Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
You'll never accept anything I give you so forgive me if I choose not to waste my time. You (and everyone else here) know where the evidence is but you don't want to see it. That YOU are utterly unable to provide - or even SUGGEST - a cause for 59 fucking Fahrenheit degrees of warming should make you think that perhaps whoever fed you the nonsense you've bought into might not have been the most reliable source you could find.Pal review isn't science, it's politics.
Where's the repeatable, verifiable, and quantifiable science, schmendrick?
The only nonsense I've been fed is the blather from you warmers, when you're asked to provide the repeatable, quantifiable, and falsifiable science, that have been the gold standards of science for a couple thousand years.You'll never accept anything I give you so forgive me if I choose not to waste my time. You (and everyone else here) know where the evidence is but you don't want to see it. That YOU are utterly unable to provide - or even SUGGEST - a cause for 59 fucking Fahrenheit degrees of warming should make you think that perhaps whoever fed you the nonsense you've bought into might not have been the most reliable source you could find.
You're a fucking idiot. What, exactly, are you trying to say? That the CO2 levels of a billion years ago are responsible for the warming we've seen over the last century and a half? CO2 has been at 280 +20 ppm for the last 3 million years. Since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution, one-fourteen-thousandth that time span, we've pushed it up by 140 ppm.
That's not why people call you deniers. Get this crybabying out of here.LOL!
We ask for experiments, we ask for an explanation as to how CO2 suddenly went from lagging the temperature for 450,000 consecutive years to, somehow, magically driving, the climate and you calls us "Deniers"
Well there is a hilarious lie.With a much lower budget than climate change hysteria.
ConsensusThat's not why people call you deniers. Get this crybabying out of here.
But the fact that that you frauds go to message boards and demand evidence from nonscientist strangers is definitely a symptom of your denier mental handicap.
I have more than a clue that you're an ignorant fool and don't have an actual argument to make. If you think you do, lay it out here clearly.You are too dumb to understand apparently.
Already gave you the evidence several times in the last few days and STILL you don't have a clue what I am talking about.
LOL
This isn't "Evidence"but just a statement from the Far Left US Senate seeking to demonize the oil industry.
Nothing really new here at all.
If there is no greenhouse warming, the SB equation tells us that the Earth should be 59F or 33C degrees COLDER than it is. The world would be covered with ice. It's not. Please explain why.
The only nonsense I've been fed is the blather from you warmers, when you're asked to provide the repeatable, quantifiable, and falsifiable science, that have been the gold standards of science for a couple thousand years.
Pal review ≠ science.
Post hoc fallacy ≠ science.
Correlation fallacy ≠ science.
Begging the question ≠ science.
Demands for proof of the negative ≠ science.
Ad hom ≠ science.
You're batting 0-fer, cargo cultist.
Well there is a hilarious lie.
No, the most profitable industry in the history of the world is not being outspent.
Evidence?The only nonsense I've been fed is the blather from you warmers, when you're asked to provide the repeatable, quantifiable, and falsifiable science, that have been the gold standards of science for a couple thousand years.
Pal review ≠ science.
Evidence?Post hoc fallacy ≠ science.
Evidence?Correlation fallacy ≠ science.
Evidence?Begging the question ≠ science.
Evidence?Demands for proof of the negative ≠ science.
Evidence?Ad hom ≠ science.
When was the last time you posted a link to some actual, honest-to-fucking-god science? Do you know how to do it?You're batting 0-fer, cargo cultist.
Then explain it and show everyone how stupid I was, cause I really don't think anyone else gets it either.You are too dumb to understand apparently.
Already gave you the evidence several times in the last few days and STILL you don't have a clue what I am talking about.
LOL
*consensus of the evidenceConsensus
LOL
You must be looking for your assistant again. Will you EVER find him?How many hundreds of billions have governments spent to fight AGW?
Now show how much oil companies have spent in self-defense?
You must be looking for your assistant again. Will you EVER find him?
What "evidence" Did you finally find the experiment showing how much temperature increases when you raise CO2 from 280 to 400PPM?*consensus of the evidence
A foreign to concept to your contrails anti vax crowd.
What "evidence" Did you finally find the experiment showing how much temperature increases when you raise CO2 from 280 to 400PPM?
You "mocked me" by pretending to be totally ignorant? Weird... seems like that reflects more on you than it does on me....Just mocking your silly claim.
