Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Oh, the times, they are a-changing.
Popular vote winner IN THE STATE.
This has nothing to do with the likely unconstitutional interstate vote compact, in fact this decision if you read it shows that the current SC might find issues with it if it were ever brought before it.
No you don't get it either....it makes the EC be the EC that was intended when enacted....it strengthens it.....No objection to the ruling. That said, it makes the EC almost superfluous.
We are a representative republic....look it up....its a genius move by our founders and the EC is in place to keep more populated states from ruling over less populated states....this way every city and state chooses our president not just NY and LA....really....read up on it and I'm sure you will at least understand if not appreciate the EC....No you don't get it either....it makes the EC be the EC that was intended when enacted....it strengthens it.....No objection to the ruling. That said, it makes the EC almost superfluous.
Isn't it the popular vote of each state determines the winner?
We are a representative republic....look it up....its a genius move by our founders and the EC is in place to keep more populated states from ruling over less populated states....this way every city and state chooses our president not just NY and LA....really....read up on it and I'm sure you will at least understand if not appreciate the EC....No you don't get it either....it makes the EC be the EC that was intended when enacted....it strengthens it.....No objection to the ruling. That said, it makes the EC almost superfluous.
Isn't it the popular vote of each state determines the winner?
Oh, the times, they are a-changing.
In effect yes.... We go to the polls and people cast their vote, when they vote they are actually voting for a group of people called electors...The number of electors each state gets is equal to its total number of Senators and Representatives in Congress...... A total of 538 electors form the Electoral College....The candidate who gets 270 votes or more wins......this way more populated states have an edge but can't roll over the nation like with a popular vote....We are a representative republic....look it up....its a genius move by our founders and the EC is in place to keep more populated states from ruling over less populated states....this way every city and state chooses our president not just NY and LA....really....read up on it and I'm sure you will at least understand if not appreciate the EC....No you don't get it either....it makes the EC be the EC that was intended when enacted....it strengthens it.....No objection to the ruling. That said, it makes the EC almost superfluous.
Isn't it the popular vote of each state determines the winner?
That’s didn’t answer my question. Does the popular vote of each state determine the winner?
Edit: in determining who the electors will choose.
In effect yes.... We go to the polls and people cast their vote, when they vote they are actually voting for a group of people called electors...The number of electors each state gets is equal to its total number of Senators and Representatives in Congress...... A total of 538 electors form the Electoral College....The candidate who gets 270 votes or more wins......We are a representative republic....look it up....its a genius move by our founders and the EC is in place to keep more populated states from ruling over less populated states....this way every city and state chooses our president not just NY and LA....really....read up on it and I'm sure you will at least understand if not appreciate the EC....No you don't get it either....it makes the EC be the EC that was intended when enacted....it strengthens it.....No objection to the ruling. That said, it makes the EC almost superfluous.
Isn't it the popular vote of each state determines the winner?
That’s didn’t answer my question. Does the popular vote of each state determine the winner?
Edit: in determining who the electors will choose.
See this why more populated states have an edge but can't roll over the rest of the nation....like with a popular vote...In effect yes.... We go to the polls and people cast their vote, when they vote they are actually voting for a group of people called electors...The number of electors each state gets is equal to its total number of Senators and Representatives in Congress...... A total of 538 electors form the Electoral College....The candidate who gets 270 votes or more wins......We are a representative republic....look it up....its a genius move by our founders and the EC is in place to keep more populated states from ruling over less populated states....this way every city and state chooses our president not just NY and LA....really....read up on it and I'm sure you will at least understand if not appreciate the EC....No you don't get it either....it makes the EC be the EC that was intended when enacted....it strengthens it.....No objection to the ruling. That said, it makes the EC almost superfluous.
Isn't it the popular vote of each state determines the winner?
That’s didn’t answer my question. Does the popular vote of each state determine the winner?
Edit: in determining who the electors will choose.
Ok, we’re on the same page.
Oh, the times, they are a-changing.
Popular vote winner IN THE STATE.
This has nothing to do with the likely unconstitutional interstate vote compact, in fact this decision if you read it shows that the current SC might find issues with it if it were ever brought before it.
Our State Legislation pass the National Interstate EC law. No one has contested it yet. Right now, the EC has to go with the State's popular vote. Chances are, when it is contested the new law will be bounced big time. It's a knee jerk reaction to Rump.
See this way more populated states have an edge but can't roll over the rest of the nation....like with a popular vote...In effect yes.... We go to the polls and people cast their vote, when they vote they are actually voting for a group of people called electors...The number of electors each state gets is equal to its total number of Senators and Representatives in Congress...... A total of 538 electors form the Electoral College....The candidate who gets 270 votes or more wins......We are a representative republic....look it up....its a genius move by our founders and the EC is in place to keep more populated states from ruling over less populated states....this way every city and state chooses our president not just NY and LA....really....read up on it and I'm sure you will at least understand if not appreciate the EC....No you don't get it either....it makes the EC be the EC that was intended when enacted....it strengthens it.....No objection to the ruling. That said, it makes the EC almost superfluous.
Isn't it the popular vote of each state determines the winner?
That’s didn’t answer my question. Does the popular vote of each state determine the winner?
Edit: in determining who the electors will choose.
Ok, we’re on the same page.
Oh yeah, professor? Okay, tell us what you would expect a congressional rep to do about it. For a laugh.Worry about NYC and all the new crime there AOC
Maybe she could represent her district as it is falling and burning up.Oh yeah, professor? Okay, tell us what you would expect a congressional rep to do about it. For a laugh.Worry about NYC and all the new crime there AOC
Oh, the times, they are a-changing.
Next time, read the article....hmmmkay
She just won her primary with over 70%.Maybe she could represent her district as it is falling and burning up.Oh yeah, professor? Okay, tell us what you would expect a congressional rep to do about it. For a laugh.Worry about NYC and all the new crime there AOC
Yes professor, you already said that. I asked you what a congressional rep should do about it. Keep in mind, you have probably whined quite a bit about the bills she has sponsored to help her constituency. We are all dying to hear your expert advice.Maybe she could represent her district as it is falling and burning up.
Oh, the times, they are a-changing.
Its the only really fair way to elect a national leader of a multi state nation...this is why the senate matters....See this way more populated states have an edge but can't roll over the rest of the nation....like with a popular vote...In effect yes.... We go to the polls and people cast their vote, when they vote they are actually voting for a group of people called electors...The number of electors each state gets is equal to its total number of Senators and Representatives in Congress...... A total of 538 electors form the Electoral College....The candidate who gets 270 votes or more wins......We are a representative republic....look it up....its a genius move by our founders and the EC is in place to keep more populated states from ruling over less populated states....this way every city and state chooses our president not just NY and LA....really....read up on it and I'm sure you will at least understand if not appreciate the EC....No you don't get it either....it makes the EC be the EC that was intended when enacted....it strengthens it.....No objection to the ruling. That said, it makes the EC almost superfluous.
Isn't it the popular vote of each state determines the winner?
That’s didn’t answer my question. Does the popular vote of each state determine the winner?
Edit: in determining who the electors will choose.
Ok, we’re on the same page.
I understand that, but my point was that the EC was mostly superfluous because the popular vote of each state was and is being used to determine the winner.
What this ruling does is punish those who do not honor the winner of that states popular vote.
That said, it was a matter of semantics on my part.
Which two states?...and how many democrat senators were in the states?....Exactly. Two states that voted for Hillary had electors who voted for Trump. No more of that shit.