Why complaints about "modern women" have no basis

[Midnight FM]

Every now and then, I tend to see individuals complaining about "modern Women", "modern American women", "modern Western women", or something along those lines.

Naturally, their complaints are unsubstantiated rhetoric, or just boil down to subjective, personal anecdotes. They're often coupled with some inaccurate take on women from a past era or some undeveloped part of the world which is romanticized, and also ends up being unsubstantiated rhetoric.

Most likely, the individuals who do this are watching clickbait videos on Youtube and mindless regurgitating whatever the neckbeards in the videos are saying. The rhetoric has to come from somewhere, and none if it is remotely original, so this is my best bet.

 

[g5000]

Every now and then, I tend to see individuals complaining about "modern Women", "modern American women", "modern Western women", or something along those lines.

Naturally, their complaints are unsubstantiated rhetoric, or just boil down to subjective, personal anecdotes. They're often coupled with some inaccurate take on women from a past era or some undeveloped part of the world which is romanticized, and also ends up being unsubstantiated rhetoric.

Most likely, the individuals who do this are watching clickbait videos on Youtube and mindless regurgitating whatever the neckbeards in the videos are saying. The rhetoric has to come from somewhere, and none if it is remotely original, so this is my best bet..

Incels can't handle women who do their own thinking.

Tucker Carlson tells incels their problem is they don't get enough red light on their balls.

Is this gay, or what:

.

.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Every now and then, I tend to see individuals complaining about "modern Women", "modern American women", "modern Western women", or something along those lines.

Naturally, their complaints are unsubstantiated rhetoric, or just boil down to subjective, personal anecdotes. They're often coupled with some inaccurate take on women from a past era or some undeveloped part of the world which is romanticized, and also ends up being unsubstantiated rhetoric.

Most likely, the individuals who do this are watching clickbait videos on Youtube and mindless regurgitating whatever the neckbeards in the videos are saying. The rhetoric has to come from somewhere, and none if it is remotely original, so this is my best bet.

The "modern American women" with dicks bring down the curve for everyone. So do the "feminists" who hate being females.

Take the Dillon Mulvaneys and Rosie O'Donnels out of the equation, and modern American women are no more or less messed up than their 1950's counterparts.

I can absolutely say that it is modern American men who are a disappointment to those of us who were raised to understan that the title "man" was an honor to be earned.

If American womanhood has declined, blame modern American men who thought that feminists were a good source of instruction in how to be alpha males from.

 

[Midnight FM]

The "modern American women" with dicks bring down the curve for everyone.

Transgenders are a tiny percentage of the population who receive disproportionate attention.

So do the "feminists" who hate being females.

I'm not aware of anyone who hates being female. Why would anyone?

Take the Dillon Mulvaneys and Rosie O'Donnels out of the equation, and modern American women are no more or less messed up than their 1950's counterparts.

I can absolutely say that it is modern American men who are a disappointment to those of us who were raised to understan that the title "man" was an honor to be earned.

These romanticized notions of the past don't hold up to scrutiny.

If being an "alpha man" means anything, it was always a minority of men who fit this definition, not the "average" man.

If American womanhood has declined, blame modern American men who thought that feminists were a good source of instruction in how to be alpha males from.

So, a strawman? Really?

 

[luiza]

were raised to understan that the title "man" was an honor to be earned.

If you are under Stan , Floppy , your views as a queer are likely not representative.

 

[Hafar1014]

Every now and then, I tend to see individuals complaining about "modern Women", "modern American women", "modern Western women", or something along those lines.

Naturally, their complaints are unsubstantiated rhetoric, or just boil down to subjective, personal anecdotes. They're often coupled with some inaccurate take on women from a past era or some undeveloped part of the world which is romanticized, and also ends up being unsubstantiated rhetoric.

Most likely, the individuals who do this are watching clickbait videos on Youtube and mindless regurgitating whatever the neckbeards in the videos are saying. The rhetoric has to come from somewhere, and none if it is remotely original, so this is my best bet.

Women today are on anti depressants in record numbers.
Research consistently indicates a higher prevalence of antidepressant use among women compared to men, and data suggests these rates have been increasing over time, particularly among women.
Here's a summary of findings related to this trend:

• Higher Antidepressant Use in Women: Women are consistently found to use antidepressants at a higher rate than men. For example, during 2015–2018, 17.7% of adult women in the United States used antidepressants compared to 8.4% of men.
• Increasing Trends Over Time: The percentage of women taking antidepressants increased between 2009–2010 and 2017–2018, while the rate for men remained relatively stable.
• Age-Related Differences: Antidepressant use increases with age in both sexes, but the highest rates are observed in older women. Nearly one-quarter of women aged 60 and over used antidepressants during 2015–2018. Google

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Every now and then, I tend to see individuals complaining about "modern Women", "modern American women", "modern Western women", or something along those lines.

Naturally, their complaints are unsubstantiated rhetoric, or just boil down to subjective, personal anecdotes. They're often coupled with some inaccurate take on women from a past era or some undeveloped part of the world which is romanticized, and also ends up being unsubstantiated rhetoric.

Most likely, the individuals who do this are watching clickbait videos on Youtube and mindless regurgitating whatever the neckbeards in the videos are saying. The rhetoric has to come from somewhere, and none if it is remotely original, so this is my best bet.

So you present an argument against rhetoric and subjectivity, by using your own rhetoric and subjectivity.
LOL

 

[Seymour Flops]

If you are under Stan , Floppy , your views as a queer are likely not representative.

Shutup, homophobe.

 

[martybegan]

Incels can't handle women who do their own thinking.

Tucker Carlson tells incels their problem is they don't get enough red light on their balls.

Is this gay, or what:

.

.

Socially awkward males, the only group you can be a bigot against without any consequences.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Socially awkward males, the only group you can be a bigot against without any consequences.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Socially awkward males, the only group you can be a bigot against without any consequences.

And those that aren't weak little boys? --- "TOXIC MASCULINITY!!! EVIL RAPIST!!! ABUSER!!!"

Idiots.

 

[g5000]

Socially awkward males, the only group you can be a bigot against without any consequences.

Does Tucker Carlson strike you as socially awkward?

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Does Tucker Carlson strike you as socially awkward?

Why does Tucker Carlson mean so much to you to ask?

 

[g5000]

Why does Tucker Carlson mean so much to you to ask?

Um...did you even bother to read my first post, or do you just run on cult hivemind reflex?

 

[iamwhatiseem]

Um...did you even bother to read my first post, or do you just run on cult hivemind reflex?

I did, but why does it matter in this thread?
I am genuinely curious. The OP makes a laughable post about unacceptable rhetoric, and then produces his own rhetoric to substantiate it.
And you make some random post about Tucker Carlson and infrared on your balls
And then bring him up again

 

[martybegan]

Does Tucker Carlson strike you as socially awkward?

He strikes me as someone who started out OK but is going the way of Candence Owens.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

He strikes me as someone who started out OK but is going the way of Candence Owens.

For sure, and many conservatives agree, because we are actually capable of thinking for ourselves.
He strayed way off the path some time ago, and went rogue.

 

[g5000]

He strikes me as someone who started out OK but is going the way of Candence Owens.

Tucker Carlson has never been okay.

When sued for defamation, his defense in court was that no serious person would bleev his bullshit.

When Trump launched his Big Lie about the 2020 election, Carlson spoke in private that Trump lost, the election was won fair and square, he could not wait for Trump to be gone, and he called Trump a "demonic force".

But on the air, he ******* lied through his teeth to keep the rubes' eyeballs on Fox News. His one and only concern was they would leave Fox News and start watching Newsmax.

When another host tried to fact check Trump's Big Lie on the air, Tucker demanded she be shut down and not to ever do that again.

So, **** no. Carlson has NEVER been okay. He fed your bullshit delusions and shit all over what he knew to be the truth.

Which makes him a demonic force, too.

 

[martybegan]

Tucker Carlson has never been okay.

When sued for defamation, his defense in court was that no serious person would bleev his bullshit.

When Trump launched his Big Lie about the 2020 election, Carlson spoke in private that Trump lost, the election was won fair and square, he could not wait for Trump to be gone, and he called Trump a "demonic force".

But on the air, he ******* lied through his teeth to keep the rubes' eyeballs on Fox News. His one and only concern was they would leave Fox News and start watching Newsmax.

When another host tried to fact check Trump's Big Lie on the air, Tucker demanded she be shut down and not to ever do that again.

So, **** no. Carlson has NEVER been okay. He fed your bullshit delusions and shit all over what he knew to be the truth.

Which makes him a demonic force, too.

You are far more insane than Tucker.

You are probably at the same level as Owens.

 

[iamwhatiseem]

You are far more insane than Tucker.

You are probably at the same level as Owens.

On some things yes, G5000 is a lot like Mac1958 - Trump broke both of them.
Great example of both the reality of, and the effects of the illness.