    Location:
    Georgia
    Ratings:
    +2,040
    If there is a tie the speaker of the house gets to chose the winner.. Good bye Obama lol
     
  5. there4eyeM
    Offline

    there4eyeM unlicensed metaphysician

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2012
    Messages:
    8,056
    Thanks Received:
    820
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,296
    Another good argument against the electoral system.
     
  6. Saigon
    Offline

    Saigon Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 4, 2012
    Messages:
    11,434
    Thanks Received:
    870
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Location:
    Helsinki, Finland
    Ratings:
    +1,240
    I somehow suspect a repeat of the Florida vote rigging scandal would take place. Lawyers, fraud and lies.
     
  7. Imnukingfutz
    Offline

    Imnukingfutz Senior Member

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2012
    Messages:
    157
    Thanks Received:
    18
    Trophy Points:
    46
    Location:
    Kingdom of Nigh
    Ratings:
    +28
    The electoral college is a way to ensure that the smaller less populated states have an equal say as the larger more populated states.

    If it were decided on popular vote, the Presidency could be decided by the population of only 9 states.

    In my opinion, each state should only count as 1 vote, that would give each state the exact same voice when it comes to the office of President.

    OR

    We could just let the state legislatures decide who becomes President....after all there is no Constitutional right to vote for President.
     
  8. there4eyeM
    Offline

    there4eyeM unlicensed metaphysician

    Joined:
    Jul 5, 2012
    Messages:
    8,056
    Thanks Received:
    820
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Ratings:
    +2,296
    A right not enumerated remains a right.

    The House of Representatives is democratically elected and has the greater power as all money used must go through it. The Senate is there to balance protection of the small vs the big.

    The president represents all the people. All the people should vote for the post.
     
  9. peach174
    Offline

    peach174 Gold Member Gold Supporting Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2010
    Messages:
    20,523
    Thanks Received:
    4,042
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    S.E. AZ
    Ratings:
    +7,360
    Your assuming that the Tea Party in the House will vote for Gary Johnson.
    Tea Party is not for a third party candidate. They are working to change the way business is done up in Washington through the two party system.
    The Tea Party Representatives will vote for who voted in the majority of their districts. That would be Gov. Romney.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  10. OohPooPahDoo
    Offline

    OohPooPahDoo Gold Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2011
    Messages:
    15,342
    Thanks Received:
    976
    Trophy Points:
    175
    Location:
    N'Awlins Mid-City
    Ratings:
    +1,320
    The scenario in the OP itself requires that a third party candidate get one or more electoral votes. Did you read it?
     

Share This Page