- Jan 16, 2009
- 3,030
- 1,359
- 200
Typical MAGA reply. Total gaslight. The old up is down, left is right, fact is fiction.Yes the blue is the unintelligent dishonest part, the red are the people that work and have integrity and intelligence.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Typical MAGA reply. Total gaslight. The old up is down, left is right, fact is fiction.Yes the blue is the unintelligent dishonest part, the red are the people that work and have integrity and intelligence.
It was a paid opposition research paper used by the Democrats to attack Trump. Your article didn't contain the actual dossier, just opinions about it. It seemed bias. Nice try thoughWell then you obviously didn’t read it. It digs into the claims in the steel dossier and compares it with elements found in the public record and evidence from court proceedings.
So like I said. It was an oppo research intel report. Some of it proven and some of it not. It certainly wasn’t a list of things made up by the Dems.
Democrats always accuse the right of the things that they do and are. Good jobTypical MAGA reply. Total gaslight. The old up is down, left is right, fact is fiction.
Yeah the Russians are bad guys. There's no way they affected that election though. If Trump was working for the Russians like you Democrats say he was why would he sanction them? Their efforts were certainly minimal. I don't know what that has to do with your argument promoting censorship and propaganda by democrats. Try to hang in there and stick with the subject
I like how you’re trying to spin out of it by now saying top former officials.You are really kind of a stooge. These are not "top "former officials?
Named and Shamed: The 51 Intel Officials Who Lied About the Hunter Biden Laptop Emails - Election Central
- Mike Hayden, former CIA director, now analyst for CNN
- Jim Clapper, former director of national intelligence, now CNN pundit
- Leon Panetta, former CIA director and defense secretary
- John Brennan, former CIA director, now analyst for NBC and MSNBC
- Thomas Fingar, former National Intelligence Council chair, now teaches at Stanford University
- Rick Ledgett, former National Security Agency deputy director, now a director at M&T Bank
- John McLaughlin, former CIA acting director, now teaches at Johns Hopkins University
- Michael Morell, former CIA acting director, now at George Mason University
- Mike Vickers, former defense undersecretary for intelligence, now on board of BAE Systems
- Doug Wise, former Defense Intelligence Agency deputy director, teaches at University of New Mexico
- Nick Rasmussen, former National Counterterrorism Center director, now executive director, Global Internet Forum to Counter Terrorism
- Russ Travers, former National Counterterrorism
My article broke down various reports in the dossier and compared the intel what later came out in public statements and court proceedings.It was a paid opposition research paper used by the Democrats to attack Trump. Your article didn't contain the actual dossier, just opinions about it. It seemed bias. Nice try though
You just used my words, congratulations. Both sides of your mouth LOL you really are learning something from me . Now I'm really impressed by you hahaha. You didn't answer. Was the list of people that I sent you not "top" Former Intelligence people? Seems to me you're getting more and more dishonest as this discussion goes on. Obtuse also. Don't get me wrong, but the hypocrite is the one who apologizes for a government that censors and propagandizesI like to be accurate with words... Something you don't seem to care about.
When you accuse our intel agencies of writing a letter that they didn't write, that is fake news.
When you try and back up that claim by highlighting TOP intelligence officials when its really FORMER, thats more fake news.
Then out of the other side of your mouth you're bitching about propaganda... Thats exactly what you're engaging in when you misquote, distort and spread inaccurate statements in attempt to progress your political agenda. You're being a hypocrite
I am a Republican.Democrats always accuse the right of the things that they do and are. Good job
Who cares? Are you so stupid that you can't get what I mean? I think we're about done here. You loseI like how you’re trying to spin out of it by now saying top former officials.
The reason why I’m harping on your TOP label and leaving out FORMER is because you inaccurately said the letter was from our intel agencies. It wasn’t. FORMER officials signed it. Not active agents. That’s why words are important
Put that man in the White House and let him get back to work! Let him Make America Great!Massive 80,000 People Turn Out for Trump Rally in Wildwood, NJ
Some Republicans are more reprehensible than Democrats. I am MAGA. America firstI am a Republican.
I don't think she can find it either.Biden couldn't beat his d*ck if his wife told him where it was....~S~
I’m wasn’t taking issue with the word TOP I was taking issue with you leaving out the word FORMER and then inaccurately claiming that the letter was written by our intel agencies. Man you’re having a bad day aren’t yaYou just used my words, congratulations. Both sides of your mouth LOL you really are learning something from me . Now I'm really impressed by you hahaha. You didn't answer. Was the list of people that I sent you not "top" Former Intelligence people? Seems to me you're getting more and more dishonest as this discussion goes on. Obtuse also. Don't get me wrong, but the hypocrite is the one who apologizes for a government that censors and propagandizes
America first is ignorant and uneducated.Some Republicans are more reprehensible than Democrats. I am MAGA. America first
Oh there you go again, feeding that ego with insults and fictitious self appointed victories. Take your ball and go home if you can’t handle it.Who cares? Are you so stupid that you can't get what I mean? I think we're about done here. You lose
He posts as a low information bottom feeder. Real MAGA slop.Oh there you go again, feeding that ego with insults and fictitious self appointed victories. Take your ball and go home if you can’t handle it.
Eh, we've been talking about this letter for 3 days. Did you think that the intelligence people that signed off on this statement were current? Did you think that I thought so? Because I didn't label it as such in a post or two? I seriously thought it was common knowledge what and who they were. You didn't know that they were top officials? There's seriously something wrong with you. You don't take losing arguments well do you?I’m wasn’t taking issue with the word TOP I was taking issue with you leaving out the word FORMER and then inaccurately claiming that the letter was written by our intel agencies. Man you’re having a bad day aren’t ya
Just stop acting stupid, you bore me with itOh there you go again, feeding that ego with insults and fictitious self appointed victories. Take your ball and go home if you can’t handle it.
You said the letter was from our intel agencies. Are you claiming that former agents represent our currently operating intel agencies? That’s what started thisEh, we've been talking about this letter for 3 days. Did you think that the intelligence people that signed off on this statement were current? Did you think that I thought so?
Here you go smart guy. Read the thread. You must be dizzy from all the spin:Eh, we've been talking about this letter for 3 days. Did you think that the intelligence people that signed off on this statement were current? Did you think that I thought so? Because I didn't label it as such in a post or two? I seriously thought it was common knowledge what and who they were. You didn't know that they were top officials? There's seriously something wrong with you. You don't take losing arguments well do you?
Statements from our Intel agencies like the ones made in the letter we've been arguing about
The letter wasn’t a statement from our intel agencies. Those were retired agents
51 top intelligence officials LOL. TOP hahaha you've been fooled!
I’m wasn’t taking issue with the word TOP I was taking issue with you leaving out the word FORMER and then inaccurately claiming that the letter was written by our intel agencies