Pastor Calls Out Trump’s Bible Blasphemy In EXPLOSIVE Sermon

Not Trump’s call. No state wanted to hear any affidavit on January 6.
it's his campaign, it's all his call for him. Just like if it were Xiden. No state allowed the court to hear them. Big difference, that's election interference. There was a qualified claim protesting activities inside the room where ballots were counted. It is beholding to hear the complaint! It is constitutional to hear the complaint. Funny, why is it so many states stopped counting at the same time in the morning and only in the states that turned the count to xiden.

go to 2:12

 
In my view when Trump told the J6 mob that if Mike Pence does what he was asked to do then Trump wins the election and Biden never becomes president, was his admission of criminal intent to overturn the election and he engaged in the means to do it. I knew it the moment he said it on J6.
Your “view” is myopic and illogical.
 
Engaged in a criminal conspiracy to overturn the 2020 election by disenfranchising all Biden voters including the nine out of 10 black voters who wanted Trump out of the White House is about as racist as you can get.
Not even remotely racist despite your laughable spin.
And your apologetics for him is as racist as you can get as well .
Yiur an ignorant and dishonest twat.

And I am not offering apologetics, you fuckstick. I am merely disputing libturd dishonesty. Like yours.
 
In my view when Trump told the J6 mob that if Mike Pence does what he was asked to do then Trump wins the election and Biden never becomes president, was his admission of criminal intent to overturn the election and he engaged in the means to do it. I knew it the moment he said it on J6.
Aside from your myopic and illogical spew, I will add a sidebar comment.

I, to this day, agree with Pence and disagree with Trump on what Trump “asked” Pence to do relative to the Constitutional duty as to to the confirmation of the election results.

That said, Trump’s request doesn’t demonstrate anything about any criminal “intent” of any kind. Being wrong doesn’t equal criminal intent.
 
There used to be mostly normal Christians being neutral or pro/choice on abortion.

Please read this because you have no facts.

https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2024/03/21/life-conception-christian-theology-00147804
In fact, within the lifetimes of many of today’s evangelical Christian believers, their churches either supported abortion rights or were neutral on it. In the 1960s and 1970s, Southern Baptists and other historically conservative Protestant denominations held that abortion was not only permissible, but also should be left to individual choice. In 1968, a group of evangelical leaders from a variety of denominations wrote in a document titled “A Protestant Affirmation on the Control of Human Reproduction” that they could not agree whether or not abortion is sinful outright, but they could agree “about the necessity of it and permissibility for it under certain circumstances.” They even argued that “the preservation of fetal life ... may have to be abandoned to maintain full and secure family life.”
A few years later in 1971, the Southern Baptist Convention issued a joint resolution calling for Southern Baptists “to work for legislation that will allow the possibility of abortion under such conditions as rape, incest, clear evidence of severe fetal deformity, and carefully ascertained evidence of the likelihood of damage to the emotional, mental, and physical health of the mother.”
This resolution was in accord with Baptist views on abortion at the time. As the Baptist Press, a news service affiliated with the Southern Baptist Convention, wrote in 2015:
“Between 1965-68, abortion was referenced at least 85 times in popular magazines and scholarly journals, but no Baptist state paper mentioned abortion and no Baptist body took action related to the subject. ... In 1970, a poll conducted by the Baptist Sunday School Board found that 70 percent of Southern Baptist pastors supported abortion to protect the mental or physical health of the mother, 64 percent supported abortion in cases of fetal deformity and 71 percent in cases of rape. Three years later, a poll conducted by the Baptist Standard news journal found that 90 percent of Texas Baptists believed their state’s abortion laws were too restrictive.”
The famed evangelical theologian Norman Geisler put it in the clearest terms in the 1971 and 1975 versions of his work Christian Ethics: “The embryo is not fully human — it is an undeveloped person.”
It’s not Protestants, but Catholics in the United States who, as a religious community, have opposed abortion forcefully going back to the 19th century, and it is in Catholicism that we find the view that life begins at conception. Starting with an 1869 document called Apostolicae Sedis, Pope Pius IX declared the penalty of excommunication for abortions at any stage of pregnancy.
If the argument was if anything in the womb was life, would you deny it? That means the hundreds of billions of dollars we spent going to Mars is a farce, let alone other space missions. We should have the right where most abortions come from, and any individuals have multi abortions and their lifestyles. Progs tell us all women are strong. Laws enforced to destroy anyone who denies it. Then everything that belies that strength is marginalized. Let us know if abortions at the level we have them is due to irresponsible ways over a mistake.
 
RICO. robbery and extortion applies here. U.S. federal statute targeting organized crime and white-collar crime.

In order for an individual or organization to be convicted of racketeering under RICO, there must be proof of a “pattern” of illegal offenses, which RICO defines as the commission of at least two identified criminal offenses within a 10-year period. RICO defines racketeering in an extremely broad manner and includes many offenses that do not ordinarily violate federal statutes, such as any act or threat involving murder, kidnapping, gambling, arson, robbery, bribery, extortion, or dealing in narcotic or other dangerous drugs.​


Defendant Donald John Trump lost the United States presidential election held on November 3, 2020. One of the states he lost was Georgia. Trump and the other Defendants charged in this Indictment refused to accept that Trump lost, and they knowingly and willfully joined a conspiracy to unlawfully change the outcome of the election in favor of Trump. That conspiracy contained a common plan and purpose to commit two or more acts of racketeering activity in Fulton County, Georgia, elsewhere in the State of Georgia, and in other states.

MANNER AND METHODS OF THE ENTERPRISE. The manner and methods used by the Defendants and other members and associates of the enterprise to further the goals of the enterprise and to achieve its purposes included, but were. not limited to, the following:

1. False Statements to and Solicitation of State Legislatures
2. False Statements to and Solicitation of HighRanking State Officials
3. Creation and Distribution of False Electoral College Documents
5. Solicitation of High-Ranking United States Department of Justice Officials
6. Solicitation of the Vice President of the United States
8. Obstructive Acts in Furtherance of the Conspiracy and the Cover Up.


Once again, you're quoting a law that GA has no authority to enforce and according to the definition you just provided, RICO wouldn't apply anyway. Care to address my question again?

.
 
If the argument was if anything in the womb was life, would you deny it? That means the hundreds of billions of dollars we spent going to Mars is a farce, let alone other space missions. We should have the right where most abortions come from, and any individuals have multi abortions and their lifestyles. Progs tell us all women are strong. Laws enforced to destroy anyone who denies it. Then everything that belies that strength is marginalized. Let us know if abortions at the level we have them is due to irresponsible ways over a mistake.
They call it demofk shame classics. Shame anyone who doesn't comply with killing babies in the womb.
 
it's his campaign, it's all his call for him. Just like if it were Xiden. No state allowed the court to hear them. Big difference, that's election interference. There was a qualified claim protesting activities inside the room where ballots were counted. It is beholding to hear the complaint! It is constitutional to hear the complaint. Funny, why is it so many states stopped counting at the same time in the morning and only in the states that turned the count to xiden.

go to 2:12




And the fraud extended into 2022:

Texas judge orders new election after GOP lawsuit challenged 2022 election result in Houston area​



.
 

Forum List

Back
Top