Soggy in NOLA
Diamond Member
- Jul 31, 2009
- 40,565
- 5,359
- 1,830
The charade of the $2.0 tril. of federal spending cuts has been game-played now for two or three weeks.
1) There is no explanation of why such cuts are needed, in advanced civilization with a $52.0 tril. credit market.
2) There is no explanation of what is intended to replace the spending.
3) Mostly, even Emancipation mainly just took property and assets away!
Featured Document: The Emancipation Proclamation
Lincoln didn't even expect that the freed slaves would even be able to work for a reasonable wage. Only when allowed, should the freed slaves do that.
Outcome Then: Fewer paying customers in the stores.
Outcome Now: Intended, Fewer paying customers in the stores!
Lincoln's version of equal treatment would be said to have followed Matt 25::14-30 computing. The rich would get more, and the poor would be as well off just tossing any money into the dirt. They wouldn't have enough, and would go into foreclosure status, of that time.
The North was allowed to keep what they hast, the Southern property and assets only were taken away.
Anyone might have guessed that scholars of Abraham Lincoln would be reminding everyone that no person should ever be that insane again. The Genocide of 1861-1865--of the white people--never gets discussed much, however, in the schools!
"Crow, James Crow: Shaken, Not Stirred!"
(George Wallace Hear Our Prayer! Don't let the teachers get past the front door, ever again try to go into a school!
Has anyone really been far even as decided to use even go want to do look more like?
Everyone been already done as they seem like be.