Some observations:
Not enough specific information about compensation to evaluate. Making 16% less than she was ten years ago? My "bullshit meter" is off the chart. I do not believe it.
Teachers seem unable to compare their compensation with that in the Real World. While payscales are all over the lot around the country (40% of my local public school teachers make over $100k), they seem incapable of recognizing the value of (a) minimal contribution to healthcare and other benefits, and (b) ability to retire in their mid-50's, which NOBODY IN THE PRIVATE SECTOR CAN DO! Not to mention the three greatest benefits: June, July, and August. $50k as a teacher is equivalent to $75k, at least, in the real world.
The point of teachers requiring a "masters degree" is, for the most part, baloney. "Education" as an undergraduate major is one of the least rigorous disciplines in the catalogue. Most states require a certain number of "graduate" credits for permanent certification, and many universities offer a "Masters Degree" for just a few more credits, trying to get this additional business. But those masters degrees are also of marginal academic rigor. No thesis, no comprehensive exam, and many survey courses. Comparing that degree to even a Masters in Poli-Sci is ludicrous.
With the ubiquitous teacher complaints about having to "teach to the test," where [the fuck] are the teachers' unions? If they don't like the tests, then THE UNIONS SHOULD OFFER TO DEVELOP THE TESTS! No rational person can propose that it is not necessary to test students' mastery of the subject material in some manner. If they don't like the current tests, then they should propose their own. The failure of the unions to do this, and to publicize that they are doing this, is proof that it is all bullshit, and they are not serious about the issue.