US Message Board 🦅

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

U.S. Army to Introduce XM7 Rifle, Marking the End of the Iconic M16 Series

Doc7505

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2016
Messages
15,850
Reaction score
27,900
Points
2,430

U.S. Army to Introduce XM7 Rifle,

Marking the End of the Iconic M16 Series

7 Apr 2024 ~~

After over five decades of faithful service, the M16 series, an icon of American military might and a direct descendant of the AR-15 designed by Eugene Stoner will be succeeded by Sig Sauer's advanced XM7 rifle. The M16, first introduced in 1964, has been the most-produced 5.56x45mm weapon, marking a significant chapter in the annals of U.S. military history. The latest variant, the M16A4, known for its three-round burst feature, will soon yield to the cutting-edge design of the XM7, a testament to the relentless pursuit of small arms excellence.

Commentary:
XM7

TypeAssault rifle
Place of originUnited States
In service2022–present
Used byUnited States Army
Designed2019
ManufacturerSIG Sauer
Weight8.38 lb (3.8 kg), 9.84 lb (4.46 kg) (with suppressor)
Length36 in (914.4 mm) (with suppressor)
Barrel length13 in (330.2 mm)
Cartridge6.8×51mm
ActionShort-stroke gas-operated piston, rotating bolt
Muzzle velocity915 m/s (3,001.97 ft/s)
Feed system20-round detachable SR-25 pattern box magazine, 25-round detachable SR-25 pattern box magazine (optional)

The M4, M249 weapons fire a lighter 5.56mm round which years of Army studies found to be inadequate against proliferating Russian and Chinese body armor.
The XM7’s suppressor is quite effective in reducing the noise of firing the gun, a feature that, along with its increased range, not only increases shooter concealment potential but helps members of a squad communicate verbally in the midst of combat.
Despite that advantage, losing the weight may be more important to soldiers physically stressed by long days of combat engagement and maneuver.
The 6.8x51mm cartridge is similar to the .270/308 Winchester, firing a 135gr. FMJ Ball ammo at 2,750 ft/sec.
 

TroglocratsRdumb

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 11, 2017
Messages
36,229
Reaction score
46,434
Points
2,915
It looks a lot like the M-16
XM7 Rifle.png


 

1srelluc

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2021
Messages
41,927
Reaction score
59,117
Points
3,488
Location
Shenandoah Valley of Virginia
It's still a 8-9# weapon not counting all the optics that will be stuck atop it.

At least it does not shit where it eats and uses a much more effective cartridge.
 

jotathought

Diamond Member
Joined
May 10, 2022
Messages
5,101
Reaction score
6,092
Points
1,938
Location
Dallas, Texas
It's still a 8-9# weapon not counting all the optics that will be stuck atop it.

At least it does not shit where it eats and uses a much more effective cartridge.
Larger caliber (.27 caliber), larger bullet weight (85 - 130 grains) and an impressive 2500-3000 FPS velocity. Be interesting to see the performance of this round.
 

Concerned American

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2020
Messages
32,767
Reaction score
33,026
Points
2,788
Location
In your head
direct gas impingement
Oh, I see. DGI eliminated the piston and the gas works directly on the carrier group. I can see where this would reduce weight, but because the gas port is longer, I would think the potential for fouling would be greater.
 

Zincwarrior

Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2021
Messages
17,360
Reaction score
10,541
Points
1,138
It's still a 8-9# weapon not counting all the optics that will be stuck atop it.

At least it does not shit where it eats and uses a much more effective cartridge.
Its the cartridge. Personal armor is getting better.

Needs an underslung personal drone launcher (with antipersonelle charge) tied to the optic.

Next up...phased plasma rifles. 🤔
 

AZrailwhale

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2020
Messages
11,908
Reaction score
9,047
Points
2,138
Location
Arizona
Am I missing something--it says gas-operated piston. The M-14 and the M-16 had a gas-operated piston action with rotating bolts. I don't see a difference.
The M-14 used a piston operated by gas. The M-16 used direct impingement of gas on the bolt carrier group to operate. The gas makes the interior workings absolutely filthy.
 

Concerned American

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 5, 2020
Messages
32,767
Reaction score
33,026
Points
2,788
Location
In your head
The M-14 used a piston operated by gas. The M-16 used direct impingement of gas on the bolt carrier group to operate. The gas makes the interior workings absolutely filthy.
So just so I understand, the XM7 is returning to the M14 style of gas-operated piston and abandoning the impingement system. Is that correct?
 

Oddball

Unobtanium Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
103,454
Reaction score
107,401
Points
3,615
Location
Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
Oh, I see. DGI eliminated the piston and the gas works directly on the carrier group. I can see where this would reduce weight, but because the gas port is longer, I would think the potential for fouling would be greater.
It is....That's a primary cause of them jamming.
 

Doc7505

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2016
Messages
15,850
Reaction score
27,900
Points
2,430
It's still a 8-9# weapon not counting all the optics that will be stuck atop it.

At least it does not shit where it eats and uses a much more effective cartridge.
~~~~~~
Personally, I like the use of the 6.8x51mm cartridge. It shoots flatter and more effective range.
However. will Joey XiBaiDung's DEI army handle the heavier and more powerful M-7?
Seriously gender neutral and trans-genders in the military may balk at the weight and power of the new weapon for their dainty physiques....
:abgg2q.jpg:
 
Last edited:

para bellum

Platinum Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2022
Messages
3,827
Reaction score
2,315
Points
938
Location
PacNW
Necked down .308, a little less punch than a .270 but a great round, I think. Lot better penetration than a 5.56.

The gun is pricey as hell (for me anyway) at a little more than $4K and only available in 7.62x51 for civilians last time I checked.

Maybe the price will come down in a few years or other makers will copy...
 

Failzero

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2011
Messages
14,576
Reaction score
7,670
Points
928
Location
Oak Run Ca.
Necked down .308, a little less punch than a .270 but a great round, I think. Lot better penetration than a 5.56.

The gun is pricey as hell (for me anyway) at a little more than $4K and only available in 7.62x51 for civilians last time I checked.

Maybe the price will come down in a few years or other makers will copy...
Clones in 556 no doubt, and 22LR for sure
 

Forum List

Top