Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
01. Do you agree that convicts should not have access, aka be allowed to own guns?
02. Do you believe that an individual should be tested for mental competency before being allowed to own a gun?
Why/why not?
01. Do you agree that convicts should not have access, aka be allowed to own guns?
02. Do you believe that an individual should be tested for mental competency before being allowed to own a gun?
Why/why not?
What part of "shall not be infringed" don't you understand?
01. Do you agree that convicts should not have access, aka be allowed to own guns?
02. Do you believe that an individual should be tested for mental competency before being allowed to own a gun?
Why/why not?
What part of "shall not be infringed" don't you understand?
What part of "for the general welfare of the people" don't you understand?
Going forward, I'd prefer if you either answer the questions...or keep out. Don't continue to troll. Please.
Thanks.
I don't care what you'd prefer. If you think the Second Amendment has anything to do with guns, you're not in a position to express your preferences. You don't understand it.
I'm just trying to help.
Should there be restrictions on gun ownership? Yes, but you paint with too broad a brush.
I don't care what you'd prefer. If you think the Second Amendment has anything to do with guns, you're not in a position to express your preferences. You don't understand it.
I'm just trying to help.
Thus far your only response was to attack.
Although the questions being asked are totally valid and reasonable.
Interesting.
01. Do you agree that convicts should not have access, aka be allowed to own guns?
02. Do you believe that an individual should be tested for mental competency before being allowed to own a gun?
Why/why not?
01. Do you agree that convicts should not have access, aka be allowed to own guns?
02. Do you believe that an individual should be tested for mental competency before being allowed to own a gun?
Why/why not?
1. If you mean felons, YES
2. When your government is trying to class returning War Veterans as possible terrorist, Not just NO But HELL NO.
You can't trust the government to give a fair test or to not manipulate the answers into something their not.
1. If you mean felons, YES
2. When your government is trying to class returning War Veterans as possible terrorist, Not just NO But HELL NO.
You can't trust the government to give a fair test or to not manipulate the answers into something their not.
Felons. Such as Bernie Madoff, but not someone convicted of several DUI's? How about vets suffering from PTSD?
01. Do you agree that convicts should not have access, aka be allowed to own guns?
02. Do you believe that an individual should be tested for mental competency before being allowed to own a gun?
Why/why not?
Yes to felons owning guns, and no to giving mental tests to own a gun. We shouldn't interefer with "Shall Not Be Infringed." There were convicts & mental cases when the founding fathers wrote the constitution and they made no exception against anyone, while make a clause to insure it wasn't changed.
01. Do you agree that convicts should not have access, aka be allowed to own guns?
02. Do you believe that an individual should be tested for mental competency before being allowed to own a gun?
Why/why not?
Yes to felons owning guns, and no to giving mental tests to own a gun. We shouldn't interefer with "Shall Not Be Infringed." There were convicts & mental cases when the founding fathers wrote the constitution and they made no exception against anyone, while make a clause to insure it wasn't changed.
How many might someone with murderous intent kill while armed with a flint lock?
1. Not all convicts. Those convicted of violent crime would sit ok with me, although constitutionally, it is a very difficult area.
2. No. Mainly because mental illness can develop at any time. Also, most people with mental illness - properly medicated - cope fine. Legislating it won't catch the 'Loughners'.