Marener
Platinum Member
- Jul 26, 2022
- 27,392
- 12,863
- 973
His trial was scheduled for January 9th, 2023 but he delayed that one too.Really, show us another time he supposedly did it. I'll wait.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
His trial was scheduled for January 9th, 2023 but he delayed that one too.Really, show us another time he supposedly did it. I'll wait.
Prove it.His trial was scheduled for January 9th, 2023 but he delayed that one too.
Weight of the evidence against him is very strongSo what he did is worse than murder? Again, you are defending fascists.
Name those “four” factors and link the source.
And if even alleged murderers can get bail, then the nature of these charges suggests that the denial of bail has to be based on other factors.
What are those other factors?
Not persuasive.
They’re not trying to persuade you. Your opinion is too afflicted with partisan bias to be relevant.Not persuasive.
Again, even if we assume that Lang was a participant of the J6 “mob,” and even if we assume that some of his behavior was literally violent (shoving a door on a cop and kicking a cop), that doesn’t mean he shouldn’t be allowed out on bail.
There is no valid basis to believe that he constitutes being a “flight risk” which is the primary basis on bail consideration.
There is also zero honest basis to believe that he might engage in further violent behavior (which is really a shitty argument as to bail, anyway, since bail is not supposed to be “preventive detention”).
Actually, they were addressing an argument to the court. I wasn’t addressing their filing. I was addressing your mistaken reliance on that argument.They’re not trying to persuade you. Your opinion is too afflicted with partisan bias to be relevant.
Complete gibberish, which is what I expect from a hack who bends reality to maintain their world view.Actually, they were addressing an argument to the court. I wasn’t addressing their filing. I was addressing your mistaken reliance on that argument.
And for a hack like you to make any comment about partisan bias is quite ironic and extremely laughable.
That could be inscribed on your tombstone. Your every post proves it more and more.Complete gibberish
which is what I expect from a hack who bends reality to maintain their world view.
That doesn’t mean a whole lot.The fact is the government’s argument was persuasive to the court
and he was denied bail.
If some loser wants to cry about a violent unrepentant piece of shit, that’s their problem.
Apparently bail is not perfectly appropriate.That could be inscribed on your tombstone. Your every post proves it more and more.
Except, I don’t. You do. Maybe your best job would be in a movie theater. As a projectionist. You do a lot of projection.
That doesn’t mean a whole lot.
Yes. We all know that. Thus, the question, you idiot hack.
If you want to cry and defend the denial of bail where bail is perfectly appropriate, that is just additional evidence that you’re a hack and lack credibility.
It certainly isn’t.Apparently bail is not perfectly appropriate.
Your rebuttal to the government’s argument is summarized as “nuh uh”.
Your argument is non existent. And your claim about the strength of my argument is devoid of support or merit.That argument is pretty weak.
A guy committing a violent action to keep a loser in power.They do not want him explaining what happened. WTF do you think this is about troll?
How do you know this? You are talking out of your ass,Weight of the evidence against him is very strong
His characteristics indicate lack of remorse and pride of his illegal behavior
He’s a flight risk and danger to public given his statements that he wants to escalate actions against the government.
Read the court documents and not stupid shit you read on social media.How do you know this? You are talking out of your ass,
You are the delusional one thinking these people need to be punished like animals for a protest. Intimidation, fear, and useful idiots like you standing behind the governments skirt running your lips. You make me ill.Read the court documents and not stupid shit you read on social media.
Of course, if you were capable of doing that before, you wouldn’t be so delusional so why start now?
Correction. I wrote “civil” complaint. I meant “criminal.”I am reviewing the unnamed FBI agent’s supporting affidavit which was the basis for the initial civil complaint.
There is no doubt at all that Lang was present, was a participant and seems to have been very proud of it.
At paragraph numbered “24,” the agent finally seems to support the claim that Lang acted violently.
To be very clear at this juncture, I absolutely oppose the criminal behavior of any of the Jan 6 protestors (especially the “mob component”) and I offer zero defense for any assault against the law enforcement officers who were there to secure and protect our Capitol.
Therefore, let’s assume (hypothetically) that despite his SCOTUS application, that there is perfectly good reason to try him on the indictment. In fact, let’s go even further: let’s assume that when he does get tried, he is very likely to be convicted (and let’s assume the verdict is perfectly fair and proper).
With that basis, I’m still asking: why is he not entitled to a reasonable bail?
He was beating cops with a baseball bat.You are the delusional one thinking these people need to be punished like animals for a protest. Intimidation, fear, and useful idiots like you standing behind the governments skirt running your lips. You make me ill.
Bullshit. The video please.He was beating cops with a baseball bat.
Over three years without a trial, or bond. What did this man do to be treated like this? This should piss everyone off. Why are the Feds scared of giving him a trial?
Over three years without a trial, or bond. What did this man do to be treated like this? This should piss everyone off. Why are the Feds scared of giving him a trial?