2012 debunked by NASA

Discussion in 'Science and Technology' started by RetiredGySgt, Nov 17, 2009.

  1. RetiredGySgt
    Online

    RetiredGySgt Diamond Member

    Joined:
    May 6, 2007
    Messages:
    42,529
    Thanks Received:
    6,761
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    North Carolina
    Ratings:
    +12,456
    AFP: NASA on Crusade to Debunk '2012' Apocalypse Myths

    Of course my question is.... Did NASA or anyone else debunk the movie " The Day After"?

    People are gonna believe what they want to believe. Fact and reality have little to do with some beliefs. BUT really? NASA felt a need to debunk this Hollywood Movie but no one felt a need to say anything official about " The Day After"?
     
  2. Care4all
    Offline

    Care4all Warrior Princess Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Mar 24, 2007
    Messages:
    42,430
    Thanks Received:
    9,139
    Trophy Points:
    2,070
    Location:
    Maine
    Ratings:
    +19,509
    interesting point....

    Why would they take the time to debunk such, unless there are some REAL possibilities in it?
     
  3. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    57,953
    Thanks Received:
    7,013
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +18,087
    Neither "The Day After" or "2012" are based on science. Mayan prophesies concern the end of a cycle, not the end of the world. Climate change, while the it can be rapid, is hardly that dramatic. A much more reasonable approach would be to have looked at what happened in 1816, in New England, and in 2008 in Australia.
     
  4. GHook93
    Offline

    GHook93 Aristotle

    Joined:
    Apr 22, 2007
    Messages:
    20,151
    Thanks Received:
    3,476
    Trophy Points:
    290
    Location:
    Chicago
    Ratings:
    +6,756
    Because people are starting to give in to irrational fears!:(
     
  5. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    57,953
    Thanks Received:
    7,013
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +18,087
    Unfortunetly, Hook, you are correct. All too many people are far more willing to accept the dramatic, rather than the more mundane. And not willing at all to do the research into what is being stated.
     
  6. alan1
    Offline

    alan1 USMB Mod Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2008
    Messages:
    18,845
    Thanks Received:
    3,575
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Shoveling the ashes
    Ratings:
    +3,768
    NASA probably figured that if there were enough people stupid enough to put Mr Obama in the white house, they better do something to convince those stupid people that the world wasn't going to end.
     
  7. Old Rocks
    Offline

    Old Rocks Diamond Member

    Joined:
    Oct 31, 2008
    Messages:
    57,953
    Thanks Received:
    7,013
    Trophy Points:
    1,840
    Location:
    Portland, Ore.
    Ratings:
    +18,087
    Well, I will give President Obama at least a couple of years, seeing what he inherited from the brilliant Neo-cons that preceded him.
     
    • Thank You! Thank You! x 1
  8. goldcatt
    Offline

    goldcatt Catch me if you can! Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2009
    Messages:
    10,330
    Thanks Received:
    2,331
    Trophy Points:
    48
    Location:
    CentralPA
    Ratings:
    +2,332
    But if you look at the science, there are exactly zero possibilities for catastrophe caused by the galactic non-alignment. There are, however, infinite possibilities for catastrophe caused by people who actually believe the hype that's been created to market a theory that's part Mayan belief, part astrology (NOT astronomy), part Hollywood and part pure ignorance.
     
  9. Oddball
    Offline

    Oddball Diamond Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Jan 3, 2009
    Messages:
    41,842
    Thanks Received:
    8,547
    Trophy Points:
    2,020
    Location:
    Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
    Ratings:
    +9,117
    Interesting the dichotomy of action vs. inaction when you have a vested interest in peddling a political agenda, huh?
     
  10. alan1
    Offline

    alan1 USMB Mod Staff Member Supporting Member

    Joined:
    Dec 13, 2008
    Messages:
    18,845
    Thanks Received:
    3,575
    Trophy Points:
    245
    Location:
    Shoveling the ashes
    Ratings:
    +3,768
    What he inherited, and how he chooses to address it won't cause the end of the world. Unless, he leads us into a nuclear war. I'm sure he is intent upon doing that as his last 4 predecessors were.
     

Share This Page