Perhaps the outline below will help those on the ignorant right understand the differences between and among the right to free association and freedom of religion, and public accommodations laws as regulatory policy.
Public Accommodations Laws: government regulatory policy authorized by the Commerce Clause; they violate neither religious liberty nor private property rights.
Freedom of Association: First, Fourteenth Amendments; prohibits government from compelling private organizations not open to the general public as a business to accept unwanted individuals as members. Private organizations may deny membership for any reason, including race, religion, sexual orientation, and political beliefs.
Freedom of Religion: First Amendment; prohibits government from enacting punitive measures against citizens because of their religious beliefs, or because they are free from religion altogether.
The Supreme Court has held that religious beliefs, doctrine, and dogma are not Constitutional grounds to ignore or violate just, proper, and Constitutional laws – such as public accommodations laws:
“We have never held that an individual's religious beliefs excuse him from compliance with an otherwise valid law prohibiting conduct that the State is free to regulate. On the contrary, the record of more than a century of our free exercise jurisprudence contradicts that proposition.”
Employment Division v. Smith
Typical airheaded rubbish. .
That describes literally every post you make.
No surprise that you despise the law and the facts when they interrupt your right wing fantasies.